Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

The future for oil

Lanark
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1334
Joined: March 27th, 2017, 11:41 am
Has thanked: 598 times
Been thanked: 585 times

Re: The future for oil

#280059

Postby Lanark » January 26th, 2020, 12:33 pm

Everything I have read indicates that we will boil the planet through global warming long before we run out of energy sources.

The problem is not that we will run out of oil but that we might not run out in time.

Scarcity and rising prices will ensure that rich people never run out of oil.

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: The future for oil

#280441

Postby dspp » January 27th, 2020, 10:03 pm

monabri wrote:World energy consumption

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_e ... onsumption

Try doing without fossile fuels. The real alternative at the moments is limiting population growth which would cause the first world problems - who will look after the ageing population and - as more retire - who will they tax?


Apart from petrochemical feedstock (which are not that significant) a switch is perfectly feasible. Lithium has delivered the missing link, i.e. sufficient storage that, combined with effective grids of an appropriate scale (which can be very small, e.g. microgrid in some places), a global energy transition is perfectly reasonable. Indeed it is underway. Here is what it looks like in one scenario I would call 'fast' where the renewables rollout continues until it hits the industrial capacity constraint that I assume exists, which I set equal to that of the existing fossil etc annual build rate. We know that build rate is possible, because we do it every year now.

Note these graphs are of world primary energy, not just electricity. So maybe 40% of that goes into heating/cooling, 30% to liquid transport fuels, and 30% to electricity (exact numbers are readily available if you look online).

Image

This means that a full transfer can be done in the next 25-years. Actually a full transfer can be done faster, but this was one where I put in some reasonable constraints. Then ask yourself what the price of shares in an oilfield company would be like in 2030 in such a scenario. Then check the reserves/production ratios for the main world oil companies. Then think about the price risk an investor is running in 2020.

In some respects this is more like a mid-case scenario. When one adds in aspects of the electric vehicle (i.e. true BEV) that is underway it could quite reasonably go faster. Equally there are many powerful political/strategic forces seeking to slow it down.

regards, dspp

(notes:
Data from: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2018, p9, Primary Energy by Fuel
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/ ... nergy.html
Oilfield decline rates, typically 4-8&, avge 6.5%
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/ ... .2012.0448
Typical power plant lifetime 20-40 years
https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/file ... 043133.pdf
renewables rollout peaks at about 6.2% in this case, i.e. less than typical oilfield decline rates, i.e. within that which global industrial capacity can deliver)

flyer61
Lemon Slice
Posts: 578
Joined: November 11th, 2016, 12:53 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 216 times

Re: The future for oil

#280538

Postby flyer61 » January 28th, 2020, 10:37 am

RVF - curious to understand why you think Shell will win out versus BP.

Greta thread BTW!

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2192
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 886 times
Been thanked: 1020 times

Re: The future for oil

#280542

Postby Howard » January 28th, 2020, 10:47 am

flyer61 wrote:RVF - curious to understand why you think Shell will win out versus BP.

Greta thread BTW!


And a Great typo too. Very appropriate to the discussion ;)

Howard

johnhemming
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3858
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: The future for oil

#281547

Postby johnhemming » February 1st, 2020, 8:16 am

This is an interesting and what seems mathematically well reasoned piece which argues that the IEA etc are forecasting 1.1m bb/d too high for 2020.
(or at least the end of the year).
https://seekingalpha.com/article/432019 ... oil-prices

This gives the source of the frac spread count
https://twitter.com/primaryvision

Which to be fair has popped up a bit in the last few weeks so that would imply less of a delta on the IEA predictions.

Proselenes
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1372
Joined: November 15th, 2016, 6:04 am
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 389 times

Re: The future for oil

#281586

Postby Proselenes » February 1st, 2020, 1:09 pm

Worth a listen

http://blog.gorozen.com/blog/adam-rozencwajg-featured-on-financial-sense-podcast-january-2020

.

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: The future for oil

#281702

Postby dspp » February 2nd, 2020, 10:43 am

johnhemming wrote:This is an interesting and what seems mathematically well reasoned piece which argues that the IEA etc are forecasting 1.1m bb/d too high for 2020.
(or at least the end of the year).
https://seekingalpha.com/article/432019 ... oil-prices

This gives the source of the frac spread count
https://twitter.com/primaryvision

Which to be fair has popped up a bit in the last few weeks so that would imply less of a delta on the IEA predictions.


John,

That excellent SA article (https://seekingalpha.com/article/432019 ... oil-prices?) looks about right, and is in line with what Art Berman has been saying ever since fraccing started up, based on fraccing fundamentals. Unfortunately Art seems to have gone dark as he is now monetising his blog ($$$ https://www.artberman.com/ ). My thinking is along these lines which is why I am still overweight oil & gas, expecting that the peak oil production problems will push price high, rather than peak oil consumption forcing price down. When to get off is the conundrum.

regards,
dspp

johnhemming
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3858
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: The future for oil

#281710

Postby johnhemming » February 2nd, 2020, 11:18 am

Its a difficult one to call, but I think I probably agree with you. I don't think that the global political system will actually deliver much control on the oxidation of extracted hydrocarbons. The electorate are likely to vote for BAU.

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: The future for oil

#345454

Postby dspp » October 5th, 2020, 7:48 pm

/sigh

Exxon’s Plan for Surging Carbon Emissions Revealed in Leaked Documents
Internal projections from one of world’s largest oil producers show an increase in its enormous contribution to global warming


"Exxon Mobil Corp. has been planning to increase annual carbon-dioxide emissions by as much as the output of the entire nation of Greece, an analysis of internal documents reviewed by Bloomberg shows, setting one of the largest corporate emitters against international efforts to slow the pace of warming.......Exxon’s own assessment of its $210 billion investment strategy shows yearly emissions rising 17% by 2025, according to the internal documents. The largest U.S. oil producer has never made a commitment to lower oil and gas output "

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social

Exxon for engineering & project management & hard-nosedness, good. Exxon on other things, tone deaf.

- dspp

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: The future for oil

#346291

Postby dspp » October 8th, 2020, 7:35 pm

Helpful slidedeck courtesy JohnKempReuters

Oil outlook 2021
Searching for a new equilibrium
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/c ... 202021.pdf

- dspp

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: The future for oil

#346293

Postby dspp » October 8th, 2020, 7:47 pm

courtesy JohnKempReuters

CIA Briefing Paper on 1974 Oil Crisis (Secret)

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom ... 0023-7.pdf

To my eyes what is most interesting is how much remains censored. Energy still matters greatly as it goes to the heart of power.

regards, dspp

scrumpyjack
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4850
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 2702 times

Re: Why The Energy Transition Will Be Fantastic For Small Oil Companies

#358293

Postby scrumpyjack » November 20th, 2020, 8:39 am

ReallyVeryFoolish wrote:Interesting read -

Small, independent oil producers are seeing the potential for growth over the next decade as major energy companies look to invest in renewables. As big companies are being forced to introduce greener policies, independent producers could profit from this change.


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/W ... anies.html

RVF


I would have thought 'the last man standing' will be Saudi Arabia who can produce oil for next to nothing, has vast reserves, and virtually no other source of revenue. If oil is going to die out, their best option is to keep undercutting everyone else and pump out all they can, otherwise it will eventually be left in the ground.

PeterGray
Lemon Slice
Posts: 848
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:18 am
Has thanked: 787 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Re: Why The Energy Transition Will Be Fantastic For Small Oil Companies

#358320

Postby PeterGray » November 20th, 2020, 9:55 am

scrumpyjack wrote:
ReallyVeryFoolish wrote:Interesting read -

Small, independent oil producers are seeing the potential for growth over the next decade as major energy companies look to invest in renewables. As big companies are being forced to introduce greener policies, independent producers could profit from this change.


https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/W ... anies.html

RVF


I would have thought 'the last man standing' will be Saudi Arabia who can produce oil for next to nothing, has vast reserves, and virtually no other source of revenue. If oil is going to die out, their best option is to keep undercutting everyone else and pump out all they can, otherwise it will eventually be left in the ground.


I don't think that makes sense. On two grounds.

- Firstly, by limiting production now (in concert with others) they can gain as much, or more, income from selling less oil.
- Secondly, demand for oil won't stop. It will fall off, massively over time, but over the next couple of decades it won't be that fast, and even then oil will still be very valuable for uses other than energy, though in much smaller quantities.

I'd think their current approach is probably pretty sensible. Try and keep prices up while not giving away too much market. They may still end up with oil in the ground in many decades time, but will have got as much, probably more, revenue than opening taps now.


Return to “Oil & Gas & Energy (Sector & Companies)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests