AleisterCrowley wrote:St Cross?
Yes but no St Bernard!
John
Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site
AleisterCrowley wrote:St Cross?
redsturgeon wrote:Its a bit like this view.
https://www.weirdoptics.com/dalmatian-c ... -illusion/
My dog is a White Parson Russell Terrier with dark ears, wearing a dark coat. She is walking away from the camera.
John
redsturgeon wrote:Its a bit like this view.
https://www.weirdoptics.com/dalmatian-c ... -illusion/
My dog is a White Parson Russell Terrier with dark ears, wearing a dark coat. She is walking away from the camera.
John
"The beautiful Mount Olstinden has almost the same shape as the roof of this cute yellow cabin. And the yellow colour creates some amazing contrast to the snow-covered mountain......Beiter has made a few changes. He said: "I've removed a small cabin in the left side during post process. Beside that, colour correction, contrast and sharpness has been done in Lightroom and Photoshop."
Richard Frishman's Sunday Buffet at Jerry Mikeska's BBQ won the Still Life section. "I found this curious juxtaposition while looking for lunch in rural Texas, the heart of hunting country," he said."Authentic to the scene depicted, this highly detailed image is constructed of over 100 individual photographs meticulously stitched together."
bungeejumper wrote:Richard Frishman's Sunday Buffet at Jerry Mikeska's BBQ won the Still Life section. "I found this curious juxtaposition while looking for lunch in rural Texas, the heart of hunting country," he said."Authentic to the scene depicted, this highly detailed image is constructed of over 100 individual photographs meticulously stitched together."
Grrr again. It might be art, but it ain't photography. Anybody agree?
redsturgeon wrote:That's fine but I would not denigrate those for whom the original image is merely the starting point for the creation of an image they have in their head
redsturgeon wrote:Even in the most straightforward photograph though, there are decisions that a photographer makes that can all change the message given. The choice of the moment when to press the shutter is key but what focal length of lens to use, what shutter speed, how to frame the image, what viewpoint to take, whether to make a black and white or colour image, these were all decisions that had to be made before the advent of photoshop and digital photography.
So even an image of an event straight out of the camera can look very different and can show many different "truths" about one moment without being tampered with in any way after the event.
I have a relative who photographs professionally for the National Trust and the Forestry Commission, and who also covers many of the big archaeological digs. He gets onto his mountain bike at four in the morning to catch the sun coming up over Pen y Fan, or climbs behind a waterfall to get the right shot of the sunlight coming off the falling water. He'd spit on the floor if you mentioned Photoshop. Indeed, I've seen him do it.
melonfool wrote:My photos look very dull in comparison.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests