dspp wrote:Until its not gradual at all,
What does annual temperatures mean?
7.6 to 10.8 means nothing to me I'm afraid, other than one is higher than the other, and the trend.
Thanks to ExFM,ErroneousBee,GSVsowhat,Shelford,Hypster, for Donating to support the site
dspp wrote:Until its not gradual at all,
feder1 wrote:What is the 90 day rule please?
feder1 wrote:What is the 90 day rule please?
JohnB wrote:The Front Range in Colorado has an excellent climate, always sunny, never humid, but even 10 years ago the weeks of 100 degree temperatures were wearing, and my friends there say is becoming more like Arizona. The Boulder/Denver has great scenery, climate and culture, but I still wanted to come back to Britain for my friends, so retirement to me depends on my social networks,
Snorvey wrote:You'll also have to have more than 6 months left on your passport (I think it's currently 3 months for travelling to the EU)
As I understand it, several EU countries are planning long term residency options for UK citizens (Portugal, Malta, Cyprus etc). But as mentioned, only for that country.
Snorvey wrote:I'd like to live in the US, but it's just so damned difficult to get to live there long term.
There's always the option of the 90 day Visa and then just deciding to stay (i.e. illegally). If you have the assets to live off, don't suffer any medical mishaps and always drive under the speed limit you could probably live there for years. Decades even. In fact i read about an Irish guy, that had overstayed his Visa, set up a business (in the Boston area I think), got married and had 3 kids and they still deported him when the authorities caught up with him 20 odd years later.
Lootman wrote:San Francisco has a near perfect climate where you barely need either AC or heating. But housing costs are similar to London.
feder1 wrote:What is the 90 day rule please?
Lootman wrote:Portugal also has favourable tax terms for new British expats. From memory you get a 10 year "holiday" from Portuguese taxes. Assuming you lose your UK tax liability you could park your assets in Gibraltar or Jersey and pay no tax anywhere, if I understand it correctly.
Malta and Cyprus too possibly but I don't know anything about them.
Dod101 wrote:Lootman wrote:San Francisco has a near perfect climate where you barely need either AC or heating. But housing costs are similar to London.
I agree on the climate but two things. I was once stopped by the police when out walking on a Sunday morning in a quiet neighbourhood. They could not understand why I would walk.
The other thing is the threat of a earthquake.
Dod
Mike88 wrote:Dod101 wrote:Lootman wrote:San Francisco has a near perfect climate where you barely need either AC or heating. But housing costs are similar to London.
I agree on the climate but two things. I was once stopped by the police when out walking on a Sunday morning in a quiet neighbourhood. They could not understand why I would walk.
The other thing is the threat of a earthquake.
Another freezing place. Mark Twain is attributed as saying "The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco".
BrummieDave wrote:Haven't we already effectively done this thread before, albeit under the guise of "If you could live anywhere in the world, where would it be?" https://lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=21865
I think I weighed in with Wanaka (NZ), or Sonoma CA (USA), Sedona AZ (USA), Santa Barbara CA (USA). I am still hoping to visit St George UT (USA) in September, a town growing in popularity with retirees, but who knows if that will happen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests