Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site
clause in a will
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 510 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
clause in a will
I want to arrange for one particular beneficiary to receive the full IHT nil rate amount..all rest elsewhere
OK currently £325000 (ignore house)
but rather than actually state £325000 is there an acceptable wording that would allow for any changes in that amount, and not cause me to have to keep changing the will??
am certain many have done this, so i not the first
TIA
OK currently £325000 (ignore house)
but rather than actually state £325000 is there an acceptable wording that would allow for any changes in that amount, and not cause me to have to keep changing the will??
am certain many have done this, so i not the first
TIA
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 645 times
- Been thanked: 6751 times
Re: clause in a will
I would think that it would need to be phrased in general terms rather than specific amounts. The NRB can be 325K, 500K, 650K or a million under current rules. Or something between those numbers. Or less than 325K if there are PETs less than 7 years old.
And of course the rules and amounts could change in the future.
Leaving aside the often arcane (but necessary?) florid language employed in such matters, the idea would be: "I leave an amount equal to the applicable maximum IHT nil rate band at that time to Johnny"
And of course the rules and amounts could change in the future.
Leaving aside the often arcane (but necessary?) florid language employed in such matters, the idea would be: "I leave an amount equal to the applicable maximum IHT nil rate band at that time to Johnny"
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:25 am
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
Re: clause in a will
I think the wording Lootman suggests is along the lines you might be thinking, although the reference to the maximum amount might be a bit vague - and might include the value of the house.
However, if you don't specify an amount but set the amount of the bequest by reference to an external figure which can change, you run the risk that the amount is changed significantly so that it exceeds the total value of your estate and therefore no other beneficiaries remain to pay the IHT - so your one legatee gets the full amount (less IHT). Whether this is a realistic risk is another matter.
If you're intending on putting a clause like this in a DIY will, make sure you *know* that the clause will deliver what you intended. Probably best to get advice (and not from someone like me on the internet). (Obviously if CK comes in to this topic, that's a different matter)
However, if you don't specify an amount but set the amount of the bequest by reference to an external figure which can change, you run the risk that the amount is changed significantly so that it exceeds the total value of your estate and therefore no other beneficiaries remain to pay the IHT - so your one legatee gets the full amount (less IHT). Whether this is a realistic risk is another matter.
If you're intending on putting a clause like this in a DIY will, make sure you *know* that the clause will deliver what you intended. Probably best to get advice (and not from someone like me on the internet). (Obviously if CK comes in to this topic, that's a different matter)
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 1397 times
- Been thanked: 3810 times
Re: clause in a will
It is possible to include such a clause, but it's not necessarily a good idea, particularly now that there is also the Residential Nil Rate Band, which may cause confusion.
However, if you have an estate where you're contemplating leaving £325,000 to a beneficiary it would be frankly ridiculous not to take proper, paid for professional advice. The cost in relation to the size of the estate would be minimal, and the consequences of getting it wrong if you attempt a DIY Will could be many times the cost of such advice.
However, if you have an estate where you're contemplating leaving £325,000 to a beneficiary it would be frankly ridiculous not to take proper, paid for professional advice. The cost in relation to the size of the estate would be minimal, and the consequences of getting it wrong if you attempt a DIY Will could be many times the cost of such advice.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 618 times
- Been thanked: 2717 times
Re: clause in a will
My Will does have provisions like that, drawn up by a solicitor. I won't quote it as you should get it done properly.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1344
- Joined: March 27th, 2017, 11:41 am
- Has thanked: 602 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: clause in a will
Heres an example that went all the way to the high court
https://www.taxinsider.co.uk/iht-how-ma ... -giving-ta
The main takeaway point seems to be the usual "Have your will prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced professional"
https://www.taxinsider.co.uk/iht-how-ma ... -giving-ta
The main takeaway point seems to be the usual "Have your will prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced professional"
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 618 times
- Been thanked: 2717 times
Re: clause in a will
Lanark wrote:Heres an example that went all the way to the high court
https://www.taxinsider.co.uk/iht-how-ma ... -giving-ta
The main takeaway point seems to be the usual "Have your will prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced professional"
The other take away point is never leave the residue to a charity!
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1344
- Joined: March 27th, 2017, 11:41 am
- Has thanked: 602 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: clause in a will
scrumpyjack wrote:Lanark wrote:Heres an example that went all the way to the high court
https://www.taxinsider.co.uk/iht-how-ma ... -giving-ta
The main takeaway point seems to be the usual "Have your will prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced professional"
The other take away point is never leave the residue to a charity!
A lot of people leave the residue to a charity so a lot of the court cases involve charities.
If everyone was leaving their residue to the local fish and chip shop, you would probably get a lot of court cases brought by fish and chip shops.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 364
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 4:02 pm
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: clause in a will
Lanark wrote:scrumpyjack wrote:
The other take away point is never leave the residue to a charity!
A lot of people leave the residue to a charity so a lot of the court cases involve charities.
If everyone was leaving their residue to the local fish and chip shop, you would probably get a lot of court cases brought by fish and chip shops.
There's an idea: I'd do the nation more good by leaving money to F&C shops than to most (all?) national charities.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 510 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: clause in a will
re the take away point
I thought that this had been covered many many times....NEVER leave a percentage to charity.
if so desired leave a monetary amount which cannot be contested by charities spending money given by others
**
re my question
the will was drawn by ''qualified' persons
I am updating one section,,,one clause
the amount being paid to an already named beneficiary
at present shown as £xxxx
but I now want to increase that but without the grief of assets other than cash
but am hoping it to be done in a way that does not mean redoing in a few years time..and again
I thought that this had been covered many many times....NEVER leave a percentage to charity.
if so desired leave a monetary amount which cannot be contested by charities spending money given by others
**
re my question
the will was drawn by ''qualified' persons
I am updating one section,,,one clause
the amount being paid to an already named beneficiary
at present shown as £xxxx
but I now want to increase that but without the grief of assets other than cash
but am hoping it to be done in a way that does not mean redoing in a few years time..and again
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3819
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:25 pm
- Has thanked: 1205 times
- Been thanked: 2001 times
Re: clause in a will
mutantpoodle wrote:
re my question
the will was drawn by ''qualified' persons
I am updating one section,,,one clause
the amount being paid to an already named beneficiary
at present shown as £xxxx
but I now want to increase that but without the grief of assets other than cash
but am hoping it to be done in a way that does not mean redoing in a few years time..and again
A codicil amending the amounts? Although you do need to check it doesn't impact other areas of the will (such as increasing a specific beneficiary then transferring your money to a spouse as you get ill and not leaving enough to meet the bequests).
That's what my dad did to use the NRB as it went up before it was transferrable between spouses.
Paul
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 1397 times
- Been thanked: 3810 times
Re: clause in a will
mutantpoodle wrote:the will was drawn by ''qualified' persons
I am updating one section,,,one clause
the amount being paid to an already named beneficiary
at present shown as £xxxx
but I now want to increase that but without the grief of assets other than cash
but am hoping it to be done in a way that does not mean redoing in a few years time..and again
If the Will was drawn by a qualified person then just go back to them - they'll be able to use the standard wording for this clause that all professionals who prepare Wills have in their precedent bank, and it'll only take a few minutes.
Alterations like this were traditionally done by way of a codicil - a separate document - but nowadays if a client wants to amend their Will I just amend the original that's stored on my computer, which is easier and quicker than preparing a codicil. No doubt the lawyer who prepared your Will can do the same.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 510 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: clause in a will
I am aware that a codicil is the way to do it.
its the wording of the actual bequest that I was hoping for assistance with.
the solicitor did it in 2013 and is long gone
its the wording of the actual bequest that I was hoping for assistance with.
the solicitor did it in 2013 and is long gone
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:25 am
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
Re: clause in a will
Seems to me that the risk here (unless done carefully) is that a clause which said something like:
"I leave to X such amount free of Inheritance Tax as is equivalent to the Nil Rate Band for Inheritance Tax at the time of my death"
would be subject to the risk that the IHT regime is changed and the NRB is replaced with some other name. How would you safely write a clause to capture that possibility? What if the NRB was significantly reduced? Or massively increased? Neither possibility is particularly likely, but the risk is I guess non-zero.
Could you inflation link the bequest?
"Such amount as is calculated by dividing £325000 by the value of CPIH at (insert today's date) and multiplying the result by CPIH at the date of my death"
Do NOT rely on the clause above - it's just an example written by an unqualified person, and is not legal advice.
"I leave to X such amount free of Inheritance Tax as is equivalent to the Nil Rate Band for Inheritance Tax at the time of my death"
would be subject to the risk that the IHT regime is changed and the NRB is replaced with some other name. How would you safely write a clause to capture that possibility? What if the NRB was significantly reduced? Or massively increased? Neither possibility is particularly likely, but the risk is I guess non-zero.
Could you inflation link the bequest?
"Such amount as is calculated by dividing £325000 by the value of CPIH at (insert today's date) and multiplying the result by CPIH at the date of my death"
Do NOT rely on the clause above - it's just an example written by an unqualified person, and is not legal advice.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 510 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: clause in a will
FAO Chas49
many thanks indeed
I reckon that sentence will be more than fine.
if NRB changes I can always do another update to the will
it will not be contested as there are no other players in the game
many thanks indeed
I reckon that sentence will be more than fine.
if NRB changes I can always do another update to the will
it will not be contested as there are no other players in the game
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 1397 times
- Been thanked: 3810 times
Re: clause in a will
"Such amount as is calculated by dividing £325000 by the value of CPIH at (insert today's date) and multiplying the result by CPIH at the date of my death"
Have you considered what happens if CPIH is replaced by a different index?
Such a clause would also give a totally different outcome to one linking the legacy to the nil rate band. It could result in a sum that was twice as much, with consequent, possibly drastic, results on the amount of inheritance tax payable and who would suffer the burden of that tax.
If you're happy to accept such a random outcome that's fine, but if a professional will writer used such a clause they'd be dusting off their professional indemnity policy.
Re: clause in a will
What happens if IHT is abolished? Then there'll be no NRB and the beneficiary will get zilch.
And don't say you'll update your will when that happens - you may be incapacitated and so unable to do so.
And don't say you'll update your will when that happens - you may be incapacitated and so unable to do so.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4449
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:14 pm
- Has thanked: 1617 times
- Been thanked: 1611 times
Re: clause in a will
Oswulf wrote:What happens if IHT is abolished? Then there'll be no NRB and the beneficiary will get zilch.
And don't say you'll update your will when that happens - you may be incapacitated and so unable to do so.
Yeah, and what happens if the currency is replaced by the Euro. There will be no more pounds sterling and everyone's wills will fail and no-one will get any inheritance.
![Neutral :-|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
Okay some serious points above and I think the OP needs to carefully reread @Chas49's post which states at the end:
"Do NOT rely on the clause above - it's just an example written by an unqualified person, and is not legal advice."
GS
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 510 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: clause in a will
all points noted with gratitude
I will use Chas49s idea but add in 325000
''I leave 325000 to X or such amount free etc etc''
that should do the trick
thanks again for the ideas and warnings
I will use Chas49s idea but add in 325000
''I leave 325000 to X or such amount free etc etc''
that should do the trick
thanks again for the ideas and warnings
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 233
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:35 am
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 112 times
Re: clause in a will
Someone I know had a will with a reference to NRB with the intention to minimise a potential IHT bill. It made no reference to NRB inherited from spouse and no reference to the family home allowance (as it was drafted before such allowances even existed) with the result that there was a large IHT bill likely. The will was updated. I'd encourage people to regularly review and update their will to avoid such unintended consequences.
Return to “Legal Issues (Practical)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests