Page 1 of 1

Yahoo weirdness

Posted: April 1st, 2019, 11:51 am
by spiderbill
Seeing some odd results this morning in Yahoo and in spreadsheets that use its data.

A lot of the shares in my portfolio list are still showing a timestamp of 5:35PM BST (ie last Friday close) and are showing the price at that time.
e.g. GSK is showing 1,596.80
I can understand that with some shares that are not frequently traded but not in something popular like GSK. At around 9:45 UK time I was seeing half of my portfolio unchanged from Friday.

In some cases HYPTUSS seems to be pulling out an updated figure (GSK 1605.00) but Eventide's Excel plugin is still seeing the old one (1,596.80)

So unless Yahoo is playing an April Fool there seems to be something not quite right, so best don't rely on prices without checking multiple sources. Hopefully it'll sort itself out soon.

cheers

Spiderbill

Re: Yahoo weirdness

Posted: April 9th, 2019, 1:18 pm
by schober
Yahoo price data flakiness
MIDD &S250 have missing decimal points
L250 not been updated for 2 weeeks!

Re: Yahoo weirdness

Posted: June 10th, 2019, 10:34 am
by spiderbill
Yahoo data flakey again.
Most shares in my portfolio are showing market timestamps from last Friday and no mini charts. Price data is same as at close on Friday.
Don't rely on anything without checking your broker price first.

Re: Yahoo weirdness

Posted: June 10th, 2019, 12:15 pm
by spiderbill
Seems to be a lot better now with most timestamps showing around 11.50-ish.
Fingers crossed it stays up to date for the rest of the day.

Re: Yahoo weirdness

Posted: June 10th, 2019, 1:18 pm
by Itsallaguess
spiderbill wrote:
Seeing some odd results this morning in Yahoo and in spreadsheets that use its data.


In case you're not aware, after the previous bout of Yahoo flakiness kiloran devised a back-up price-feed that can be imported into Excel or LibrOffice using a Google Finance price-feed -

Most investment tools and spreadsheets use Yahoo as a source of share price. It's very rapid and can handle hundreds of shares with a single query. Generally, it works very well, but when it has a problem with one or more shares, we tend to get very frustrated.

Data can be obtained from many other web pages, but this tends to be complicated and much slower, since a separate query is needed for each share.

Google can handle multiple shares with a single query, using a Google Docs spreadsheet and the GoogleFinance function, but many/most investors prefer to have the data in a "real" spreadsheet such as Excel or LibreOffice.

Here's a solution which imports and automatically refreshes data from Google Docs to Excel or LibreOffice. Once the data is in Excel or LibreOffice, prices can be extracted to other sheets using VLOOKUP or INDEX/MATCH functions


https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=17858

http://lemonfoolfinancialsoftware.weebly.com/googleprice.html

It might be worth creating a spare worksheet on your spreadsheet and giving the above a go, even as just an alternative to either use if Yahoo is flaky, or to confirm any odd prices that you might have doubts about via your normal price-feeds.

I'm sure any feedback with the above process, if you give it a go, would be gratefully received on the above linked thread.

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

Re: Yahoo weirdness

Posted: June 10th, 2019, 2:13 pm
by schober
AFAICS the problems are with UK etfs and IT's
Missing rows and decimal points in the wrong place

Re: Yahoo weirdness

Posted: June 11th, 2019, 9:31 pm
by spiderbill
Itsallaguess wrote:In case you're not aware, after the previous bout of Yahoo flakiness kiloran devised a back-up price-feed that can be imported into Excel or LibrOffice using a Google Finance price-feed -

It might be worth creating a spare worksheet on your spreadsheet and giving the above a go, even as just an alternative to either use if Yahoo is flaky, or to confirm any odd prices that you might have doubts about via your normal price-feeds.

I'm sure any feedback with the above process, if you give it a go, would be gratefully received on the above linked thread.


I'd somehow missed that; thanks for pointing it out. I'll certainly give it a try and report back with anything that comes up.

Much obliged

Spiderbill