88V8 wrote:mc2fool wrote:SalvorHardin wrote:mc2fool wrote:Arborbridge wrote:I deduce that all the posters who use LMF now are probably not running anti-malware program as sensitive as Malwarebytes, or have taken the risk of making this address "safe".
No, I use Firefox with the Malwarebytes add-on and I haven't needed to add this site to the "allow" list and have never had it block the site. I have no explanation as to why you but not me....
I think that those of us who are getting the problem are running the MalwareBytes program (the latest premium version is 4.5.19), whereas you are running the MalwareBytes Browser Guard add-on for Firefox. MalwareBytes is a very zealous program.
I am, in fact, also running MalwareBytes 4.5.19 but the free version, so, yes, that could well be the difference.
The site is in my Favourites so I just type Le and hit the Enter key.
I have the paid version of MWB. So your cheapskate version doesn't get in the way while my paid version does.
Hmmm.
V8
LOL! Well the free version doesn't have any real time protections, so I think they would argue that you are getting what you paid for: real time protection against a (allegedly) dodgy site.
However, the free version pretty much constantly has a "14 day premium trial" offer so I've just turned that on and lo-and-behold I now get the "
SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length" error. And adding
http://www.lemonfool.co.uk to the allow list doesn't help, I have to add the IP address. (Also trying to add
http://www.lemonfool.co.uk actually doesn't do anything as it strips out the http:// and leaves just the one entry without it. Ditto for https://)
What's also curious is the relationship between MalwareBytes (free and/or premium) and the MalwareBytes Browser Guard add-on. The latter certainly does block me occasionally for some (usually, AFAICS, OK) site, but not for TLF....