MDW1954 wrote:What you're saying is that instead of holding individual shares, you want to move to a scenario where you're holding what will probably be substantially the same shares, but held inside ITs at higher cost.
What exactly are the maintenance issues that you're trying to avoid???
MDW1954
With a portfolio of HYP shares vs a lesser number of ITs you are likely to have to spend more time processing admin, maybe corporate actions, possibly even more time fretting over reduced/stopped divis etc.
I'm in my mid 50s, been with TMF/TLF for 20+ years, started a HYP (inspired by TMF) about 10 years ago as I started to think about converting portions of my long term funds/trackers (in ISAs and GAs) into income producing things. I've been mostly a self employed contractor and didn't have any significant pensions in place/plan.
I was originally intending to step back from work a little (what's the correct term for doing no/little proper work but not retiring) in summer 21 after my youngest would be finishing school, but haven't done so yet as covid would have restricted many initial plans. Roll on summer 22 for take 2.
But I did start some rehearsal of what less-work would like like and a year ago converted a significant chunk of funds/trackers and some less-favoured HYP shares into a group/basket of income focused ITs, all in ISAs split across myself and my wife's accounts. We've been drawing target income initially at 50%, now at 75% of our current needs. 80% of this is IT derived, and is fairly predictable, and in the spirit of 'rehearsing' less-work, it gives off a warm comfortable feeling. The other 20% is still HYP shares derived - more volatile, more exciting, capital swings with oil prices, war in Ukraine.
The rehearsal period has showed me a few things about myself and the various aspects I might face as I work less, both to do with income, and certainty, but also for example that I know I'm not ready to go for 100% work to 0% work in one go.
Depending on an individual's approach to risk, their appetite for involvement, decision-making, and other aspects, an income group ITs can provide a similar strategic outcome as an income HYP, but with more comfort and less input.
I still hold a smaller HYP of about 18 shares, and still enjoy the day-to-day of market news and activity, but it's not the bread and butter. Over time I may convert some/all of this.
I think there's a psychological parallel in this IT/HYP thing similar to the one about not paying the mortgage off and using the lending to invest and generate higher returns elsewhere. Yes that can be true, but for many people there can be more comfort derived from the certainty of finishing the mortgage. I think it also relates to lifestage where many people are comfortable they have built the pot, and now it's more about preserving the pot than aggressively increasing it.
The rehearsal period has also highlighted one or two areas where I'd taken the eye off the ball. We don't use our annual CGT allowances most years. I have been following many of the recent total return threads, where the argument has been that you can generate better income by following TR and then just selling units as required for income. With income ITs + HYP providing the bulk of income, it will be my intention to use excess funds to rebuild the balances in our GAs with simple world trackers, then flip them annually and sell units within the CGT allowances.
Apologies for the ramble, but the simple comment above on HYP vs IT prompted some thoughts about these and the various things that can be going on under the surface, at least in the heads of some people. I think I've paid too much attention to the last year's rehearsal....
BigB