Prince William ‘worried’ about Harry’s mental health

[csearle]

Rich kid. We all have our crosses to bear. I wish him well, as I wish everyone well. Life ain't always easy.

[GoSeigen]

I must read the right papers; I hadn't read a word about that and find it difficult to believe. They both always look so happy and William seems far to nice and sensible to betray his lovely wife and children. Why on earth would he want to? Who could be better from every point of view than Kate?

LOL, what was wrong with Diana, William and Harry?

GS

[JoyofBricks8]

Meghan is a hypocrite.

This is the root cause of her problems.

Not racism.

It is not racist to point out hypocrisy.

[JoyofBricks8]

Rich kid. We all have our crosses to bear. I wish him well, as I wish everyone well. Life ain't always easy.

I don’t. Not when I am being called a racist for criticising hypocrisy. See Jamelias spoutings today, summoned in defence of her buddy calling critics of Megan filthy racists.

That’s one sure way to make enemies. Unjust accusations.

Look at Brexit. Call me a racist there, and now look: I am implacably opposed to the EU where before I was amenable to compromise.

Same here. Mild and logical criticism is met with the slur of racist. Why should I give anything Megan supporters say a hearing, when they make such vile accusations.

A pox on them.

[swill453]

Rich kid. We all have our crosses to bear. I wish him well, as I wish everyone well. Life ain't always easy.

I don’t. Not when I am being called a racist for criticising hypocrisy.

You're not being called a racist for criticising hypocrisy.

Racists are being called racist for being racist.

Scott.

[JoyofBricks8]

Rich kid. We all have our crosses to bear. I wish him well, as I wish everyone well. Life ain't always easy.

I don’t. Not when I am being called a racist for criticising hypocrisy.

You're not being called a racist for criticising hypocrisy.

Racists are being called racist for being racist.

Scott.

Oh yeah? You insinuated that Mail readers are racist earlier: do I have to bring up quotes?

Save you breath for someone who you haven’t called a racist. Blocking you for prejudice

[swill453]

Oh yeah? You insinuated that Mail readers are racist earlier: do I have to bring up quotes?

Nope. Mail journalists. Some of them anyway.

I didn't mention readers. In fact I admitted to being an occasional one myself.

Scott.

[JoyofBricks8]

Oh yeah? You insinuated that Mail readers are racist earlier: do I have to bring up quotes?

Nope. Mail journalists. Some of them anyway.

I didn't mention readers. In fact I admitted to being an occasional one myself.

Scott.

Gonna name names? Or are you too chicken to face the legal consequences?

[bungeejumper]

Oh yeah? You insinuated that Mail readers are racist earlier: do I have to bring up quotes?

Nope. Mail journalists. Some of them anyway.

I didn't mention readers. In fact I admitted to being an occasional one myself.

I wouldn't waste your breath, Scott. Poor Bricksy is just ranting again. Any day now, he'll change his Fool name for the third time this year, and then we'll be back to rinse and repeat.

BJ

[JoyofBricks8]

But this horrible press treatment he's been getting this year from the Scum and the Wail - tinged, to no-one's surprise, with racist overtones ...
BJ

Inciting hate against journalists is so classy : “Scum”?

I take it you are not going to be brave enough to name names of these journalist racists either.

More smear tactics. Pretty repellent actually.

[JoyofBricks8]

Since no one has actually seen fit to put up any actual evidence of racism in the press coverage, would it be better to leave aside the question of racism as not proven, and cease to use such slurs on journalists covering the Sussexes?

I mean, assuming good faith is a good rule, right?

Why should I have to defend the free press here against unevidenced slurs?

[swill453]

Since no one has actually seen fit to put up any actual evidence of racism in the press coverage, would it be better to leave aside the question of racism as not proven, and cease to use such slurs on journalists covering the Sussexes?

I mean, assuming good faith is a good rule, right?

I did, but you didn't see it because you blocked me.

Scott.

[JoyofBricks8]

Sod it why bother?

Mods delete this account.

I can’t bear to consort with you all right now.

[UncleIan]

Sod it why bother?

Mods delete this account.

I can’t bear to consort with you all right now.

Honest question...You okay? No really, are you okay? Because from this end, it kind of looks like you're ranting and raving and blocking at the slightest thing, it, well, honestly, I'm a bit concerned. Is there someone you can talk to? Or a walk in the beautiful autumn countryside you could go on?

[Arborbridge]

Yawn, can't really see why people are bothered about this or interested?

I suppose it's better than having a President Kinnock though as a 'figurehead'

Why Kinnock, particularly? Anyhow, I'd say better than having any president. You have only to look at the US to see what a mess it becomes, where only the richest get a look in. Yes, we have a rich family as a monarchy, but at least it saves us the expensive farce of having to elect a president every n years.

Keep it as it is.


Arb.

[sg31]

Sod it why bother?

Mods delete this account.

I can’t bear to consort with you all right now.

Good post. Best flounce in ages.

[Arborbridge]

Sod it why bother?

Mods delete this account.

I can’t bear to consort with you all right now.

That's probably a good idea - it seems you might need some "time out", for you do seem to be unable to accept that other people disagree with you quite often. You seem strangely at odds with the world. It happens to everyone now and again - perhaps time to re-assess your perspective in general.

Arb.

[tjh290633]

Moderator Message:
There is too much acrimony on this thread, so I am locking it.

TJH