Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

Discuss Stock buying Shares, tips and ideas for stock market dealing
WalbrockResearch821
Posts: 39
Joined: February 2nd, 2017, 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 29 times

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#57198

Postby WalbrockResearch821 » June 1st, 2017, 7:20 pm

Moderator Message:
I have very slightly edited this to minimise any possibility that this is viewed as an advertisement. Please bear in mind that we have to tread a careful line in this respect. We are unsure of what is the exact line, but there is a '"sniff test" that it is preferable to not even need to deploy. Thank you for your understanding. regards, dspp


Reposted here on TLF with permission of the original copyright holder. All images links are charts I've created and helps to interpret the text.

Sometimes if you want to pick the right stock for your portfolio, then you need to study successful companies that deliver to shareholders. One company that has delivered is WH Smiths. Now, we need to dissect the key drivers that drove WH Smiths share price to record highs.

N.B.: This post isn’t recommending WH Smiths shares, but it is an education.

How did WH Smiths defy the odds

WH Smiths is one of the oldest businesses in the UK (Founded in the 18th Century). Having survived the financial crisis, it makes hay and grew from strength to strength.

Image

Trading profits from both divisions grew by £87m in eleven years. One huge factor is due to winding down its high-street division (or, so we believed).

http://i.imgur.com/5dERMhp.jpg

WH Smiths has drastically cut down their high-street division as sales collapsed from £1,112m to £639m, a near 50% drop.

Lesson: - When you see declining revenue, don’t assume the business is bad.

Always look at their gross and operating margins.
Their travel division has doubled in sales, with profits more than tripling. This is because more people are travelling via rails and planes.

The rebirth of British Rail
Image

The growth of air travel
Image

Okay, we know the basics on how WH Smiths have turned around their business. Now, we turn our attention to the details of their financials and operations.

WH Smiths Good Points

Increasing Profitability

One key attribute behind WH Smiths increasing operating margins have been their ability to reduce external costs. Increasing Gross Margins has helped Smiths to improve operating margins by 3-fold. That’s despite rising rental expenses and staff costs.

Image

Able to pay higher wages

Talking about staff costs, you would think the National Living Wage would pose a threat by increasing their operational expenses. So far, Smiths was able to raise average wages from £10,600 to £14,700. You might think this is still low for annual pay, but, you have to take into account the part-timers, under 21s, etc. Those working part-time could be earning £7k per annum (I’m guessing here). Meanwhile, you have store managers and high ranking staff members who are paid higher salaries, which helped to lift the average cost per employee.

One helpful factor is Smiths was able to keep up with the times and cut staff numbers.

Since 2005, Smiths has cut their workforce by 28% and that has given the company an ability to meet minimum pay increases. Also, it manages to help boost revenue productivity per worker.

Image

That saw an increase from £75.5k in 2005 to £88.4k in 2016.

How was WH Smiths able to achieve these efficiencies gains?

The obvious reason was to assume closure from loss-making stores in their high-street division (refer to the big falls in revenue). The other reason is the increased use of self-service checkouts. You can also point to factors like low inflation and closure of several competitors like Woolworths. Then there is the sales boost from their “busier” travel division.

A Stagnating Business requires less Capital Spending

A look at free cash flow would tell you if a business is spending “crazy” amounts of money or spending enough to maintain their assets.

In WH Smiths case, free cash flow is producing high cash inflows numbers. On average, it accounts for 70% of operating cash flow. And this shows in the capex/depreciation ratio (%). Since 2005, maintenance (depreciation) amounted to £439m vs. capex’s £422m, that’s 96% maintenance coverage!

Image

This gel well when you compare it to the change in sales from £1.423bn to £1.212bn in the same period, a shrinkage of 13%.

Knowing How to Reward its Shareholders

Whatever you think of WH Smiths, the retailer knows how to reward their shareholders. The dividend yield is 2.2%. Add in the share buybacks it is yielding “something” like 4.5%.

I say “something like” because shareholders need to sell their shares in return for cash. Every time, Smiths does a buyback, the shareholders hold fewer WH Smiths shares. Unlike, the dividends where you receive a straight-up cash payment without any strings attached.
Here is the change in Smiths share buybacks and dividends.

Image

How would you fair in ten years, as a WH Smiths Shareholder?

Imagine you purchase 100,000 Smiths shares in 2006 and you pay an average £3.12 per share. That amounts to an initial investment of £312,000 (ignoring transaction fees). After ten years, you would want to ask the following questions:

A. How much would you receive in dividends?
B. How has the share buybacks added to your returns?
C. The number of Smiths shares you will end up by 2016.
D. What is the total return from both the dividends and share buybacks? (In % and absolutes)
E. How much will your WH Smiths shares be worth?
F. What are the total returns after ten years from realised and unrealised gains?

Corresponding Answers

A. After ten years, you would receive a total of £198,908 in dividends.
B. Smith’s share buyback would have contributed a further £189,400 to your coffers.
C. By 2016, the amounts of WH Smiths shares in your portfolio has fallen to 61,749.
D. In ten years, you would have gotten back 63.75% of your original investment via dividends, and 60.7% via share buybacks. So, the total return comes to £388,300.
E. We know that the initial value of WH Smiths shares were £312,000 in 2006. By the end of 2016, your unrealised WH Smiths shares are valued at £1,004,965, a 222% appreciation.
F. Combining these returns (realised or unrealised), your total return is 346%.
The details of your £100,000 investment “year after year” is shown below:

Image

WH Smiths share price without the Buybacks

What would WH Smiths share price look like without the buybacks?
It would look like this:

Image

If we were to assume WH Smiths didn’t do any buybacks, but instead, pay it all in dividends, the number of share outstanding would remain the same.

And using the average market capitalisation in 2016 of £1,839m, then Smiths shares would be worth £10.04 each, instead of £16.27.

That’s enough praise for WH Smiths. Now we search for any possible red flags or weakness in Smiths business model.

WH Smiths Bad Points

When you see growing profits and increasing shareholders return, you can be forgiven for overlooking any weaknesses in the WH Smiths business model.

But, one thing I noticed or doesn’t gel well with the company increasing profitability is their collapsing inventory turnover. That is a concern if you consider that the majority of its business relies on selling goods, rather than services.

Image

One reason is Smiths numerator “Costs of goods sold” has collapsed, but still, they should manage to reduce their inventory levels along with declining sales.

The negative of Smiths inventory turnover will lead to increasing days in holding inventory. This would incur extra storage costs and other holding costs.

Prolonging creditors’ days

Below is the cash cycle chart:

Image

Apart from the increasing inventory days, WH Smiths creditors are having to wait longer for payment. However, this pattern is rather volatile and doesn’t appear to put investors off investing in Smiths.

Question: Is there any particular reasons why creditors’ days are longer?

The other dirty secret is WH Smiths assets.

A look at the depreciation of WH Smiths

WH Smiths rate of depreciation has slowed from 8.9% to 7%. A lower rate of depreciation indicates smaller depreciation charge. It helps to lower expenses and boost profits!

Another angle could be Smiths revaluing assets higher, as their original costs of assets rose from £460m to £539m, despite falling sales. In that case, you can ignore the depreciation charge.

Image

The average age of WH Smiths assets has gotten older by 3.2 years.

Lesson: - The older the asset gets over time, the greater the chance a company will spend big to refresh and maintain the condition of its assets.

For WH Smiths, this may not necessarily apply because they are focused on increasing its operating profits. However, the “bricks and mortar” coverage between their high-street branches and travel branches suggest otherwise (more on that later).

If you think WH Smiths is deliberately “lowering” depreciation charges, then there is an argument against that. One is to use the Worn-Out ratio, a measure of how much value has been written off.

Image

That ratio shows WH Smiths assets represent less than two-thirds of original value from half their original value, a decade ago.
However, it is evident the assets are getting older!

The Ugly Truth about WH Smiths

If you visit a WH Smiths store you may see this:

Image

Or, that

Image

I'm kidding!!!!!!! Now, the real ugly truth, which I’m ONLY hinting at, but shouldn’t be taken as gospel is the retail coverage.
We saw the big drop in sales of their high-street division from £1.1bn to £600m. When you compare that with “SQ. FT.” coverage, it tells a different story.

Image

The high-street division cover 2,827 (Sq. ft.’000s) today, not far from the 3,000 (Sq. ft.’000s) ten years ago, so how is it possible that sales declined so dramatically in that division?

Hmm… That’s a legit question.

We assumed from the start that Smiths been closing down its stores. In fact, the opposite has happened. There are now more stores on the high-street, as it jumped from 543 to 612. Or, it could mean that bigger branches are closing down, while it opens more little ones.

Based on the above assessment. Do you think there is foul play or a misunderstanding between crashing high-street sales and increasing stores?

WH Smiths Valuation

Smiths’ valuations are looking fairly high. Normally, it trades on single-digit of 6s and 7s for EV/EBIT. Now, it trades at 13 times operating earnings, which is doubled the average.

A similar comparison can be made for EV/OCF ratio, but the one difference is it normally trades at 5s and 6s multiples.

Image

So, is this valuation too high?

Well, analysts are forecasting £1.05 per share in earnings for 2017 and £1.09 per share for 2018. We can’t determine the absolute profits because of the company’s share buyback policies.

But, if “per share” increases are that small, despite further buybacks, then profits could be stagnating.

WH Smiths Briefing

Let’s remind us of the objectives in this post, that’s about identifying factors which support a retail stock price.

These are:
A. The growth in Smiths trading profits is a key factor, but it must translate to giving your shareholders a decent return.
B. Don’t sell a retail stock because of a declining revenue trend. Earnings should be your focus. Also, a mature business can attribute falling sales from over expansion, so it is natural for the company to implement economies of scale.
However, a growth retailer with falling sales would be bad.
C. Generating high levels of free cash flow is a positive sign and means the retailer didn’t have to borrow money to pay dividends. It is why WH Smiths debt levels are low.
D. And earning positive amounts of free cash flow gives management the options to increase dividends.

These are a few things you need to watch out for but is not everything. One big factor is the valuation. In the case of WH Smiths, it was a great buy when the company was trading on 6 times EV/EBIT. Now, at 13 times, the market got ahead of fundamentals.

A second factor is future earnings growth and for Smiths this it at a low single-digit (See WH Smiths Valuation). Add that to the high valuation and further share buyback, then fundamentals suggest it is running out of steam.

A third factor is the company’s business cycle. WH Smiths has been delivering for a long time, especially earnings growth. Now, it might be the time when consumers are cautious or picky in their spending.

As for forecasting WH Smith’s share price, I will leave that to the securities firms. If I was going a pick where the shares are going then there is a 60% chance it will trade £15 or under, but an 80% chance it will stay above £12.

Thanks for reading if you made it to the end!

Let’s me pick your brain some more and ask a few questions:
1. Do these factors support a mature retailer’s share price?
2. Do you think WH Smiths valuation looks too high? Therefore, may emulate NEXT PLC.


Disclosure

The opinions expressed by the writer is for entertainment and research purposes. It does not constitute professional investment advice. Data is correct on available information at the time.

Finally, the writer does not own the company’s stock, unless stated otherwise.

Clariman
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3271
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:17 am
Has thanked: 3087 times
Been thanked: 1559 times

Re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#57285

Postby Clariman » June 2nd, 2017, 11:09 am

I've just skim-read your detailed post, which clearly talks about the positives of the WH Smith business, with a few provisos from the investor's perspective. I'm more of a consumer than an investor but what I see from that perspective is an organisation that cares not a jot about a quality experience for its customers. It has very cleverly placed itself in near-monopoly positions at airports and rail stations where it has a captive market and little or no competition. On the High Street its stores are about 15 years overdue a make-over and are absolutely NOT a pleasant shopping experience.

WH Smith shops are miserable and dull with little in the way of customer service. They are unpleasant places to shop.

Just giving a different perspective. I have no particular axe to grind about WH Smith but I have felt the shopping experience in them decline and decline - to the point where I wouldn't shop in one if I didn't have to. That is something that I have often commented to my other half.

Clariman

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#57314

Postby dspp » June 2nd, 2017, 12:17 pm

WR,

That is a fascinating and thorough analysis, thank you.

I have watched the high street branches getting shabbier, and selling more tat (even more than they always did) and less decent stationery myself. It has reached the point where I personally buy my stationery in a local art/craft shop. However that does not make the business a bad investment and I have in parallel watched their push into travel sites, both rail & air. That has clearly been very successful and one also sees Boots etc doing the same. I noted Staples & Office Depot merger attempt (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-judg ... 58741.html) which was blocked due to antitrust concerns (did it go ahead in EU ?) and rather suspect that more and more high street stationers are being substituted online. So move sideways into selling food alongside magazines is sensible. By the way Menzies went a different route from bookstore to aviation (http://menziesaviation.com/about/#John-Menzies-plc).

The Boston Fried Chicken* effect may come in some time soon, i.e. site saturation and a share price nosedive. People have been saying that about Greggs for a long time but it never seems to come to pass. I do not have an answer for whether it will, but that is perhaps the crux of answering your two questions.

regards, dspp

* I thought this was a generally known case but I may be wrong. But basically store build out can go too far too fast, and reach constraints.

torata
Lemon Slice
Posts: 524
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 1:25 am
Has thanked: 207 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#57354

Postby torata » June 2nd, 2017, 3:31 pm

[quote="WalbrockResearch821"]
Moderator Message:
I have very slightly edited this to minimise any possibility that this is viewed as an advertisement. Please bear in mind that we have to tread a careful line in this respect. We are unsure of what is the exact line, but there is a '"sniff test" that it is preferable to not even need to deploy. Thank you for your understanding. regards, dspp


Reposted here on TLF with permission of the original copyright holder. All images links are charts I've created and helps to interpret the text.

Sorry DSPP,
the post per se fails my sniff test. But thank you for trying, and so quickly too.

torata

monabri
Lemon Half
Posts: 8426
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
Has thanked: 1549 times
Been thanked: 3443 times

Re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#105862

Postby monabri » December 23rd, 2017, 9:03 am

June 1st 2017
" As for forecasting WH Smith’s share price, I will leave that to the securities firms. If I was going a pick where the shares are going then there is a 60% chance it will trade £15 or under, but an 80% chance it will stay above £12 "

June 2 2017
Share price 1768p

22Dec 2017.
Share price 2268p.

Ummmm!

Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4654
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 903 times

Re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#107510

Postby Bouleversee » January 2nd, 2018, 8:41 pm

Like another poster, I have only skipped through the original post, which had a familiar ring to it. Is it a repeat/update? I have definitely seen those pictures of the dirty floor before. I rather lost interest when the writer started talking about the share buy backs reducing the investor's holdings. I bought my 850 shares on 28.1.11 and I still hold 850 shares. I see from my p/f valuation printout on Dec. 29 that the value has increased by 398.96% up to that date. No idea what the divs. amounted to but I think they were OK, certainly as a percentage of original purchase price. Do I care? Not really, with such an increase in value. Do I need to do all those calculations and estimates? I don't think so. There may be fewer shares in issue but how much that has affected the s.p. (it doesn't always make a lot of difference ) is difficult to quantify and doesn't greatly concern me.

As to the future, who knows? I agree that some of the stores are scruffy and unappealing but the writer says both High St.l and travel outlets achieved the same increase over 11 years, albeit High St. returns are significantly down of late, and seems to contradict himself as to whether retail is being cut back or expanded. Whereas fashion and decorating etc. are things one cuts back on when times are hard, the sort of stuff they sell in Smiths is more utilitarian and essential. If you run out of copy paper, pens and other stationery, it's a question of where not whether you buy it and in some places the options may be limited. So far as the travel division is concerned, I daresay those who can afford to travel can also afford to spend in the airport shops, though I have a vague recollection of some issue over VAT or tax which WHS had been caught by and might affect profits.

I'd like to think the management has the good sense to only keep stores in appropriate locations. In any event, if there is a bit of slippage on the s.p. I still couldn't complain and it is hard to find any better homes for my cash at the moment, added to which, according to sod's law, my WHS shares are not in an ISA or SIPP so gains would be potentially taxable so I might think about taking profits but will probably do nothing, as is my wont. And I won't be selling my Greggs either. I think equity investment is going to be even more of a lottery than usual in the next few years and maybe it's a case of better the devil you know...

It would be interesting to know what other holders plan to do.

What intrigues me about this lengthy post is why Wallbrook Research is asking us all these questions. It's answers we need, not questions.

ZipserSir
2 Lemon pips
Posts: 136
Joined: November 25th, 2016, 12:39 pm
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of WH Smiths

#120304

Postby ZipserSir » February 25th, 2018, 1:17 pm

Great post, WalbrockResearch821, and thank you for sharing it here!

I held WH Smith awhile back and could not work out why the shares were doing so well, apparently so contrary to the High Street. Your post has helped to explain that. I sold and made a good profit, but part of me wishes he'd stayed on for the ride - this has clearly been an extremely well run company and maybe that is something we don't often enough give credit for.


Return to “Stocks and Share Dealing Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests