Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site

TJH Portfolio adjustment

For discussion of the practicalities of setting up and operating income-portfolios which follow the HYP Group Guidelines. READ Guidelines before posting
Forum rules
Tight HYP discussions only please - OT please discuss in strategies
tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#566771

Postby tjh290633 » February 7th, 2023, 10:27 am

Today, thanks to incoming dividends, I have added 20% to my holding of Aviva (AV.) at 446p, it being the highest ranking eligible share for topping up. This moves it from 25th ranked by weight to 5th, which is an indication of how closely the shares are now grouped about the median weight.

My top-up table now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD+ 1 BHP 7.28% 1 VOD 4.69%
2 BT.A+ 2 RIO 5.41% 2 IGG 4.63%
3 RIO* 3 S32 5.31% 3 PHP 4.53%
4 ADM* 4 TW. 4.91% 4 LLOY 4.42%
5 PHP+ 5 LGEN 4.59% 5 BLND 4.37%
6 BATS 6 ADM 4.54% 6 BT.A 4.34%
7 TSCO 7 IMB 4.30% 7 AV. 4.04%
8 RKT 8 VOD 4.14% 8 TW. 4.04%
9 ULVR 9 BATS 4.09% 9 LGEN 3.83%
10 LLOY+ 10 AV. 3.58% 10 WDS 3.60%
11 SGRO 11 IGG 3.33% 11 GSK 3.42%
12 IGG+ 12 BLND 3.21% 12 IMB 3.39%
13 IMB* 13 PHP 3.09% 13 BP. 3.38%
14 LGEN* 14 NG. 3.08% 14 TSCO 3.34%
15 GSK 15 SSE 3.07% 15 BATS 3.32%
16 SSE 16 SMDS 2.85% 16 KGF 3.22%
17 BHP* 17 KGF 2.72% 17 PSON 3.03%
18 TATE 18 WDS 2.71% 18 SHEL 3.02%
19 WDS 19 BP. 2.67% 19 SSE 2.97%
20 UU. 20 BT.A 2.46% 20 HLN 2.77%

As always I disqualify any share which if added to by 20%, would provide more than 5% of the dividend income(*) or account for more than 5% of portfolio cost(+). I no longer hold any share not paying a dividend. BATS therefore ranks highest for topping up at the moment, actually level with TSCO, but has the higher yield. That looks like being the end of March before the next opportunity.

My portfolio now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 BHP 3.78% 128.1%
2 S32 3.30% 111.7%
3 TW. 3.29% 111.3%
4 SMDS 3.20% 108.4%
5 AV. 3.20% 108.3%
6 BP. 3.20% 108.3%
7 DGE 3.19% 108.1%
8 BLND 3.16% 107.1%
9 IMI 3.15% 106.9%
10 LGEN 3.15% 106.8%
11 BA. 3.12% 105.6%
12 IMB 3.11% 105.4%
13 NG. 3.11% 105.2%
14 KGF 3.08% 104.3%
15 AZN 3.07% 103.8%
16 SSE 3.02% 102.3%
17 IGG 2.99% 101.3%
18 WDS 2.95% 100.0%
19 ADM 2.94% 99.7%
20 BATS 2.93% 99.2%
21 UU. 2.89% 98.1%
22 SHEL 2.89% 97.9%
23 RIO 2.85% 96.7%
24 PHP 2.70% 91.6%
25 PSON 2.69% 91.2%
26 GSK 2.60% 88.0%
27 HLN 2.59% 87.7%
28 LLOY 2.58% 87.3%
29 TSCO 2.58% 87.3%
30 VOD 2.47% 83.6%
31 TATE 2.33% 78.8%
32 ULVR 2.18% 73.7%
33 BT.A 2.09% 70.6%
34 SGRO 1.97% 66.6%
35 RKT 1.68% 57.1%

Mean 2.86%

The close packing of values is evident, in that 20% of the median spans positions 4 to 25. Soon the lightest weight holdings will be eligible for topping up.

TJH

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#580505

Postby tjh290633 » April 3rd, 2023, 8:23 pm

Once again time to reinvest accumulated dividends, Admiral (ADM) being the most eligible holding and was topped up by 20% at 2046.5p. My top up table looks like this tonight:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD* 1 BHP 6.15% 1 VOD 4.69%
2 WDS+ 2 WDS 5.13% 2 IGG 4.63%
3 BATS+ 3 TW. 5.03% 3 PHP 4.53%
4 PHP* 4 ADM 4.77% 4 LLOY 4.42%
5 BT.A* 5 S32 4.63% 5 BLND 4.37%
6 RIO 6 LGEN 4.53% 6 BT.A 4.34%
7 LLOY* 7 AV. 4.38% 7 AV. 4.04%
8 IGG* 8 BATS 4.28% 8 TW. 4.04%
9 SGRO 9 IMB 4.24% 9 LGEN 3.83%
10 ULVR 10 VOD 4.09% 10 WDS 3.60%
11 AV.+ 11 RIO 3.79% 11 GSK 3.42%
12 BLND* 12 IGG 3.29% 12 IMB 3.39%
13 S32+ 13 BLND 3.17% 13 BP. 3.38%
14 RKT 14 PHP 3.06% 14 TSCO 3.34%
15 LGEN+ 15 NG. 3.04% 15 BATS 3.32%
16 IMB+ 16 SSE 3.03% 16 KGF 3.22%
17 SMDS 17 SMDS 2.81% 17 PSON 3.03%
18 BHP+ 18 KGF 2.69% 18 SHEL 3.02%
19 GSK 19 BP. 2.64% 19 SSE 2.97%
20 TATE 20 BT.A 2.43% 20 HLN 2.77%

As always I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20% would exceed 5% of either share of income(+) or share of cost (*). That efectively imposes a cut-off point of 4.2% of either parameter. ADM has now moved onto the naughty step and RIO is the current most eligible share. Probably mid-May before the next top-up.

My postfolio now looks like this:

Value                
Rank EPIC Weight
1 BA. 3.81%
2 BP. 3.66%
3 BHP 3.58%
4 AZN 3.36%
5 NG. 3.36%
6 DGE 3.33%
7 TW. 3.29%
8 ADM 3.25%
9 IMI 3.23%
10 SSE 3.16%
11 S32 3.01%
12 LGEN 3.01%
13 IMB 2.99%
14 AV. 2.98%
15 SHEL 2.98%
16 KGF 2.94%
17 UU. 2.88%
18 SMDS 2.87%
19 TSCO 2.84%
20 BLND 2.78%
21 BATS 2.78%
22 WDS 2.78%
23 IGG 2.67%
24 GSK 2.63%
25 RIO 2.62%
26 HLN 2.60%
27 VOD 2.50%
28 PSON 2.50%
29 PHP 2.46%
30 BT.A 2.42%
31 LLOY 2.42%
32 TATE 2.38%
33 ULVR 2.28%
34 RKT 1.86%
35 SGRO 1.79%

ADM moved up from 22nd to 8th postion as a result. Weightings are very closely packed around the median. Just a couple of outliers.

TJH

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#585297

Postby tjh290633 » April 26th, 2023, 10:45 am

I had been waiting for dividends to accumulate sufficiently to top up RIO, but its price oblligingly fell yesterday to allow me to do the top-up this morning. Added 20% at 5062.4p. My top-up table now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 WDS* 1 BHP 6.05% 1 VOD 4.57%
2 VOD+ 2 WDS 6.04% 2 IGG 4.51%
3 S32* 3 TW. 4.95% 3 PHP 4.42%
4 PHP+ 4 ADM 4.69% 4 LLOY 4.31%
5 LLOY+ 5 S32 4.55% 5 BLND 4.26%
6 BT.A+ 6 RIO 4.48% 6 BT.A 4.23%
7 BATS* 7 LGEN 4.45% 7 AV. 3.94%
8 BLND+ 8 AV. 4.31% 8 TW. 3.94%
9 RIO* 9 BATS 4.21% 9 LGEN 3.73%
10 SGRO 10 IMB 4.17% 10 ADM 3.71%
11 BHP* 11 VOD 4.08% 11 WDS 3.51%
12 IGG+ 12 IGG 3.23% 12 GSK 3.34%
13 ULVR 13 BLND 3.12% 13 IMB 3.31%
14 RKT 14 PHP 3.00% 14 BP. 3.29%
15 LGEN* 15 NG. 2.99% 15 TSCO 3.26%
16 SMDS 16 SSE 2.98% 16 BATS 3.24%
17 AV.* 17 SMDS 2.77% 17 KGF 3.14%
18 IMB 18 KGF 2.64% 18 PSON 2.96%
19 GSK 19 BP. 2.59% 19 SHEL 2.95%
20 KGF 20 BT.A 2.39% 20 SSE 2.90%

As always I disqualify any share which would provide more than 5% on dividend income, if topped up by 20% (*) and likewiase if its share of portfolio cost would exceed 5% (+). Consequently RIO now becomes disqualified again. SGRO now ranks first for top-up and is my lowest weight share, so may get a bigger top-up.

My portfolio now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 BA. 3.86% 137.4%
2 AZN 3.56% 126.9%
3 BP. 3.54% 126.0%
4 ADM 3.48% 124.0%
5 NG. 3.45% 122.7%
6 DGE 3.39% 120.6%
7 TW. 3.29% 117.1%
8 IMI 3.21% 114.3%
9 BHP 3.20% 113.9%
10 SSE 3.18% 113.2%
11 IMB 3.03% 108.0%
12 AV. 3.01% 107.1%
13 LGEN 2.97% 105.6%
14 UU. 2.95% 105.0%
15 SHEL 2.92% 104.1%
16 TSCO 2.91% 103.6%
17 RIO 2.87% 102.4%
18 KGF 2.81% 100.0%
19 BATS 2.80% 99.6%
20 SMDS 2.76% 98.4%
21 IGG 2.76% 98.2%
22 HLN 2.74% 97.6%
23 S32 2.71% 96.6%
24 GSK 2.67% 95.0%
25 BLND 2.66% 94.7%
26 WDS 2.59% 92.1%
27 VOD 2.48% 88.5%
28 PSON 2.47% 88.0%
29 PHP 2.46% 87.5%
30 BT.A 2.46% 87.5%
31 TATE 2.42% 86.3%
32 LLOY 2.35% 83.8%
33 ULVR 2.31% 82.2%
34 RKT 1.89% 67.4%
35 SGRO 1.83% 65.0%

Mean 2.86%

RIO was in 27th position and has now moved just above the median to 17th position. Next top-up could be mid-May or early June.

TJH

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#590546

Postby tjh290633 » May 22nd, 2023, 11:21 am

For some reason receipt of the PID from PHP is later than the ordinary dividend, which means that I had to trim back my top-up of BATS this morning to 19% extra. I coukld have waited the estra day, but it hardly seemed worthwhile. Added at 2675p, taking BATS back into disqualification after a brief emergence. My top-up table now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD+ 1 BHP 5.97% 1 VOD 4.54%
2 WDS* 2 WDS 5.96% 2 IGG 4.48%
3 S32* 3 BATS 4.95% 3 PHP 4.39%
4 BLND+ 4 TW. 4.89% 4 LLOY 4.28%
5 BT.A+ 5 ADM 4.63% 5 BLND 4.24%
6 LLOY+ 6 S32 4.49% 6 BT.A 4.20%
7 PHP+ 7 RIO 4.42% 7 AV. 3.92%
8 IGG+ 8 LGEN 4.40% 8 TW. 3.91%
9 IMB 9 AV. 4.25% 9 BATS 3.87%
10 RIO* 10 IMB 4.14% 10 LGEN 3.71%
11 SGRO 11 VOD 4.12% 11 ADM 3.69%
12 KGF 12 IGG 3.19% 12 WDS 3.49%
13 LGEN* 13 NG. 3.17% 13 GSK 3.32%
14 ULVR 14 BLND 3.01% 14 IMB 3.29%
15 BATS* 15 PHP 2.97% 15 BP. 3.27%
16 RKT 16 SSE 2.94% 16 TSCO 3.24%
17 BHP* 17 SMDS 2.73% 17 KGF 3.12%
18 AV.* 18 BP. 2.68% 18 PSON 2.94%
19 GSK 19 KGF 2.61% 19 SHEL 2.93%
20 SMDS 20 BT.A 2.36% 20 SSE 2.88%

As always, I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20%, would exceed my limit of 5% of either share of income (*) or share of portfolio cost (+). I have no shares not paying dividends. As you can see, BATS is just short of the limit and the first 9 ranked by share of income are disqualified. This means that IMB are currently next in line for topping up, but things can change as results are announced.

My portfolio now looks like this, ranked by weight:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 BA. 3.77% 132.1%
2 AZN 3.57% 124.8%
3 ADM 3.55% 124.3%
4 IMI 3.50% 122.6%
5 TW. 3.45% 120.7%
6 NG. 3.38% 118.2%
7 BHP 3.33% 116.6%
8 SSE 3.30% 115.4%
9 BP. 3.30% 115.4%
10 DGE 3.26% 114.0%
11 BATS 3.07% 107.5%
12 AV. 3.04% 106.3%
13 SHEL 2.97% 104.1%
14 LGEN 2.96% 103.6%
15 UU. 2.88% 100.8%
16 RIO 2.88% 100.7%
17 SMDS 2.87% 100.4%
18 TSCO 2.86% 100.0%
19 IMB 2.79% 97.7%
20 S32 2.77% 97.0%
21 HLN 2.73% 95.5%
22 WDS 2.72% 95.1%
23 KGF 2.71% 94.8%
24 IGG 2.70% 94.6%
25 GSK 2.59% 90.8%
26 PHP 2.56% 89.6%
27 BLND 2.53% 88.6%
28 PSON 2.47% 86.4%
29 TATE 2.38% 83.4%
30 BT.A 2.38% 83.2%
31 LLOY 2.34% 81.8%
32 VOD 2.32% 81.1%
33 ULVR 2.29% 80.1%
34 RKT 1.94% 67.9%
35 SGRO 1.88% 65.8%

Mean 2.86%


BATS has moved up from 25th to 11th position.

TJH

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598024

Postby tjh290633 » June 26th, 2023, 10:20 am

As indicated in viewtopic.php?p=597722#p597722 I have now topped up my holding of DS Smith (SMDS) by 20% at 265.5p. My top-up table now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD+ 1 BHP 5.90% 1 VOD 4.52%
2 S32* 2 WDS 5.89% 2 IGG 4.46%
3 BLND+ 3 BATS 4.89% 3 PHP 4.37%
4 WDS* 4 TW. 4.83% 4 LLOY 4.26%
5 BT.A 5 ADM 4.58% 5 BLND 4.21%
6 PHP+ 6 S32 4.44% 6 BT.A 4.18%
7 LLOY+ 7 RIO 4.37% 7 AV. 3.89%
8 TW.* 8 LGEN 4.34% 8 TW. 3.89%
9 SGRO 9 AV. 4.20% 9 BATS 3.84%
10 IGG+ 10 IMB 4.08% 10 LGEN 3.68%
11 LGEN* 11 VOD 4.07% 11 ADM 3.66%
12 IMB* 12 SMDS 3.60% 12 WDS 3.46%
13 KGF 13 IGG 3.15% 13 GSK 3.30%
14 RKT 14 SSE 3.15% 14 IMB 3.26%
15 AV. 15 NG. 3.13% 15 BP. 3.25%
16 BATS* 16 BLND 2.97% 16 TSCO 3.22%
17 RIO* 17 PHP 2.93% 17 KGF 3.10%
18 BHP* 18 BP. 2.65% 18 PSON 2.92%
19 ULVR 19 KGF 2.58% 19 SHEL 2.91%
20 GSK 20 BT.A 2.33% 20 SSE 2.86%

As is my custom, I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20%, would provide more than 5% of portfolio incomr (*) or would have cost more than 5% of total portfolio cost (+). This latest trade has released BT.A from its shackles on portfolio cost and that is now leading the ranks of eligible shares. Aviva (AV.) has also been freed on grounds of share of income, but is way down the list. It looks like early August for the next top-up, and things can change in that time.

My portfolio now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 BA. 3.82% 129.9%
2 AZN 3.60% 122.7%
3 IMI 3.60% 122.7%
4 ADM 3.55% 120.9%
5 BHP 3.50% 119.2%
6 SSE 3.42% 116.6%
7 NG. 3.38% 115.0%
8 BP. 3.31% 112.7%
9 DGE 3.22% 109.8%
10 BATS 3.20% 109.0%
11 RIO 3.07% 104.6%
12 SMDS 3.06% 104.1%
13 SHEL 3.04% 103.6%
14 AV. 3.01% 102.7%
15 LGEN 2.98% 101.5%
16 TW. 2.98% 101.4%
17 IMB 2.94% 100.1%
18 UU. 2.94% 100.0%
19 TSCO 2.83% 96.4%
20 HLN 2.79% 94.9%
21 WDS 2.78% 94.6%
22 GSK 2.76% 93.9%
23 IGG 2.75% 93.7%
24 KGF 2.69% 91.7%
25 S32 2.64% 89.8%
26 PSON 2.60% 88.4%
27 PHP 2.36% 80.2%
28 TATE 2.33% 79.4%
29 ULVR 2.33% 79.3%
30 LLOY 2.25% 76.6%
31 BLND 2.25% 76.5%
32 BT.A 2.22% 75.6%
33 VOD 2.15% 73.3%
34 RKT 1.93% 65.7%
35 SGRO 1.74% 59.2%

Mean 2.86%

SMDS has moved up from 26th to 12th position when ranked by weight.

TJH

tmiuatga
Posts: 3
Joined: January 6th, 2020, 1:09 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598744

Postby tmiuatga » June 29th, 2023, 12:40 am

Happy birthday TJH and thanks for your wisdom and knowledge down through the years.

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598809

Postby tjh290633 » June 29th, 2023, 11:53 am

Thank you for the kind thoughts.

TJH

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7895
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598821

Postby mc2fool » June 29th, 2023, 12:42 pm

tjh290633 wrote:Thank you for the kind thoughts.

TJH

Now I am sure I remember you saying (possibly on TMF) that the numbers in your username were not your birthday ... or has my memory failed me? :?

monabri
Lemon Half
Posts: 8427
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
Has thanked: 1549 times
Been thanked: 3445 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598827

Postby monabri » June 29th, 2023, 1:07 pm

mc2fool wrote:
tjh290633 wrote:Thank you for the kind thoughts.

TJH

Now I am sure I remember you saying (possibly on TMF) that the numbers in your username were not your birthday ... or has my memory failed me? :?


no...

viewtopic.php?p=403999#p403999

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598849

Postby tjh290633 » June 29th, 2023, 3:01 pm

mc2fool wrote:
tjh290633 wrote:Thank you for the kind thoughts.

TJH

Now I am sure I remember you saying (possibly on TMF) that the numbers in your username were not your birthday ... or has my memory failed me? :?

They are not the date on my birth certificate. That, however, is not the date on which I was born. The numbers are the correct date.

TJH

Salimandre
Posts: 15
Joined: November 13th, 2016, 6:24 pm
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#598856

Postby Salimandre » June 29th, 2023, 3:15 pm

In which case, Happy Birthday! and many thanks for all your work sharing your thoughts on TLD (and TMF before)
hope you have a lovely day
xx

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#619778

Postby tjh290633 » October 9th, 2023, 7:53 pm

I had been sitting on accumulated dividends for too long, so topped up BT.A, SGRO and ULVR by 20% each today. BT.A at 114.8p, SGRO at 711.4p and ULVR at 3,919.5p. They were the top eligible shares in my top-up table, which now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD*+ 1 WDS 5.39% 1 BT.A 4.63%
2 BLND 2 TW. 5.26% 2 VOD 4.47%
3 PHP+ 3 BATS 5.24% 3 IGG 4.41%
4 BT.A+ 4 LGEN 4.72% 4 PHP 4.33%
5 LLOY+ 5 AV. 4.62% 5 LLOY 4.22%
6 IGG+ 6 IMB 4.38% 6 BLND 4.17%
7 IMB* 7 VOD 4.31% 7 AV. 3.86%
8 LGEN* 8 BHP 3.87% 8 TW. 3.85%
9 WDS* 9 SMDS 3.86% 9 BATS 3.81%
10 BATS* 10 RIO 3.71% 10 LGEN 3.65%
11 SGRO 11 IGG 3.43% 11 ADM 3.63%
12 KGF 12 SSE 3.37% 12 WDS 3.43%
13 RKT 13 NG. 3.35% 13 GSK 3.27%
14 SSE 14 ADM 3.22% 14 IMB 3.23%
15 UU. 15 PHP 3.21% 15 BP. 3.22%
16 TATE 16 BLND 3.18% 16 TSCO 3.19%
17 AV.* 17 BT.A 2.99% 17 KGF 3.07%
18 S32 18 BP. 2.91% 18 PSON 2.89%
19 RIO 19 KGF 2.76% 19 SHEL 2.89%
20 TW.* 20 LLOY 2.49% 20 SSE 2.83%

As always, I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20% would exceed my arbitrary limits of 5% of either share of income(*) or share of portfolio cost(+). The changes have released BLND from the cost barrier BT.A has gone back behind it.

My portfolio now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 BA. 4.11% 144.1%
2 ADM 3.93% 137.6%
3 BP. 3.74% 130.8%
4 SHEL 3.43% 120.1%
5 BHP 3.39% 118.9%
6 AZN 3.38% 118.4%
7 TW. 3.32% 116.2%
8 IMI 3.31% 116.0%
9 SMDS 3.14% 109.9%
10 AV. 3.09% 108.3%
11 TSCO 3.08% 107.9%
12 NG. 3.04% 106.6%
13 BATS 3.02% 105.6%
14 RIO 3.01% 105.6%
15 DGE 2.94% 102.9%
16 GSK 2.88% 100.9%
17 WDS 2.87% 100.5%
18 HLN 2.86% 100.0%
19 LGEN 2.83% 99.0%
20 SSE 2.83% 99.0%
21 IMB 2.79% 97.6%
22 PSON 2.76% 96.7%
23 UU. 2.72% 95.3%
24 ULVR 2.63% 92.3%
25 IGG 2.55% 89.3%
26 KGF 2.54% 88.9%
27 BT.A 2.38% 83.2%
28 S32 2.36% 82.7%
29 PHP 2.32% 81.3%
30 BLND 2.31% 81.0%
31 VOD 2.22% 77.9%
32 LLOY 2.21% 77.3%
33 TATE 2.13% 74.4%
34 SGRO 2.08% 72.9%
35 RKT 1.81% 63.3%

Mean 2.86%

BT.A has moved up from 33rd to 27th position, SGRO up one place from last and ULVR up from 30th to 24th position. Notable that BA. is only 6% of my threshold for top slicing at 1.5 times the median holding weight. The latest potential candidates for topping up lie well down in the rankings.

TJH

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#622684

Postby tjh290633 » October 24th, 2023, 10:28 am

Unexpectedly BAE Systems has been moving up as the market fell, and last night went past my self imposed weight limit of 150% of the median holding value. Accordingly I top sliced my holding by 25% at £10.706 this morning. This left a fair bit of cash, with accumulated dividends, which was used to top up the 3 most eligible shares, namely British Land (BLND), Kingfisher (KGF) and Segro (SGRO) by 25% each. I almost had enough money to top up Reckitt Benckiser, but need another postal order to do so. My top-up ranking table now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD*+ 1 WDS 5.34% 1 BLND 4.67%
2 PHP+ 2 TW. 5.21% 2 BT.A 4.57%
3 BT.A+ 3 BATS 5.19% 3 VOD 4.42%
4 LGEN* 4 LGEN 4.68% 4 IGG 4.36%
5 BLND+ 5 AV. 4.57% 5 PHP 4.27%
6 IGG+ 6 IMB 4.33% 6 LLOY 4.16%
7 WDS* 7 VOD 4.27% 7 AV. 3.81%
8 IMB* 8 BHP 3.84% 8 TW. 3.80%
9 LLOY+ 9 SMDS 3.82% 9 BATS 3.76%
10 BATS* 10 BLND 3.78% 10 KGF 3.61%
11 TW.* 11 RIO 3.68% 11 LGEN 3.60%
12 RKT 12 IGG 3.40% 12 ADM 3.58%
13 S32 13 SSE 3.34% 13 WDS 3.39%
14 TATE 14 NG. 3.32% 14 GSK 3.23%
15 KGF 15 KGF 3.28% 15 IMB 3.19%
16 SGRO 16 ADM 3.19% 16 BP. 3.18%
17 AV.* 17 PHP 3.18% 17 TSCO 3.15%
18 SSE 18 BT.A 2.97% 18 PSON 2.86%
19 SMDS 19 BP. 2.89% 19 SHEL 2.85%
20 RIO 20 LLOY 2.47% 20 SSE 2.80%

As alwyas I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20% would exceed 5% of either share of dividend income(*) or of portfolio cost(+). Consequently the top 11 in my table are disqualified as indicated. This put RKT in pole position for topping up, but things can change.

My portfolio now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 ADM 4.06% 142.1%
2 BP. 3.85% 134.6%
3 SHEL 3.56% 124.6%
4 BHP 3.37% 117.8%
5 IMI 3.25% 113.7%
6 BA. 3.25% 113.6%
7 AZN 3.17% 110.8%
8 NG. 3.10% 108.2%
9 AV. 3.08% 107.6%
10 TSCO 3.08% 107.6%
11 TW. 3.07% 107.4%
12 SMDS 3.04% 106.3%
13 RIO 3.01% 105.1%
14 DGE 2.99% 104.6%
15 BATS 2.97% 103.8%
16 UU. 2.96% 103.4%
17 SSE 2.92% 102.1%
18 KGF 2.86% 100.0%
19 WDS 2.86% 100.0%
20 HLN 2.85% 99.5%
21 PSON 2.83% 99.1%
22 IMB 2.83% 98.9%
23 GSK 2.81% 98.4%
24 LGEN 2.77% 96.7%
25 ULVR 2.71% 94.7%
26 BLND 2.68% 93.8%
27 IGG 2.52% 88.2%
28 SGRO 2.45% 85.8%
29 S32 2.31% 80.7%
30 BT.A 2.30% 80.4%
31 VOD 2.20% 77.0%
32 PHP 2.19% 76.6%
33 LLOY 2.19% 76.5%
34 TATE 2.00% 69.9%
35 RKT 1.88% 65.7%

Mean 2.86%

BA. has fallen to 6th place, BLND has risen from 29th to 26th place, KGF from 27th to 18th and SGRO from 33rd to 28th. The yields on all the new shares are higher than that on BA., so the move should be income enhancing. The portfolio yield is now 5,4% on an historical basis. Admiral is quite high and could be the next to be trimmed back.

TJH

kempiejon
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3580
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 10:30 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1195 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#622733

Postby kempiejon » October 24th, 2023, 12:58 pm

tjh290633 wrote:Unexpectedly BAE Systems has been moving up as the market fell,


All that war etc makes that move up pretty expected to me. My BAe is also pregnant with gains but i know what you mean against the wider falling tide. Not been high yielding for a while, unfortunately on the profit front, bought by me when my average size was a fair bit smaller and never topped up because the yield never came into range again for my HYP. They've churned out an increasing income for the past 15 years I've held, which is nice.
Early on in my investing I quoted the maxim Booze, Baccy and Bombs. There's cash in killing.

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#628947

Postby tjh290633 » November 21st, 2023, 10:02 am

Accumulated dividends have allowed me to top up LLOY by 20% this morning at 42.6p. As a result, my top-up table now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD+ 1 WDS 5.34% 1 LLOY 4.80%
2 WDS* 2 TW. 5.22% 2 BLND 4.63%
3 PHP+ 3 BATS 5.19% 3 BT.A 4.54%
4 BT.A+ 4 LGEN 4.68% 4 VOD 4.39%
5 BATS* 5 AV. 4.58% 5 IGG 4.33%
6 IGG+ 6 IMB 4.46% 6 PHP 4.24%
7 IMB* 7 VOD 4.26% 7 AV. 3.78%
8 LGEN* 8 BLND 3.88% 8 TW. 3.78%
9 LLOY+ 9 BHP 3.84% 9 BATS 3.73%
10 ULVR 10 SMDS 3.82% 10 KGF 3.59%
11 S32 11 RIO 3.68% 11 LGEN 3.58%
12 RKT 12 NG. 3.42% 12 ADM 3.56%
13 AV.* 13 IGG 3.40% 13 WDS 3.37%
14 TATE 14 KGF 3.28% 14 GSK 3.21%
15 GSK 15 ADM 3.19% 15 IMB 3.17%
16 SMDS 16 PHP 3.18% 16 BP. 3.16%
17 BLND+ 17 BP. 3.03% 17 TSCO 3.13%
18 UU. 18 BT.A 2.97% 18 PSON 2.84%
19 TSCO 19 LLOY 2.96% 19 SHEL 2.83%
20 TW.* 20 UU. 2.54% 20 SSE 2.78%

This has now returned LLOY to the list of disqualified shares, because of share of portfolio cost(+). As always I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20% would exceed 5% of either share of income(*) or share of portfolio cost. Hence the top 9 in my top-up list are disqualified. LLOY has moved up from 32nd in the rank by value to 27th place. Hence Unilever is next in line for a top-up as things stand. The portfolio ranked by value now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 ADM 4.16% 141.9%
2 TW. 3.53% 120.3%
3 BHP 3.50% 119.3%
4 IMI 3.32% 113.1%
5 BP. 3.31% 112.7%
6 SHEL 3.28% 111.8%
7 RIO 3.22% 109.9%
8 SSE 3.17% 108.2%
9 BLND 3.16% 107.9%
10 KGF 3.15% 107.4%
11 NG. 3.14% 107.0%
12 AV. 3.13% 106.7%
13 SMDS 3.10% 105.8%
14 BA. 3.06% 104.4%
15 AZN 3.01% 102.8%
16 UU. 2.99% 102.1%
17 TSCO 2.96% 100.8%
18 LGEN 2.93% 100.0%
19 BATS 2.91% 99.3%
20 IMB 2.90% 98.8%
21 PSON 2.85% 97.4%
22 SGRO 2.80% 95.3%
23 HLN 2.62% 89.5%
24 IGG 2.60% 88.7%
25 DGE 2.59% 88.2%
26 GSK 2.58% 87.9%
27 LLOY 2.57% 87.6%
28 WDS 2.49% 84.8%
29 ULVR 2.44% 83.2%
30 PHP 2.42% 82.6%
31 BT.A 2.36% 80.3%
32 S32 2.17% 73.9%
33 VOD 2.09% 71.4%
34 TATE 1.90% 64.9%
35 RKT 1.60% 54.5%

Mean 2.86%

My next top-up may be in January.

TJH

csearle
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4838
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 4860 times
Been thanked: 2123 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#629053

Postby csearle » November 21st, 2023, 6:55 pm

Nice. The icing on the cake would be for jimsusan to comment.

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#638933

Postby tjh290633 » January 8th, 2024, 9:55 am

Having sufficient accumulated dividends, I have topped up South32 (S32) by 20% this morning at 172p. S32 was the first eligible share in my top-up table, which now looks like this:

Top-up          Income                     Cost                
Rank EPIC Rank EPIC % Income Rank Epic % Cost
1 VOD+* 1 WDS 5.29% 1 LLOY 4.77%
2 WDS* 2 TW. 5.17% 2 BLND 4.61%
3 BT.A+ 3 BATS 5.14% 3 BT.A 4.52%
4 BATS* 4 LGEN 4.63% 4 VOD 4.37%
5 PHP+ 5 AV. 4.53% 5 IGG 4.31%
6 IMB* 6 IMB 4.41% 6 PHP 4.22%
7 IGG+ 7 VOD 4.22% 7 AV. 3.76%
8 LGEN* 8 BLND 3.84% 8 TW. 3.76%
9 ULVR 9 BHP 3.80% 9 BATS 3.71%
10 RKT 10 SMDS 3.78% 10 KGF 3.57%
11 AV.* 11 RIO 3.64% 11 LGEN 3.56%
12 LLOY+ 12 NG. 3.39% 12 ADM 3.54%
13 S32 13 IGG 3.37% 13 WDS 3.35%
14 TATE 14 KGF 3.25% 14 GSK 3.19%
15 KGF 15 PHP 3.17% 15 IMB 3.16%
16 GSK 16 ADM 3.16% 16 BP. 3.14%
17 UU. 17 BP. 2.97% 17 TSCO 3.11%
18 SMDS 18 BT.A 2.94% 18 S32 2.95%
19 DGE 19 LLOY 2.93% 19 PSON 2.82%
20 TW.* 20 UU. 2.52% 20 SHEL 2.81%

As always I disqualify any share which, if topped up by 20%, would exceed 5% of either dividend income (*) or portfolio cost (+). Consequently the next 2 eligible shares are ULVR and RKT as things stand. Early February is the most likely time.

My portfolio now looks like this:

Value                           
Rank EPIC Weight % Median
1 ADM 4.11% 145.1%
2 TW. 3.89% 137.3%
3 BHP 3.56% 125.7%
4 BLND 3.27% 115.3%
5 RIO 3.21% 113.3%
6 BA. 3.21% 113.2%
7 NG. 3.19% 112.5%
8 SSE 3.18% 112.0%
9 IMI 3.17% 112.0%
10 SMDS 3.15% 111.0%
11 BP. 3.14% 110.9%
12 TSCO 3.12% 110.1%
13 AZN 3.09% 109.2%
14 AV. 3.08% 108.8%
15 SHEL 3.08% 108.5%
16 KGF 3.00% 105.8%
17 LGEN 2.97% 104.8%
18 UU. 2.83% 100.0%
19 SGRO 2.81% 99.2%
20 PSON 2.81% 99.1%
21 IMB 2.80% 98.9%
22 IGG 2.80% 98.7%
23 LLOY 2.75% 96.9%
24 GSK 2.72% 95.9%
25 BATS 2.62% 92.6%
26 HLN 2.57% 90.7%
27 S32 2.55% 90.0%
28 DGE 2.46% 86.8%
29 PHP 2.39% 84.4%
30 ULVR 2.38% 84.1%
31 WDS 2.38% 83.9%
32 BT.A 2.31% 81.6%
33 VOD 1.90% 67.1%
34 TATE 1.88% 66.4%
35 RKT 1.59% 56.2%

Mean 2.86%

S32 has moved up from 32nd to 27th position. It should be noted that I trimmed back S32 in February 2022, when it was overweight at 248p. My IRR for the holding is 10.18%.

TJH

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10439
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3644 times
Been thanked: 5272 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#639319

Postby Arborbridge » January 10th, 2024, 7:21 am

I wonder if you might veto RKT on the grounds of low yield.
One of your objectives is to ratchet up income and maintain a high yield portfolio - is RKT a qualifier when it wouldn't get into a HYP list at present?


PS: I might justify it on the grounds that if one wants RKT, its yield is about "as good as it gets" at the moment.

Arb.

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8289
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4138 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#639331

Postby tjh290633 » January 10th, 2024, 9:06 am

Arborbridge wrote:I wonder if you might veto RKT on the grounds of low yield.
One of your objectives is to ratchet up income and maintain a high yield portfolio - is RKT a qualifier when it wouldn't get into a HYP list at present?


PS: I might justify it on the grounds that if one wants RKT, its yield is about "as good as it gets" at the moment.

Arb.

I look at it and wonder, Arb. I usually do what the table tells me. The yield on RKT is not low enough to contemplate selling it, which is a possibility with IMI and HLN. I must have a look at my records to see how it stacks up.

Computer now fired up. First bought in 2011 at 3062p with a yield of 4.08%, Indivior demerged in 2014 and trimmed when overweight in 2016 at 7058p. Dividends increased every year since bought, except in 2020 and 2021. IRR 10.25%, so no regrets on that score.

Looking at my top-up table, today it runs RKT, ULVR, TATE, S32, KGF, SMDS. TATE has the lowest yield at 3.0%, and the first above my median yield of 4.9% is KGF at 5.5%. SMDS has a yield of 6.05%.

It always puzzles me when a share that has been trimmed for being overweight sinks to the bottom of the table. This is down to the considerable fall in share price and maybe this is the right time to buy. Who knows?

TJH

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10439
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3644 times
Been thanked: 5272 times

Re: TJH Portfolio adjustment

#639333

Postby Arborbridge » January 10th, 2024, 9:16 am

tjh290633 wrote:
It always puzzles me when a share that has been trimmed for being overweight sinks to the bottom of the table. This is down to the considerable fall in share price and maybe this is the right time to buy. Who knows?

TJH


Indeed - the 1st world dilemmas we face :)


Return to “HYP Practical (See Group Guidelines)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 41 guests