Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site
Premium Bonds
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 818
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 7:29 pm
- Has thanked: 200 times
- Been thanked: 378 times
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 655
- Joined: August 31st, 2018, 9:08 pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 251 times
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 579
- Joined: November 11th, 2016, 12:53 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
Re: Premium Bonds
2 x £25 on 80K.....to quote someone who ran rings around me playing football.....better luck next time pal..
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 527
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 1:25 am
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 212 times
Re: Premium Bonds
There was an interesting article in the Telegraph on premium bonds
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-ba ... elsewhere/
But behind a paywall.
The particularly interesting bit to me is:
The 1.4pc "prize rate" figure is distorted by because more than half of total PBs are held by the 3.6pc of bondholders who have between £40,000 and £50,000 invested.
£50,000 in PBs gives you an 87% chance of winning a prize every month. So, bondholders with smaller stakes have a lower effective chance of winning anything and a lower “interest rate”.
torata
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-ba ... elsewhere/
But behind a paywall.
The particularly interesting bit to me is:
The 1.4pc "prize rate" figure is distorted by because more than half of total PBs are held by the 3.6pc of bondholders who have between £40,000 and £50,000 invested.
£50,000 in PBs gives you an 87% chance of winning a prize every month. So, bondholders with smaller stakes have a lower effective chance of winning anything and a lower “interest rate”.
torata
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 3661 times
Re: Premium Bonds
torata wrote:There was an interesting article in the Telegraph on premium bonds
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-ba ... elsewhere/
But behind a paywall.
The particularly interesting bit to me is:
The 1.4pc "prize rate" figure is distorted by because more than half of total PBs are held by the 3.6pc of bondholders who have between £40,000 and £50,000 invested.
£50,000 in PBs gives you an 87% chance of winning a prize every month. So, bondholders with smaller stakes have a lower effective chance of winning anything and a lower “interest rate”.
If you google the text "Premium Bonds paid out a record number of times in 2018" you can find the article elsewhere without a paywall.
It doesn't explain the maths behind the 'bondholders with smaller stakes have a lower effective chance of winning anything and a lower “interest rate”' statement. I'm not sure I follow the reasoning.
Scott.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
- Has thanked: 1195 times
- Been thanked: 903 times
Re: Premium Bonds
I should have thought it was pretty obvious. With £50k invested, I should be rather cheesed off if I had only the same chance of winning a prize as someone with only £1. Nevertheless, if you look at the major prize winners each month, it is clear that some of the big prizes are won by holders of few bonds whereas I am still waiting for a biggie. I think one's chance of winning is improved if all one's bonds are in one block rather than split up into groups bought on different dates. I might sell all mine and repurchase in one block.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 3661 times
Re: Premium Bonds
Bouleversee wrote:I should have thought it was pretty obvious. With £50k invested, I should be rather cheesed off if I had only the same chance of winning a prize as someone with only £1.
Er, no. It says there's a lower percentage chance.
Scott.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 1523 times
Re: Premium Bonds
Bouleversee wrote:I think one's chance of winning is improved if all one's bonds are in one block rather than split up into groups bought on different dates. I might sell all mine and repurchase in one block.
I wouldn't do that personally, as I think your reasoning is wrong. In fact you will I think miss out because:
Your Bonds become eligible for the draw one full calendar month after you buy them. So when you buy Bonds in November, they’ll be in every draw from January.
RC
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6385
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1882 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
Re: Premium Bonds
have they sent the emails yet ? Appreciate this may take hours/days so some may have received, others not
I'm waiting for an email this month rather than the instant disappointment online
I'm waiting for an email this month rather than the instant disappointment online
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6385
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1882 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
Re: Premium Bonds
Bouleversee wrote:... I think one's chance of winning is improved if all one's bonds are in one block rather than split up into groups bought on different dates. I might sell all mine and repurchase in one block.
No, no difference at all (as per RC's post)
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 1523 times
Re: Premium Bonds
AleisterCrowley wrote:have they sent the emails yet ? Appreciate this may take hours/days so some may have received, others not
I'm waiting for an email this month rather than the instant disappointment online
Yes, got mine earlier today - 2 x £25
RC
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6385
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1882 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Premium Bonds
swill453 wrote:torata wrote:There was an interesting article in the Telegraph on premium bonds
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-ba ... elsewhere/
But behind a paywall.
The particularly interesting bit to me is:
The 1.4pc "prize rate" figure is distorted by because more than half of total PBs are held by the 3.6pc of bondholders who have between £40,000 and £50,000 invested.
£50,000 in PBs gives you an 87% chance of winning a prize every month. So, bondholders with smaller stakes have a lower effective chance of winning anything and a lower “interest rate”.
If you google the text "Premium Bonds paid out a record number of times in 2018" you can find the article elsewhere without a paywall.
It doesn't explain the maths behind the 'bondholders with smaller stakes have a lower effective chance of winning anything and a lower “interest rate”' statement. I'm not sure I follow the reasoning.
Scott.
What's to explain?
Obviously, if you have significantly fewer 'tickets' in a lottery than somebody else, then you have a lower chance of winning than they do! Ergo - over say one year, your return WILL (on average*) be expected to be lower than theirs. Simples!
The Bond fund may well pay out at a rate of 1.4% pa. But, typically, nobody can reasonably expect to get that much during a year. Your reasonable expectation is to get less than this (and you typically do). The larger your holding the higher your expected return - but don't expect it to normally equal or exceed the Bond fund rate*. Indeed, if you have lower that a few thousand, you can easily end up with a 0% return in a year*.
* But not if you get lucky and win big. It's all a lottery.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 3661 times
Re: Premium Bonds
XFool wrote:What's to explain?
Obviously, if you have significantly fewer 'tickets' in a lottery than somebody else, then you have a lower chance of winning than they do! Ergo - over say one year, your return WILL (on average*) be expected to be lower than theirs. Simples!
That's obvious. But it's not what the article is saying.
It says 'smaller stakes have ... a lower “interest rate”'. Not the same thing at all.
Scott.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Premium Bonds
AleisterCrowley wrote:ta, possibly a big fat zero for me then Or I'm later in the batch
Hang on! That Agent Millions may still be trying to beat a track to your front door.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Premium Bonds
swill453 wrote:XFool wrote:What's to explain?
Obviously, if you have significantly fewer 'tickets' in a lottery than somebody else, then you have a lower chance of winning than they do! Ergo - over say one year, your return WILL (on average*) be expected to be lower than theirs. Simples!
That's obvious. But it's not what the article is saying.
It says 'smaller stakes have ... a lower “interest rate”'. Not the same thing at all.
Scott.
Well first of all, beware of using the term "interest rate" (WRT bond prizes, not the bond fund).
Last time I made that mistake around here I had a certain proponent of High Yield Share portfolios down on my neck like a ton of bricks.
I think we will be safe if we use the word 'return'. It is a well known fact(?) that the annual return is lower for smaller holdings and higher for larger holdings. Why? Well, the return from the bonds is quantised, not continuous. You cannot win £1.4 pa on your £100 PBs, the minimum winning amount is £25. So, in any one year, with £100 PBs you would reasonably expect to win NOTHING. Obviously, with larger holdings you can expect to win £25 in a year, indeed with a large enough holding you can reasonably expect to win that, or more, in each monthly draw - and you do.
So: Large holdings, you can reasonably expect to get an annual % return; Small holdings - It's a lottery!
Last edited by XFool on September 4th, 2019, 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 969
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:17 pm
- Has thanked: 112 times
- Been thanked: 271 times
Re: Premium Bonds
XFool wrote:swill453 wrote:XFool wrote:What's to explain?
Obviously, if you have significantly fewer 'tickets' in a lottery than somebody else, then you have a lower chance of winning than they do! Ergo - over say one year, your return WILL (on average*) be expected to be lower than theirs. Simples!
That's obvious. But it's not what the article is saying.
It says 'smaller stakes have ... a lower “interest rate”'. Not the same thing at all.
Scott.
Well first of all, beware of using the term "interest rate" (WRT bond prizes, not the bond fund).
Last time I made that mistake around here I had a certain proponent of High Yield Share portfolios down on my neck like a ton of bricks.
I think we will be safe if we use the word 'return'. It is a well known fact(?) that the annual return is lower for smaller holdings and higher for larger holdings. Why? Well, the return from the bonds is quantised, not continuous. You cannot win £1.4 pa on your £100 PBs, the minimum winning amount is £25. So, in any one year, with £100 PBs you would reasonably expect to win NOTHING. Obviously, with large holdings you can expect to win £25 in a year, indeed with a large enough holding you can reasonably expect to win that, or more, in each monthly draw - and you do.
So: Large holdings, you can reasonably expect to get an annual % return; Small holdings - It's a lottery!
What is the definition of a "large holding"? Recently a million pound prize was won with a holding of around £4000 in bonds.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 500
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:57 pm
- Has thanked: 535 times
- Been thanked: 226 times
Re: Premium Bonds
So the article says 'smaller stakes . . . have a lower "interest rate" '. So if you look at 500 holders with £100 stakes and compare their combined winnings to one holder with a £50,000 holding over a period of time, they will on average win less? That doesn't sound right to me.
If you have a larger stake you have a more reliable income stream (but still very lumpy), but that's all I would think.
If you have a larger stake you have a more reliable income stream (but still very lumpy), but that's all I would think.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Premium Bonds
Mike88 wrote:What is the definition of a "large holding"? Recently a million pound prize was won with a holding of around £4000 in bonds.
It's a choice. My definition would be that the 'very minimum' holding would be the number that can reasonably be expected to win one prize in one year. Although, with that and the variability of returns from a lottery you could easily fail to win anything in one year.
Originally I started with enough to expect to win at least two prizes in a year, later I moved to four prizes a year then to just larger amounts. The lower the expected number of prizes in a year then, obviously, the higher the chance of failing to win anything.
Just start with the current chance of winning any prize with one bond in one draw (now only 30,000 : 1?) and go from there to work out how many prizes you can reasonably expect to win in a year. The expected 'return' rate in a year is (expected annual winnings)/(Amount held).
Winning £1m on a holding of £4000 is just sheer luck. But then, winning £1m is sheer luck on ANY holding of PBs as you cannot hold enough bonds for long enough to come within striking distance of reasonably expecting to win £1m in one year or longer. Obviously the more bonds you have the greater the chance you will get lucky.
Return to “Bank Accounts Savings & ISAs”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests