search.php?keywords=dividendLemon Fool wrote:Information
The following words in your search query were ignored because they are too common words: dividend.
You must specify at least one word to search for. Each word must consist of at least 3 characters and must not contain more than 9 characters excluding wildcards.
Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh, for Donating to support the site
Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4179
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
- Has thanked: 1001 times
- Been thanked: 1855 times
Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
For an investment site, surely the word 'dividend' is an important search term? Apparently not....
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4834
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
- Has thanked: 4859 times
- Been thanked: 2122 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
I expect the flippin' search engine is playing a numbers game. If one wanted to search for Marks and Spencer it would avoid all the posts with "and" in them. I imagine it is the same mechanism.Breelander wrote:...
Maybe some of the external search facilities for searching this site might be better in this regard?
Chris
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4179
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
- Has thanked: 1001 times
- Been thanked: 1855 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
csearle wrote:...it would avoid all the posts with "and" in them....
Actually you CAN search for 'and' - if you add a wildcard. Not exactly an intuitive solution though....
search.php?keywords=and*
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6099
- Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
- Has thanked: 443 times
- Been thanked: 2344 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
Breelander wrote:For an investment site, surely the word 'dividend' is an important search term? Apparently not....search.php?keywords=dividendLemon Fool wrote:Information
The following words in your search query were ignored because they are too common words: dividend.
You must specify at least one word to search for. Each word must consist of at least 3 characters and must not contain more than 9 characters excluding wildcards.
Isn't it the opposite problem? It's not ignoring "dividend" but the search brings up too many results to be useful - as it's too common?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4834
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
- Has thanked: 4859 times
- Been thanked: 2122 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
Maybe you should search for "growing dividend" C.Breelander wrote:For an investment site...
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4179
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
- Has thanked: 1001 times
- Been thanked: 1855 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
dealtn wrote:Isn't it the opposite problem? It's not ignoring "dividend" but the search brings up too many results to be useful - as it's too common?
On its own, maybe. But as a qualifier in a search it should reduce the number of results. I specifically wanted to search for "Barclays dividend" and instead got hundreds of results that just included "Barclays"
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:17 am
- Been thanked: 2628 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
Breelander wrote:dealtn wrote:Isn't it the opposite problem? It's not ignoring "dividend" but the search brings up too many results to be useful - as it's too common?
On its own, maybe. But as a qualifier in a search it should reduce the number of results. I specifically wanted to search for "Barclays dividend" and instead got hundreds of results that just included "Barclays"
Well, following up on your own earlier comment, searching for "Barclays dividend*" seems to reduce them very effectively! Indeed, perhaps too effectively... :-(
Gengulphus
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
- Has thanked: 1666 times
- Been thanked: 3840 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
dealtn wrote:Breelander wrote:For an investment site, surely the word 'dividend' is an important search term? Apparently not....search.php?keywords=dividendLemon Fool wrote:Information
The following words in your search query were ignored because they are too common words: dividend.
You must specify at least one word to search for. Each word must consist of at least 3 characters and must not contain more than 9 characters excluding wildcards.
Isn't it the opposite problem? It's not ignoring "dividend" but the search brings up too many results to be useful - as it's too common?
How can "too many results" not be useful? Certainly gonna be more useful than none whatsoever.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6099
- Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
- Has thanked: 443 times
- Been thanked: 2344 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
Mike4 wrote:dealtn wrote:Breelander wrote:For an investment site, surely the word 'dividend' is an important search term? Apparently not....
search.php?keywords=dividend
Isn't it the opposite problem? It's not ignoring "dividend" but the search brings up too many results to be useful - as it's too common?
How can "too many results" not be useful? Certainly gonna be more useful than none whatsoever.
If the programme has a threshold output from an enquiry such that if number of results > x then error (or print "the following words in your search query were ignored because they are too common ... "), for instance.
Or do you think that is a more optimal outcome, and more useful, than "none whatsoever"? It looks the same to me.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
- Has thanked: 4140 times
- Been thanked: 10032 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
Breelander wrote:dealtn wrote:
Isn't it the opposite problem? It's not ignoring "dividend" but the search brings up too many results to be useful - as it's too common?
On its own, maybe. But as a qualifier in a search it should reduce the number of results.
I specifically wanted to search for "Barclays dividend" and instead got hundreds of results that just included "Barclays"
This is one of those situations where Google search is likely to give highly improved results over the limited internal search facilities here.
Google search can be asked to only look on specific sites, so we're able to force it to look at lemonfool.co.uk, and then we can add words to search for with a '+' between the words, which means that returned Lemon Fool pages will contain both 'Barclays' and 'dividend' if required.
In addition to that, we can then ask Google search to limit returned pages based on timescales, so on the example below, we're using all the above tricks to limit returned pages from the past year, although other options for a number of other default timescales are available (hour / day / week / month), as well as a facility to define a custom date-range too...
For anyone interested in investigating the above Google Search process, here's the above Google Search URL link itself that will show the above example in action -
https://www.google.com/search?q=site:lemonfool.co.uk+barclays%2Bdividend&tbs=qdr:y
Note from the above URL search results, that Google Search is clever enough to return both 'Barclays+dividend' results, as well as 'Barclays+dividends' results too, which is also another useful intelligent-search benefit of using the above Google process for these types of more granular searches...
Cheers,
Itsallaguess
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
- Has thanked: 1666 times
- Been thanked: 3840 times
Re: Why does Search ignore some really useful words?
Itsallaguess wrote:This is one of those situations where Google search is likely to give highly improved results over the limited internal search facilities here.
Google search can be asked to only look on specific sites, so we're able to force it to look at lemonfool.co.uk, and then we can add words to search for with a '+' between the words, which means that returned Lemon Fool pages will contain both 'Barclays' and 'dividend' if required.
In addition to that, we can then ask Google search to limit returned pages based on timescales, so on the example below, we're using all the above tricks to limit returned pages from the past year, although other options for a number of other default timescales are available (hour / day / week / month), as well as a facility to define a custom date-range too...
In addition, for those of us who like to use duckduckgo's anonymous searching, The Duck seems to do much the same:
Return to “Room 102 - Site Issues, Complaints & General Chat”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests