Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Comparing CTY.L to Drawdown HYP

General discussions about equity high-yield income strategies
1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4397
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 690 times
Been thanked: 1339 times

Re: Comparing CTY.L to Drawdown HYP

#321175

Postby 1nvest » June 24th, 2020, 7:27 pm

As another benchmark, the FTSE250 is comprised of around 20% Investment Trusts, and also tends to avoid the single stocks being 10% of the total index type situations that can arise with large cap indexes (FT250 feeds both in and out of the top and bottom).

I've assumed the exact same income as HYP being drawn by selling down total return, using MIDD.L total return as the FT250 fund.

Image

Wizard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2829
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 8:22 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 1029 times

Re: Comparing CTY.L to Drawdown HYP

#321189

Postby Wizard » June 24th, 2020, 8:24 pm

CryptoPlankton wrote:
Wizard wrote:
MDW1954 wrote:
Moorfield,

Check the HYP-P board. You may be pleasantly surprised.

MDW1954

But you may be less pleasantly surprised to see a debate has broken out as to what the upper boundary of "circa. 5%" is :lol: But that isn't enough, it now looks like you need to answer the question "circa. 5%" of what? Current value, initial investment or some other metric yet to be suggested? The HYP-P board is priceless, there must be a comedy show in there somewhere :lol: I really do feel for anyone asked to moderate that board, I'm surprised anyone is still willing to do the 'job'.


I'd say things have certainly improved over there since the change in guidelines - that particular issue only really required the application of a little common sense. Generally, from this reader's point of view, the discussions are definitely benefiting from less disruption.This board, however, would now seem to be the one to come to for the "amusing" comments - although I suspect it may eventually wear a little thin when people realise they don't get the same rise from the readership here that they could with a good wind up over there. Who knows, maybe then the discussions will become more focussed on wider high yield investment strategies.

Well, I can live in hope :)

Yes, I agree, less disruption, but less discussion as well. I guess once you lose the baiting and arguing there really is little new to say on HYP-P, but then none of that was really new either.

AJC5001
Lemon Slice
Posts: 448
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 4:55 pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Comparing CTY.L to Drawdown HYP

#321190

Postby AJC5001 » June 24th, 2020, 8:29 pm

1nvest wrote:As another benchmark, the FTSE250 is comprised of around 20% Investment Trusts, and also tends to avoid the single stocks being 10% of the total index type situations that can arise with large cap indexes (FT250 feeds both in and out of the top and bottom).

I've assumed the exact same income as HYP being drawn by selling down total return, using MIDD.L total return as the FT250 fund.

Image


A few points :-

1. MIDD is an ETF - My understanding is there is no Stamp Duty on iShares ETFs as they are Irish domiciled.

2. MIDD has a yield of 3.31%, so selling down is only needed if that is insufficient.

3. MIDD has an OCF of 0.40% according to HL https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/i/ishares-plc-ftse-250

4. Vanguard also have a FTSE250 ETF which has a yield of 4.12% and OCF of 0.10% so may be a better choice? https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/v/vanguard-funds-ftse-250-ucits-etf

5. Vanguard also do an Accumulation version - VMIG with the same OCF https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/v/vanguard-ftse-250-ucits-etf-acc if you want dividens reinvested. Then selling down could be used for any income when needed. (I couldn't find an Accumulation iShares ETF)

6. Other FTSE250 etfs are available https://tools.morningstar.co.uk/uk/etfquickrank/default.aspx?Site=UK&Universe=ETALL%24%24ALL&category=EUCA000852&LanguageId=en-GB

Adrian

MDW1954
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2361
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:46 pm
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1011 times

Re: Comparing CTY.L to Drawdown HYP

#321197

Postby MDW1954 » June 24th, 2020, 9:14 pm

AJC5001 wrote:4. Vanguard also have a FTSE250 ETF which has a yield of 4.12% and OCF of 0.10% so may be a better choice? https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/v/vanguard-funds-ftse-250-ucits-etf

5. Vanguard also do an Accumulation version - VMIG with the same OCF https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/v/vanguard-ftse-250-ucits-etf-acc if you want dividens reinvested. Then selling down could be used for any income when needed. (I couldn't find an Accumulation iShares ETF)

Adrian


I'm always quite surprised that people still buy MIDD. If it's all about the OCF, then Vanguard wins hands down.

MDW1954

1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4397
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 690 times
Been thanked: 1339 times

Re: Comparing CTY.L to Drawdown HYP

#321324

Postby 1nvest » June 25th, 2020, 11:12 am

Vanguard's FT250 version, with no stamp duty being applicable ...

£258,301.73	Capital	
£258,292.73 Less £9.99 trade fee to buy VMID
Value Income drawn Sell trade fee
5th April 2019 £258,292.73
3rd April 2020 £174,148.33 £14673.22 £9.99
12th June 2020 £210,542.97 £1003.25 £9.99

... with same income as HYP being drawn out of total return


Return to “High Yield Shares & Strategies - General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests