idpickering wrote:I'm not a fan of niche type retail shares, although MKS can barely be described as such maybe.
Eh? I can see no way whatsoever to regard M&S as a "niche type retail share" - not even barely. The things it sells are mainly everyday necessities - food and clothing - rather than specialised items that no-one actually
needs and the market for which could vanish as a result of a change in fashion. They
are an upmarket retailer of such things and their market could decrease as a result of economic pressures on their customers, and that produces some risks that differ from those of other supermarket-type companies - but they're quite different from those faced by niche retailers and I really don't think it at all helpful to regard them as a niche retailer.
By the way, 'different' means just that - no implication of 'less'. With M&S being an upmarket supermarket-type company, there are risks it faces that niche retailers don't. For instance, Aldi and Lidl are competitors with M&S as retailers of everyday necessities (though not particularly close competitors), whereas they're simply not competitors at all with true niche retailers: your local stained-glass shop or whatever need not be concerned about them taking its customers away!
And M&S do of course sell
some specialised, non-necessity items - but so do Tesco for instance if you look in the right places in their supermarkets...
Finally, don't take any of the above as saying that I think M&S is an excellent HYP company: I don't! I've held it for a long time (my oldest holding goes back to a single-company PEP I bought in the last couple of years of PEPs, which makes it a bit over 20 years old, though that holding wasn't bought on the yet-to-be-defined HYP criteria) and it's thrown off the dividends pretty reliably. But growth in either capital or dividend terms has been distinctly thin on the ground... Its school report is definitely a mass of "Could do better"s, but it hasn't quite qualified for expulsion as far as I am concerned!
Gengulphus