Blind tasting of 2 good beers, side by side.
Posted: May 14th, 2019, 5:41 pm
Blind tasted two similar beers, side by side, trying to understand what aspects and which I prefer. Poured in another room and brought to me as anonymous/unidentifiable.
Left
L- Mid chestnut, head swiftly reduced to partial cap/ring and lacing, clear 3.5/5
S- Puddingy, rich deep roast fruits/cherries 4.25/5
T- Rich, deep roasted flavours, develop onwards, some alcohol tang 4.25/5
M- Rich again, filling, a slow sipping beer, lovely balance. 4/5
O- This is the slightly sweeter of the two, and has a pungency to it the one below hasn’t. I don’t seek ‘sweetness’ but the balance in this makes it work, it is lovely; a perfect winter-warmer. 4/5
[Straight average = 4/5]
Right
L- Fractionally darker, clear, 3mm of ultra-fine head retaining well 4/5
S- Rich also, but a bit roasty/toastier than the prev. 3.75/5
T- Fractionally more toasted, into perhaps an even deeper flavour than the above, deep roasted finish. Rich also, without alcohol tang. The taste here has notable pungency to it’s depth. 4/5
F- Feels a bit lighter, more toasty/less rich than the above, makes it more one to drink at normal speed vs ‘slow sipping’.4/5
O- The feel and richness is slightly less pronounced but the flavour is more prominent. Better for drinking outside of winter? 4/5
[Straight average = 3.95/5]
... ...
Identity:
Left = Greene King Heritage Vintage Fine Ale 6.5% [On offer £2 at Waitrose]
Right = Fuller’s 1845 6.3% Strong Ale [On multi-buy offer, £1.50 at Waitrose]
Conclusion:
I’m surprised! I’ve had a few cases of 1845 and find that one a real gem. The Greene King, I’ve had a few bottles this past week or two, so haven’t yet quite got the measure of it yet. It costs more, but I can buy it 100M away vs a mile away. Plus, retention of a head, to me, is more cosmetic, especially if the CO2 in the mouth is maintained. So if the Greene King’s head held better, it would have been another fraction further ahead. Time to hit the nearby branch and stock up on the GK-Heritage!
- I'd be interested to see others else blind-taste a stalwart vs a new rival, and see what they conclude I found the process, without lables/descriptions/cues etc very enlightening.
Left
L- Mid chestnut, head swiftly reduced to partial cap/ring and lacing, clear 3.5/5
S- Puddingy, rich deep roast fruits/cherries 4.25/5
T- Rich, deep roasted flavours, develop onwards, some alcohol tang 4.25/5
M- Rich again, filling, a slow sipping beer, lovely balance. 4/5
O- This is the slightly sweeter of the two, and has a pungency to it the one below hasn’t. I don’t seek ‘sweetness’ but the balance in this makes it work, it is lovely; a perfect winter-warmer. 4/5
[Straight average = 4/5]
Right
L- Fractionally darker, clear, 3mm of ultra-fine head retaining well 4/5
S- Rich also, but a bit roasty/toastier than the prev. 3.75/5
T- Fractionally more toasted, into perhaps an even deeper flavour than the above, deep roasted finish. Rich also, without alcohol tang. The taste here has notable pungency to it’s depth. 4/5
F- Feels a bit lighter, more toasty/less rich than the above, makes it more one to drink at normal speed vs ‘slow sipping’.4/5
O- The feel and richness is slightly less pronounced but the flavour is more prominent. Better for drinking outside of winter? 4/5
[Straight average = 3.95/5]
... ...
Identity:
Left = Greene King Heritage Vintage Fine Ale 6.5% [On offer £2 at Waitrose]
Right = Fuller’s 1845 6.3% Strong Ale [On multi-buy offer, £1.50 at Waitrose]
Conclusion:
I’m surprised! I’ve had a few cases of 1845 and find that one a real gem. The Greene King, I’ve had a few bottles this past week or two, so haven’t yet quite got the measure of it yet. It costs more, but I can buy it 100M away vs a mile away. Plus, retention of a head, to me, is more cosmetic, especially if the CO2 in the mouth is maintained. So if the Greene King’s head held better, it would have been another fraction further ahead. Time to hit the nearby branch and stock up on the GK-Heritage!
- I'd be interested to see others else blind-taste a stalwart vs a new rival, and see what they conclude I found the process, without lables/descriptions/cues etc very enlightening.