Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site
A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2226 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Hi folks,
Whilst I appreciate that the "Polite Discussions" board seems to divide opinion on TLF, one thing that I do find somewhat unusual about it is it's naming. I did mention this in another BB thread, however that post was off-topic at the time (was subsequently deleted), and in addition to being "thanked" by one member for the idea, it was suggested by Gengulphus that I repost in a specific thread. So here goes.
Anyway my point is that usage of the word "Polite" is inappropriate since polite is a subjective term, and even if that was not the case, should we infer that other boards are impolite?
So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
Comments welcome,
Matt
Whilst I appreciate that the "Polite Discussions" board seems to divide opinion on TLF, one thing that I do find somewhat unusual about it is it's naming. I did mention this in another BB thread, however that post was off-topic at the time (was subsequently deleted), and in addition to being "thanked" by one member for the idea, it was suggested by Gengulphus that I repost in a specific thread. So here goes.
Anyway my point is that usage of the word "Polite" is inappropriate since polite is a subjective term, and even if that was not the case, should we infer that other boards are impolite?
So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
Comments welcome,
Matt
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
- Has thanked: 4140 times
- Been thanked: 10032 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:
So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
Comments welcome.
I think it should stay as it is.
Your proposal would be too restrictive for a board that could contain any number of themes, and I really don't see problem at all with the phrase 'Polite Discussions', as it is hoped that the current board title acts as a persistent reminder as to the acceptable tone of the discussions allowed in it.
Itsallaguess
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2226 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Itsallaguess wrote:TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:
So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
Comments welcome.
I think it should stay as it is.
Your proposal would be too restrictive for a board that could contain any number of themes, and I really don't see any harm at all about the use of the phrase 'Polite Discussions', as it is hoped that the current board title acts as a persistent reminder as to the acceptable tone of the discussions allowed in it.
Itsallaguess
Sure, but shouldn't we act gracefully to others in all the boards? I have certainly witnessed snide and personal remarks in several of the investment boards. I would expect that behaviour to be viewed just as dimly anywhere on TLF.
Matt
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
- Has thanked: 4140 times
- Been thanked: 10032 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:Itsallaguess wrote:
I think it should stay as it is.
Your proposal would be too restrictive for a board that could contain any number of themes, and I really don't see any harm at all about the use of the phrase 'Polite Discussions', as it is hoped that the current board title acts as a persistent reminder as to the acceptable tone of the discussions allowed in it.
Sure, but shouldn't we act gracefully to others in all the boards?
I have certainly witnessed snide and personal remarks in several of the investment boards.
I would expect that behaviour to be viewed just as dimly anywhere on TLF.
Of course, and the general guidance regarding the range of acceptable behaviours for all the boards is contained within the site rules, which can be found here - https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/app.php/rules
So just because every individual board isn't prefixed with the word 'Polite' doesn't mean that such behaviour isn't expected at all times, as it clearly is, as defined in the above site rules.
The point about it being specifically spelt out on the 'Polite Discussions' board, is that it's broadly accepted that the 'Polite Discussions' board will act as a holding-ground for a very wide allowable range of debates of a much more robust nature, but whilst those robust debates are expected, it's also expected that they should be carried out in a 'Polite' manner, and I personally think that being persistently reminded about that fact on the way in the door can only be 'a good thing'...
Itsallaguess
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 409
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:43 am
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Itsallaguess wrote:
I really don't see problem at all with the phrase 'Polite Discussions', as it is hoped that the current board title acts as a persistent reminder as to the acceptable tone of the discussions allowed in it.
Itsallaguess
wot e sed
Rob
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18938
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 6677 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
A problem with that is that there is also an entire section of boards called "Polite Discussion and Debate".
"Polite Discussions" is just one member of that group, and so is "The Meaning of Life", which is for discussions about Philosophy and Religion:
viewforum.php?f=85
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2226 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Lootman wrote:TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
A problem with that is that there is also an entire section of boards called "Polite Discussion and Debate".
"Polite Discussions" is just one member of that group, and so is "The Meaning of Life", which is for discussions about Philosophy and Religion:
viewforum.php?f=85
Oh yeah. Given what you've just shared with me "Political debate" would seem more appropriate for the place I'm discussing. I really don't get the big hangup with the polite bit, this place (TLF) is just so tame by comparison with most of the chat on WWW. Which is fair enough, very good in fact . I don't think I've ever really had anything particularly rude said to me on PD. I'd just say, somewhat misguided, since it's usually just when folk get a bit personal, which were it not for the fact that it's obviously going to be off-topic (since no threads are actually "about me or any other LF"), it's also fairly amusing, since no one on here actually knows me as a "real person" anyway.
FWIW "Political" would thus seem to describe what's being debated in the board, rather than going to a board to discuss "Polite".
Matt
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8966
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1324 times
- Been thanked: 3696 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote: I really don't get the big hangup with the polite bit, this place (TLF) is just so tame by comparison with most of the chat on WWW. Which is fair enough, very good in fact . I don't think I've ever really had anything particularly rude said to me on PD.
Matt
Good. It seems to be working just fine then.
John
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 106
- Joined: November 21st, 2016, 11:44 am
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Isn't it time to institute a Brexit subforum (obviously requiring polite discussion)?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:17 am
- Has thanked: 3087 times
- Been thanked: 1559 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Hi Matt,
As explained in our PM exchange a week ago, the reason it is called Polite Discussions is as follows:
It could have a slightly more descriptive name but its discussion is broad and varied and the site's owners' desire is for the discussion to be polite. As others have said, its name is a constant reminder of that aspiration.
Clariman
As explained in our PM exchange a week ago, the reason it is called Polite Discussions is as follows:
Let me deal with PD first. I can see why you think "Polite Discussions" is a misnomer. Actually it was called that from day one and its name was aspirational, in the sense that we did not want it to end up being the den of bitter argument that we knew it had the potential to become (and perhaps has become). It was an attempt to set the tone.
It could have a slightly more descriptive name but its discussion is broad and varied and the site's owners' desire is for the discussion to be polite. As others have said, its name is a constant reminder of that aspiration.
Clariman
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: March 27th, 2017, 11:41 am
- Has thanked: 600 times
- Been thanked: 587 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Lootman wrote:TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:So what I'm suggesting is that members consider renaming the board to something more descriptive of what is actually being discussed. To get the ball rolling I'm proposing "Political, philosophical and religious debate".
A problem with that is that there is also an entire section of boards called "Polite Discussion and Debate".
"Polite Discussions" is just one member of that group, and so is "The Meaning of Life", which is for discussions about Philosophy and Religion:
viewforum.php?f=85
So why not just call it "General" to cover all the elements of "Polite Discussion and Debate" that aren't in the other sub-forums.
That said, I think the Lemon fool has far too many different sub-forums - its a complete maze to me.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2226 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
As Lootman shared with me earlier in this thread the whole subforum which PD currently occupies is called Polite Debate & Discussion, so the repetition of the word "Polite" seems a little profligate.
I've stated earlier that "Polite" is a subjective term, and given that forum threads which often start in "Beerpig Snug", which seem to deviate from what some would like to consider the ambience of a virtual safe space with beers are moved over to PD, it seems a little bit disingenuous at times.
Perhaps I'm just observing a schism here; one view being that "PD" is an exceptionally gentile area for very tame exchanges, so verbose as to hide any difference of opinion in treacle thick verbosity, and the second being that "PD" is a dumping ground either for discussions originating in other boards which have gone awry (so probably are not particularly polite according to some) or ones which somehow not seem to fit anywhere else but the site still wants to host.
?
Matt
I've stated earlier that "Polite" is a subjective term, and given that forum threads which often start in "Beerpig Snug", which seem to deviate from what some would like to consider the ambience of a virtual safe space with beers are moved over to PD, it seems a little bit disingenuous at times.
Perhaps I'm just observing a schism here; one view being that "PD" is an exceptionally gentile area for very tame exchanges, so verbose as to hide any difference of opinion in treacle thick verbosity, and the second being that "PD" is a dumping ground either for discussions originating in other boards which have gone awry (so probably are not particularly polite according to some) or ones which somehow not seem to fit anywhere else but the site still wants to host.
?
Matt
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3858
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
I navigate the forum by using a link which gives recent postings. That is not selective by topic.
/search.php?search_id=newposts
I think there is a good argument for calling a forum "Polite Discussions" as people do tend to go OTT at times on some topics. Parliament requires members to refer to each other in the third person in an attempt to reduce aggression. Hence I am quite happy with the status quo.
/search.php?search_id=newposts
I think there is a good argument for calling a forum "Polite Discussions" as people do tend to go OTT at times on some topics. Parliament requires members to refer to each other in the third person in an attempt to reduce aggression. Hence I am quite happy with the status quo.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2226 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
johnhemming wrote:I think there is a good argument for calling a forum "Polite Discussions" as people do tend to go OTT at times on some topics. Parliament requires members to refer to each other in the third person in an attempt to reduce aggression.
With all due respect, I appreciate being treated with civility in all the TLFs boards. Certainly how I play.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:17 am
- Has thanked: 3087 times
- Been thanked: 1559 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:Perhaps I'm just observing a schism here; one view being that "PD" is an exceptionally gentile area for very tame exchanges, so verbose as to hide any difference of opinion in treacle thick verbosity, and the second being that "PD" is a dumping ground either for discussions originating in other boards which have gone awry (so probably are not particularly polite according to some) or ones which somehow not seem to fit anywhere else but the site still wants to host.
It is neither. We want it to do what it says on the tin.. Discussion can be robust in terms of powerful logic and argument, but it should remain polite and respectful. It may not live up to that but we will not be budged from that aspiration.
Clariman
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 119
- Joined: September 28th, 2019, 3:48 am
- Has thanked: 112 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Clariman wrote:TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:Perhaps I'm just observing a schism here; one view being that "PD" is an exceptionally gentile area for very tame exchanges, so verbose as to hide any difference of opinion in treacle thick verbosity, and the second being that "PD" is a dumping ground either for discussions originating in other boards which have gone awry (so probably are not particularly polite according to some) or ones which somehow not seem to fit anywhere else but the site still wants to host.
It is neither. We want it to do what it says on the tin.. Discussion can be robust in terms of powerful logic and argument, but it should remain polite and respectful. It may not live up to that but we will not be budged from that aspiration.
Clariman
If, hypothetically I posted a thread saying: "There are only two genders" and mounted a respectful and logical defence of the proposition it would still be in the bin. You know it and I know it. I flounced off after a discussion about the existence of dyslexia as a diagnosis was canned despite it being pretty positive and educational.
So colour me disbelieving. The PD Board is a leftist PC echo chamber and any non-conformism gets blackholed, pronto.
Thanks for the boards, but it is plain as day that there are a whole bunch of taboo topics that can never get discussed here, no matter how polite and logical the participants. It's your gaff, your rules, and thats how it is. I understand why, its bloody hard to run a public webforum while maintaining some free speech.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
JoyofBricks8 wrote:Clariman wrote:It is neither. We want it to do what it says on the tin.. Discussion can be robust in terms of powerful logic and argument, but it should remain polite and respectful. It may not live up to that but we will not be budged from that aspiration.
Clariman
If, hypothetically I posted a thread saying: "There are only two genders" and mounted a respectful and logical defence of the proposition it would still be in the bin. You know it and I know it. I flounced off after a discussion about the existence of dyslexia as a diagnosis was canned despite it being pretty positive and educational.
I remember the "dyslexia" (actually 'Dislexia'!) discussion. I too was annoyed by it being curtailed - in a very summary way, with no warning or explanation. Due to protests its closure was up for review but, as explained at the time, the OP (You?) left TLF and asked for all their posts to be deleted, so it was not reinstated.
viewtopic.php?f=91&t=15662
JoyofBricks8 wrote:So colour me disbelieving. The PD Board is a leftist PC echo chamber and any non-conformism gets blackholed, pronto.
Hardly! I could just as easily (and with more justification) claim it as a 'rightist anti-PC echo chamber'.
JoyofBricks8 wrote:Thanks for the boards, but it is plain as day that there are a whole bunch of taboo topics that can never get discussed here, no matter how polite and logical the participants. It's your gaff, your rules, and thats how it is. I understand why, its bloody hard to run a public webforum while maintaining some free speech.
Advertisers and commercial interests. It's the market...
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3246
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2226 times
- Been thanked: 588 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
JoyofBricks8 wrote:I understand why, its bloody hard to run a public webforum while maintaining some free speech.
JoB, whilst it's nice to get the chance to agree with you every once in a while, I didn't actually realise it was that difficult....
To be honest, I've posted from time to time on the "Political and Religious" forum on a US-hosted site "arboristsite.com". Usually about Trump, Climate change or Brexit. It is mainly frequented by the most stupid, vile, racist, homophobic, etc. etc. right wing nutters, and the site does run ads, is free (though it has "sponsors"), and has been going for years (at least 10?), and doesn't seem to be in any risk of being closed down due to "legal issues" due the language used in it's P&R board.
My point is 1) the LF is very tame by comparison, which doesn't surprise me at all, (and is clearly a Good Thing), 2) the risks of any kind of legal issues due to what has ever been on TLF's boards seem incredibly remote given what occurs on a daily basis on either sites like the one I cite above, or FB, Snapchat, Twitter, Advfn etc. etc.
No, I'm not suggesting that TLF should drop it's standards, just maybe be a little more realistic about the types of debates and discussions grown ups frequently have, or drop the pretence of hosting them.
Matt
EDIT Do some sites and forums operate with different legal constraints regards what posters can and can't say when online?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7383
- Joined: February 7th, 2017, 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 10514 times
- Been thanked: 4659 times
Re: A proposal to relabel the Polite Discussions board
Is it worth asking ourselves if we have a sense of entitlement to something?
And if so is that belief driving our interpration of events?
If we feel that free speech is being impeded on TLF we can of course elect, freely, to use another forum. It's a radical thought but probably worth considering given the gravity of the subject.
I often reflect on issues. I suppose that could be the sign of an over-thinker. This is a small forum. It's free. Even the subscription isn't astronomical. And I have received much advice from other users, I hasten to add some of it useful. All given freely.
I don't recall having thought at any time that my freedom of speech was being muted. I think the site is well managed. And as I've said the freedom I have to use any other sites is there for me to take.
AiY
And if so is that belief driving our interpration of events?
If we feel that free speech is being impeded on TLF we can of course elect, freely, to use another forum. It's a radical thought but probably worth considering given the gravity of the subject.
I often reflect on issues. I suppose that could be the sign of an over-thinker. This is a small forum. It's free. Even the subscription isn't astronomical. And I have received much advice from other users, I hasten to add some of it useful. All given freely.
I don't recall having thought at any time that my freedom of speech was being muted. I think the site is well managed. And as I've said the freedom I have to use any other sites is there for me to take.
AiY
Return to “Room 102 - Site Issues, Complaints & General Chat”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests