Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site

Fake Stamps

A virtual pub for off topic, light hearted pub related banter and discussion. No trainers
jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2565
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1108 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Fake Stamps

#643441

Postby jfgw » January 29th, 2024, 4:09 pm

It seems that even ones bought from the post office might not be genuine, https://www.gbnews.com/money/royal-mail-counterfeit-stamps-scandal.

This does not just apply to the new, barcoded stamps, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/03/royal-mail-stamp-chaos-post-office-barcodes/.

Fakes can be very good copies and can have security features such as the UV ink bands and correct perforations. Some fakes are easier to spot than others, however, https://news.sky.com/story/royal-mail-investigates-fake-diane-abbott-stamps-11716853.

The post office now charge £5 for a letter with unpaid postage. The "fee to pay" card gives very little information about the nature of the letter or package, not even the recipient's first name or initials.


Julian F. G. W.

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7992
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 993 times
Been thanked: 3662 times

Re: Fake Stamps

#643458

Postby swill453 » January 29th, 2024, 5:34 pm

jfgw wrote:The post office now charge £5 for a letter with unpaid postage. The "fee to pay" card gives very little information about the nature of the letter or package, not even the recipient's first name or initials.

Isn't it Royal Mail who make the charge, not the Post Office?

Scott.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2565
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1108 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: Fake Stamps

#643459

Postby jfgw » January 29th, 2024, 5:35 pm

swill453 wrote:
jfgw wrote:The post office now charge £5 for a letter with unpaid postage. The "fee to pay" card gives very little information about the nature of the letter or package, not even the recipient's first name or initials.

Isn't it Royal Mail who make the charge, not the Post Office?

Scott.


I stand corrected.


Julian F. G. W.

stevensfo
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3502
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 8:43 am
Has thanked: 3889 times
Been thanked: 1424 times

Re: Fake Stamps

#643890

Postby stevensfo » January 31st, 2024, 11:30 am

jfgw wrote:It seems that even ones bought from the post office might not be genuine, https://www.gbnews.com/money/royal-mail-counterfeit-stamps-scandal.

This does not just apply to the new, barcoded stamps, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/03/royal-mail-stamp-chaos-post-office-barcodes/.

Fakes can be very good copies and can have security features such as the UV ink bands and correct perforations. Some fakes are easier to spot than others, however, https://news.sky.com/story/royal-mail-investigates-fake-diane-abbott-stamps-11716853.

The post office now charge £5 for a letter with unpaid postage. The "fee to pay" card gives very little information about the nature of the letter or package, not even the recipient's first name or initials.


Julian F. G. W.


The "fee to pay" card gives very little information about the nature of the letter or package, not even the recipient's first name or initials.

I'm surprised they're allowed to get away with this sort of procedure. Overtones of blackmail?

Seems like a potential 'nice little earner' for the Royal Mail.

Simply print millions of unstamped postcards with random addresses and wait for the money to start rolling in. ;)

Steve


Return to “Beerpig's Snug”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests