redsturgeon wrote:I believe most students these days take out a loan for tuition fees at £9000 pa plus a maintenance loan of around £9000 per year for living away from home. Since most will never pay back their loan they probably view this as free money. If they end up borrowing £45k or £55k what difference does it make if you aim to pay neither back in full, the payment each month being based on your salary rather than the debt.
John
For students who can assess their future earnings potential and figure out that they will never repay their debt, yet always be paying the "graduate tax" then they might as well max out the loan - after all, it really is free money at that point (assuming the rules don't change).
Unfortunately, there will be a large segment of the student population who take away a different message; that debt doesn't matter. Once you start to think that being £50k in debt is OK, then what's another £k or two? Of course, there's a massive difference between student debt and pretty much all other kinds of debt, but not all students (or their parents) seem to be able to grasp this fact.
The ones I feel sorry for are those who wouldn't have to pay it back (based on earnings) but who struggle to minimise their student debt anyway, having been brought up to be debt-averse, with their parents helping out as well, not realising they are pouring money down the drain (from their point of view, if not the tax payer's).
As for the £450 - regardless of whether it was added to a never-to-be-repaid student loan or not, I can think of better uses!
Just as an aside, if a student is likely to never repay the debt, would it make sense to max out the loan and invest it somewhere (a LISA, or in a global tracker for example)?
VRD