Geng, If it helps I am separating the two questions.
1. Q. Should it go in an ISA. A = Almost certainly yes. Is anyone suggesting anything else ?
2. Q. Should it be the same things. A = Strategic ignorance says yes, so as to avoid the buy high / sell low trap. However there may be cases where the company so utterly broken that selling the losses is the better of two evils. It really is for the individual investor to make that call. I am making the point that Mr Market has more than one way to mend a broken company and so sometimes holding ones losses is actually quite sensible. But each case is its own judgement call.
regards, good luck all, dspp
Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site
Bed & ISA - a time to swap the dogs?
Forum rules
Tight HYP discussions only please - OT please discuss in strategies
Tight HYP discussions only please - OT please discuss in strategies
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5884
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
- Has thanked: 5825 times
- Been thanked: 2127 times
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:17 am
- Been thanked: 2628 times
Re: Bed & ISA - a time to swap the dogs?
dspp wrote:1. Q. Should it go in an ISA. A = Almost certainly yes. Is anyone suggesting anything else ?
Yes, though probably without realising that was what they were suggesting!
Specifically, you were suggesting that by suggesting there was no need to sell, when selling is an essential part of moving it into an ISA.
Gengulphus
Return to “HYP Practical (See Group Guidelines)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 29 guests