tjh290633 wrote:Wizard wrote:So in your view, for a pot builder you think it better to have a smaller pot as long as you have more income that is not yet being drawn. Bizarre.
Not at all. My view is that the objective is to build a growing income from dividends and to reinvest them until required.
Your view is that it is better to hold on to a non-payer that has fallen from its previous levels, which I do not understand.
TJH
Well I guess we will not agree, I do not know how somebody can prefer income when it is not required at the expense of a lower income at a time when it will be needed. You prefer the income now when it is not required in exchange for a lower income in the future. As somebody here frequently says, each to their own.