Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Shelford,GrahamPlatt,gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown, for Donating to support the site
Fusion Power
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3068 times
Re: Fusion Power
For those within easy travel distance of central London....
The Engineering behind a Fusion Energy experiment
Tuesday 16 May 2023, 6:00pm - 9:00pm, IET London, 2 Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL
UKAEA's 'MAST Upgrade' machine is researching the viability of fusion as a future energy source. Fusion is the reaction that powers the sun and stars. This lecture will be exploring the engineering behind this machine and what it is like to operate this fusion experiment.
https://events.theiet.org/events/the-engineering-behind-a-fusion-energy-experiment/
The Engineering behind a Fusion Energy experiment
Tuesday 16 May 2023, 6:00pm - 9:00pm, IET London, 2 Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL
UKAEA's 'MAST Upgrade' machine is researching the viability of fusion as a future energy source. Fusion is the reaction that powers the sun and stars. This lecture will be exploring the engineering behind this machine and what it is like to operate this fusion experiment.
https://events.theiet.org/events/the-engineering-behind-a-fusion-energy-experiment/
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
Energy based on power of stars is step closer after nuclear fusion heat record
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/08/energy-based-on-power-of-stars-is-step-closer-after-nuclear-fusion-heat-record
Feat by scientists at Oxfordshire facility described as ‘fitting swansong’ for pioneering project as reactor is decommissioned
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/08/energy-based-on-power-of-stars-is-step-closer-after-nuclear-fusion-heat-record
Feat by scientists at Oxfordshire facility described as ‘fitting swansong’ for pioneering project as reactor is decommissioned
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 390
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:45 pm
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 274 times
Re: Fusion Power
I read this article, or the equivalent one, on the BBC. It is quite depressing really. This is the first time this millennium that fuel (deuterium and tritium) have been tested in the Culham Tokamak. Meanwhile ITER in France is about ten years behind schedule, and to quote the BBC, it is due to open in 2025, but won't start doing experiments until 2035. The UK hasn't been part of the project since Brexit. I really hope that means we haven't been wasting money on it.
I can but hope that some of the private venture fusion companies make better progress.
I can but hope that some of the private venture fusion companies make better progress.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1572 times
- Been thanked: 983 times
Re: Fusion Power
Bminusrob wrote:I read this article, or the equivalent one, on the BBC. It is quite depressing really. This is the first time this millennium that fuel (deuterium and tritium) have been tested in the Culham Tokamak. Meanwhile ITER in France is about ten years behind schedule, and to quote the BBC, it is due to open in 2025, but won't start doing experiments until 2035. The UK hasn't been part of the project since Brexit. I really hope that means we haven't been wasting money on it.
I can but hope that some of the private venture fusion companies make better progress.
The whole problem with jet is one of near impossible challenges. Where ever you look they are at the limits of material science, plasma heating, plasma containment, radiation protection etc etc.
Even if all of these issues are over come you would only have a steam making machine that might reach an efficiency of 50%, need regular maintenance & cost a fortune both to build, service & fuel.
Any power generation that is designed to create heat, then steam, then electricity is so last century.
Some of the private companies seek to go from fusion to electricity which is better, but they are very expensive tiny fish in a market where fusion has no hope of competing with the fusion reactor that is the sun, especially if solar can go to orbit & beam power down. There are other technologies being thought about such as extracting power from virtual particles, a sort of Hawking radiation where some of the energy of virtual particle or anti particle are collected before they recombine, but these ideas are abstract theoretical possibilities with no experimental tests as far as I know.
Every now & then some one talks about laser fusion, but the folk in the field say this is all about developing better hydrogen bombs & the recent demonstration of laser fusion in the US was all for defense, despite many popular channels saying it was for civil power, in direct contradiction to what the folk doing the work said.
Regards,
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:38 pm
- Has thanked: 149 times
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Fusion Power
odysseus2000 wrote:Bminusrob wrote:I read this article, or the equivalent one, on the BBC. It is quite depressing really. This is the first time this millennium that fuel (deuterium and tritium) have been tested in the Culham Tokamak. Meanwhile ITER in France is about ten years behind schedule, and to quote the BBC, it is due to open in 2025, but won't start doing experiments until 2035. The UK hasn't been part of the project since Brexit. I really hope that means we haven't been wasting money on it.
I can but hope that some of the private venture fusion companies make better progress.
The whole problem with jet is one of near impossible challenges. Where ever you look they are at the limits of material science, plasma heating, plasma containment, radiation protection etc etc.
Even if all of these issues are over come you would only have a steam making machine that might reach an efficiency of 50%, need regular maintenance & cost a fortune both to build, service & fuel.
Any power generation that is designed to create heat, then steam, then electricity is so last century.
Some of the private companies seek to go from fusion to electricity which is better, but they are very expensive tiny fish in a market where fusion has no hope of competing with the fusion reactor that is the sun, especially if solar can go to orbit & beam power down. There are other technologies being thought about such as extracting power from virtual particles, a sort of Hawking radiation where some of the energy of virtual particle or anti particle are collected before they recombine, but these ideas are abstract theoretical possibilities with no experimental tests as far as I know.
Every now & then some one talks about laser fusion, but the folk in the field say this is all about developing better hydrogen bombs & the recent demonstration of laser fusion in the US was all for defense, despite many popular channels saying it was for civil power, in direct contradiction to what the folk doing the work said.
Regards,
But what a beautiful steam engine! I wouldn't knock it, it's both new and traditional. We actually understand the steam bit.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1572 times
- Been thanked: 983 times
Re: Fusion Power
Sorcery
But what a beautiful steam engine! I wouldn't knock it, it's both new and traditional. We actually understand the steam bit.
Yes, our Victorian ancestors understood the steam bit & back then it was so amazing & new, but nowadays it belongs in the history books: inefficient, expensive to build, maintain & run & prone to breaking down in all manner of inconvenient ways.
Regards,
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
odysseus2000 wrote:The whole problem with jet is one of near impossible challenges. Where ever you look they are at the limits of material science, plasma heating, plasma containment, radiation protection etc etc.
Why was radiation protection such a challenge for JET?
odysseus2000 wrote:Every now & then some one talks about laser fusion, but the folk in the field say this is all about developing better hydrogen bombs & the recent demonstration of laser fusion in the US was all for defense, despite many popular channels saying it was for civil power, in direct contradiction to what the folk doing the work said.
Yes it was, which is why the intermittency really didn't matter. But I could never understand how you could expect to go from the US National Ignition Facility to a continuous power generator.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1572 times
- Been thanked: 983 times
Re: Fusion Power
XFool wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:The whole problem with jet is one of near impossible challenges. Where ever you look they are at the limits of material science, plasma heating, plasma containment, radiation protection etc etc.
Why was radiation protection such a challenge for JET?odysseus2000 wrote:Every now & then some one talks about laser fusion, but the folk in the field say this is all about developing better hydrogen bombs & the recent demonstration of laser fusion in the US was all for defense, despite many popular channels saying it was for civil power, in direct contradiction to what the folk doing the work said.
Yes it was, which is why the intermittency really didn't matter. But I could never understand how you could expect to go from the US National Ignition Facility to a continuous power generator.
Fusion creates lots of neutrons & they activate everything with half lives of decades, so that if you can get a fusion reactor to work, you will have to leave it 50+ years to decommission it after its lifetime, but if you have maintenance then it’s all about remote repair with robots.
Laser fusion is, at least for now, a way to study the conditions needed for an hydrogen bomb to operate. This took Teller et al a bit of time to work out, but once it was realized that the energy from the fission detonator could be focused on the fusion explosive, it became rather easy to make hydrogen bombs as once you set off the fusion explosive you get loads of neutrons that split the outer fission shell giving overall a gain of circa one thousand. Hiroshima needed 1 g of mass converted to energy, fusion bombs convert 1 kg+ of mass into energy.
Regards,
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: December 9th, 2016, 6:44 am
- Has thanked: 237 times
- Been thanked: 312 times
Re: Fusion Power
odysseus2000 wrote:Sorcery
But what a beautiful steam engine! I wouldn't knock it, it's both new and traditional. We actually understand the steam bit.
Yes, our Victorian ancestors understood the steam bit & back then it was so amazing & new, but nowadays it belongs in the history books: inefficient, expensive to build, maintain & run & prone to breaking down in all manner of inconvenient ways.
Did the Victorians understood everything about steam?
Practical super-critical steam generators and turbines are definitely post-Victorian. Perhaps we need a distinction between science and engineering, The engineering was certainly beyond the limits of Victorian material science, so there was a conflict between improved Carnot efficiency and shrapnel in the powerhouse.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1572 times
- Been thanked: 983 times
Re: Fusion Power
9873210 wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:
Yes, our Victorian ancestors understood the steam bit & back then it was so amazing & new, but nowadays it belongs in the history books: inefficient, expensive to build, maintain & run & prone to breaking down in all manner of inconvenient ways.
Did the Victorians understood everything about steam?
Practical super-critical steam generators and turbines are definitely post-Victorian. Perhaps we need a distinction between science and engineering, The engineering was certainly beyond the limits of Victorian material science, so there was a conflict between improved Carnot efficiency and shrapnel in the powerhouse.
Most of the laws of thermodynamics were known by the 1860’s, with the third law somewhere around 1915:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics
But for most practical purposes the laws were known to the Victorians & they had great skill in the metallurgy of steel, creating things like the Maxim gun in the 1880’s:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxim_gun
Many of the more modern developments came with new materials & better ways to quantify metals & alloys, but as far as I am aware the steam engine was perfected into a practical technology by the Victorians & the fastest railway variants were made in the 1930’s, but perhaps there were innovations that I am nor aware of that gave the 1930’s steam rail engines their record setting performance. Please post if I am missing something.
Regards,
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1572 times
- Been thanked: 983 times
Re: Fusion Power
Sabine talks Fusion. An idea to control fusion plasma with AI (7 mins+):
https://youtu.be/4VD_DLPQJBU?si=J5ZGor45Pp6yfFpW
Still extremely elementary, but may be interesting background for some.
Regards,
https://youtu.be/4VD_DLPQJBU?si=J5ZGor45Pp6yfFpW
Still extremely elementary, but may be interesting background for some.
Regards,
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest