https://www.stockopedia.com/content/how-i-build-an-hyp-459388/
Minor mis-spelling in subject line corrected. -- MDW1954
Thanks to Anonymous,bruncher,niord,gvonge,Shelford, for Donating to support the site
Gromley wrote:It's just like deja vu all over again!
SLA Standard Life Aberdeen
VOD Vodafone
IMB Imperial Brands
The main characteristics of my HYP strategy are to choose high yielding UK big caps, widely diversified with equal investment in each industry and totalling 15-20 sectors.
Raptor wrote:SLA Standard Life Aberdeen
VOD Vodafone
IMB Imperial Brands
The first 2 I would avoid at the moment but do have in my portfolio. I have recently brought into IMB, so far 3 out of 3 for me. I still am unsure of VODs continued Yield and I do like SLA but feel that they are still "morphing" and wonder how they will look in the end.
Raptor
Then just do nothing and enjoy the income
Arborbridge wrote:SLA does not have a five year record in this form- so he is taking Gengulphus's definition of continuity.
moorfield wrote:
I'm guessing many here are not actually using HYP as PYAD championed to produce their pensions. Here's a handy reminder, again from that linked article.Then just do nothing and enjoy the income
moorfield wrote:I'm guessing many here are not actually using HYP as PYAD championed to produce their pensions. Here's a handy reminder, again from that linked article.Then just do nothing and enjoy the income
DrBunsenHoneydew wrote:New series for 2019 How I build an HYP
https://www.stockopedia.com/content/how-i-build-an-hyp-459388/Moderator Message:
Minor mis-spelling in subject line corrected. -- MDW1954
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:DrBunsenHoneydew wrote:New series for 2019 How I build an HYP
https://www.stockopedia.com/content/how-i-build-an-hyp-459388/Moderator Message:
Minor mis-spelling in subject line corrected. -- MDW1954
According to Raptor's post one of the Stocks picks was IMB.
Now whilst I don't have a strict HYP, I do own several popular HYP shares one of which is IMB, so I'd be very interested in you sharing Stephen Bland's rationale for this stock.
For me, I like the dividend, my impression of the CEOs competence, and the fact that in addition to diversification from tobacco to Vapes, IMB are also making investments into medicinal cannabis in the form of Oxford Cannabinoid.
However the downside for me of IMB is it's high EBITDA leverage, it's reduction of retained earnings down into negative terrority.
So if you could share any of what was written regards this company I'd be very grateful.
thanks Matt
Gengulphus wrote:Arborbridge wrote:SLA does not have a five year record in this form- so he is taking Gengulphus's definition of continuity.
Sorry, I don't remember defining continuity (*) - so if I have done so, please remind me, and if I haven't, please tell me what you're talking about!
(*) At least, not in a HYP or investment sense - and I certainly don't claim responsibility for any of the mathematical definitions! ;-)
Gengulphus
Arborbridge wrote:Gengulphus wrote:Arborbridge wrote:SLA does not have a five year record in this form- so he is taking Gengulphus's definition of continuity.
Sorry, I don't remember defining continuity (*) - so if I have done so, please remind me, and if I haven't, please tell me what you're talking about!
(*) At least, not in a HYP or investment sense - and I certainly don't claim responsibility for any of the mathematical definitions! ;-)
Gengulphus
Sorry Gengulphus if I have taken you out of context, or misquoted.
Actually, on a quick look back at various threads, I cannot even find the conversation! However, what I thought you wrote was in a discussion about whether SLA could be regarded as a continuity of either Standard Life or Aberdeen. You mentioned deciding this by using the company's registered number. Leading on from this, I posited that perhaps PYAD was treating SLA's history not as a new entity (which would therefore have too short a dividend record) but as a continuation of one of its previous company names - in which case the dividend record could be said to be greater than five years.
That's all I intended.
Arb.
The only objective way of deciding the matter that I'm aware of is a technicality: Standard Life Aberdeen is the same company (number SC286832) as Standard Life, having only changed its name, and not the same company as Aberdeen Asset Management (number SC082015) - the links are to the Companies House records for the companies. But the only practical purpose I know of for which that's still relevant is that if you had a certificated holding in one of the original companies, your old share certificate would have become invalid and you would have received a new certificate during the merger if it was Aberdeen Asset Management, but if it was Standard Life, your old share certificate will probably have remained valid. In essence, the company number on a share certificate is what identifies the company, while the name on the certificate only describes the company as it was when the certificate was issued.
kempiejon wrote:I remember that viewtopic.php?f=15&t=16727&p=207426&hilit=compaines+House+SLA#p207426The only objective way of deciding the matter that I'm aware of is a technicality: Standard Life Aberdeen is the same company (number SC286832) as Standard Life, having only changed its name, and not the same company as Aberdeen Asset Management (number SC082015) - the links are to the Companies House records for the companies. But the only practical purpose I know of for which that's still relevant is that if you had a certificated holding in one of the original companies, your old share certificate would have become invalid and you would have received a new certificate during the merger if it was Aberdeen Asset Management, but if it was Standard Life, your old share certificate will probably have remained valid. In essence, the company number on a share certificate is what identifies the company, while the name on the certificate only describes the company as it was when the certificate was issued.
Return to “HYP Practical (See Group Guidelines)”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests