Dod101 wrote:To be honest, I am not sure that this thread is very helpful as not all are reporting on the same basis.
Dod
I agree in that people have their own different approaches and frankly I'd prefer something more standardised. Each year we have a selection of reports which are generally informative, though one does (as you imply) have to be careful to read between the lines or ask subsidiary questions about those results. However, I do not think the difficulty of comparison should prevent us from trying.
There is a core who runs HYPs which are unitised, and it is those people who are more likely to produces "apple" which can be compared with "apples" - we rely on those to show whether or not HYP is working. Without them, there would be no evidence at all outside HYP1, and a sample of one is hardly convincing.
So, you could be a positive help to get us all reporting on the same basis, which as you point out is the key problem. You can do this quite simply by unitising and joining in . Or you could just be negative and undermine our efforts: your choice.
Hopefully when all dividends are in you will let us have something more exact* - which is when most people will come in. However, I started this thread early so it will run for the duration across to the new year and act as a repositiory for headline results - someone else started it last year and it worked quite well.
* you say you can't bothered, but it's hardly any effort. There are only a few dividends due in December and they are all listed in itsallaguess's post earlier this month. You know your number of shares, divs in pence and the main effort would be lifting a calculator out of a drawer. Bingo! Job done.