## Search found 2565 matches

- December 10th, 2018, 8:53 pm
- Forum: Bank Accounts Savings & ISAs
- Topic: Have Nationwide online Accounts?
- Replies:
**0** - Views:
**52**

### Have Nationwide online Accounts?

I have accidentally stumbled upon the fact there is a potentially serious flaw in Nationwide's online banking UI and processes, it is presumably already known to others. It isn't a security problem. If you have to file an Income Tax Return with HMRC and use online Nationwide interest bearing account...

- December 10th, 2018, 7:40 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

BTW. Anyone know why mirrors reverse left to right but not top to bottom? :twisted: Eh? Write something on a piece of paper. Stand in front of a mirror while holding the paper, words facing you, with your left hand holding the middle of the left side and your right hand holding the middle of the ri...

- December 10th, 2018, 6:11 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

BTW. Anyone know why mirrors reverse left to right but not top to bottom? :twisted: Eh? Write something on a piece of paper. Stand in front of a mirror while holding the paper, words facing you, with your left hand holding the middle of the left side and your right hand holding the middle of the ri...

- December 10th, 2018, 1:21 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

The computer scientist in me is saying that spaces aren't significant, other than as separators when necessary (and obviously not necessary in this case). ... I stand by the first part of the post though. Yes, a computer would ignore all the spaces. But a human likely wouldn't. To a human (at least...

- December 10th, 2018, 12:31 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

The computer scientist in me is saying that spaces aren't significant, other than as separators when necessary (and obviously not necessary in this case). So 6 / 2(2+1) is the same as 6/2(2+1) and 6/2 * (2+1). If BODMAS didn't mean D before M and A before S, there wouldn't be much point to it. So p...

- December 10th, 2018, 11:37 am
- Forum: Music, Theatre, TV and Film
- Topic: Format of Old TV programmes
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**76**

### Re: Format of Old TV programmes

Blimey! Result!

It's just come back from an ad break (in widescreen, obviously) and is now displaying in widescreen - 14:9 in my case.

Weird...

Somebody forgot to throw a switch? Somebody rang up to complain? Electronics not working correctly somewhere?

It's just come back from an ad break (in widescreen, obviously) and is now displaying in widescreen - 14:9 in my case.

Weird...

Somebody forgot to throw a switch? Somebody rang up to complain? Electronics not working correctly somewhere?

- December 10th, 2018, 11:20 am
- Forum: Music, Theatre, TV and Film
- Topic: Format of Old TV programmes
- Replies:
**1** - Views:
**76**

### Format of Old TV programmes

I know I have asked a similar (possibly even the same!) question before, likely on TMF... I am watching The Bill (Again?) on Drama. They are from around 2001. I'm watching on an old 4:3 CRT receiver (not sure that's important) with a digibox set (still) to normally display in the compromise 14:9 for...

- December 10th, 2018, 10:59 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

BTW.

Anyone know why mirrors reverse left to right but not top to bottom?

Anyone know why mirrors reverse left to right but not top to bottom?

- December 10th, 2018, 10:41 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

My hand calculator says it's 1. My Windows Scientific Calculator won't commit itself... Actually it gives 2, as it throws out the first 2 to evaluate 6/(2+1), with a chained calculation. Of course, if you calculate intermediate results.. Actually, if you calculate intermediate results left to right...

- December 10th, 2018, 10:30 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

PinkDalek wrote:XFool wrote:Now, clever clogs, what's the 'answer' to: 6/2(2+1)?

Start here viewtopic.php?f=9&t=15165.

No.

Start here: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=15165#p185788

- December 10th, 2018, 10:26 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

richlist wrote:......and my brain tells me the answer is 9

Do we really have to revert to name calling ?

There are two different opinions......

Exactly.

"Is this a drawing of a cube going into the page or out of the page?"

- December 10th, 2018, 10:19 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

The OP clarified his OP here https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=185744#p185744 The formula is (6/2)(2+1) The answer is nine. Fools have been carrying on regardless. ;) Yeah. The answer to (6/2)(2+1) is undoubtedly 9. Now, clever clogs, what's the 'answer' to: 6/2(2+1) ? My hand calculator ...

- December 10th, 2018, 10:16 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

1. The clickbait article linked to contains items of complete nonsense. Even that article, after declaring the correct answer to be '9', goes on to declare that it could also be '1' if you were using an earlier in the 20th century interpretation of BODMAS! As an aside, I can't even remember BODMAS ...

- December 10th, 2018, 10:05 am
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

From a computing perspective 6/2(2+1)=6/2*(2+1) Which only has one possible result and is not the same as 6/(2*(2+1)) From the perspective of whose "computer"; or which "computer"? From a Microsoft Windows 8.0, Scientific Calculator perspective: 6/2*(2+1) is undoubtedly 9, where...

- December 9th, 2018, 11:54 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

With these values for a , b and c , what I am saying through my inequality is that 6/2(2+1) is not the same as 6/(2(2+1)). But, as they are different expressions - with the first seeming ambiguous and the second being unambiguous - how does that help? 6/2(2+1) is 9, whereas 6/(2(2+1)) is 1. 6/(2(2+...

- December 9th, 2018, 11:16 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

Putting =6/2*(2+1) into excel gives the answer 9. You think that's a recommendation? :) The Windows(8) Scientific Calculator refuses to even enter it as given (probably wisely). My hand calculator gives the answer as 1. :shock: P.S. But you haven't gone with the original expression, which I did abo...

- December 9th, 2018, 7:21 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

Can a Mathematician put me out of my misery? I've been following a discussion on a Facebook group about the BODMAS rules, i.e. the order in which mathematical functions should be performed: Brackets..Order...Division etc. The simple sum causing confusion is: 6 / 2(2+1) = ? Obviously the / is the sy...

- December 9th, 2018, 6:20 pm
- Forum: Does anyone know?
- Topic: The BODMAS mathematical rule.
- Replies:
**51** - Views:
**712**

### Re: The BODMAS mathematical rule.

All just goes to show that Reverse Polish Notation is much better.

- December 7th, 2018, 11:46 pm
- Forum: Polite Discussions
- Topic: Trump
- Replies:
**66** - Views:
**2566**

### Re: Gravity

I caught the tail end of a Jim Al-Khalili program on Gravity last night where he said that stuff seems to fall in the direction in which time flows faster, Actually, in which time flows slower . https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/apr/14/elastic-concept-order-of-time-carlo-rovelli does that mean...