Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Woodford to return.

Closed-end funds and OEICs
Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7535 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#386991

Postby Dod101 » February 15th, 2021, 4:40 pm

richfool wrote:Surely the root cause of the Woodford problems were that he had invested too much into the illiquid "off-piste" holdings, in contravention of the rules of the fund/trust. Then when withdrawals increased and those proportions worsened, the Directors were obliged to act.


Yes but don't confuse an open ended OEIC with an investment trust (which will never have the same liquidity problems) The Trust got into difficulty mainly as regards its internal performance when Woodford off loaded unlisted investments into it from his OEIC, coupled with having a totally ineffective Board of Directors because they appeared to be uncritically on his side.

Dod

monabri
Lemon Half
Posts: 8421
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 3441 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387014

Postby monabri » February 15th, 2021, 5:25 pm

SoBo65 wrote:I see both AsleepInYorkshire and ReallyVeryFoolish are quoted in the times today:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/save ... 184454_101



I wonder if the economic editor at The Times is a Lemon? ;)

G37y
Lemon Pip
Posts: 69
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387040

Postby G37y » February 15th, 2021, 7:03 pm

A good bit of background infomation of what actually went wrong can be found here.
https://www.piworld.co.uk/2019/11/22/wh ... d-history/
I thought it was worth watching anyway

Adamski
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1102
Joined: July 13th, 2020, 1:39 pm
Has thanked: 1484 times
Been thanked: 567 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387075

Postby Adamski » February 15th, 2021, 9:11 pm

Quoted in the Times, love it!! Wouldn't surprise me if this forum is a common source of ideas across the personal finance press without direct quotation, as we're one of only a few personal investing forums, and an active one with experienced and knowledgeable posters.

fisher
Lemon Slice
Posts: 387
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 351 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387101

Postby fisher » February 15th, 2021, 10:50 pm

G37y wrote:A good bit of background infomation of what actually went wrong can be found here.
https://www.piworld.co.uk/2019/11/22/wh ... d-history/
I thought it was worth watching anyway


I enjoyed watching this - thanks.

AsleepInYorkshire
Lemon Half
Posts: 7383
Joined: February 7th, 2017, 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 10514 times
Been thanked: 4659 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387102

Postby AsleepInYorkshire » February 15th, 2021, 10:56 pm

Adamski wrote:Quoted in the Times, love it!! Wouldn't surprise me if this forum is a common source of ideas across the personal finance press without direct quotation, as we're one of only a few personal investing forums, and an active one with experienced and knowledgeable posters.

Which is why I ask why on earth did they quote me :lol: You could write my financial knowledge on the back of a stamp with a paint brush

AiY

csearle
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4829
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 4855 times
Been thanked: 2118 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387137

Postby csearle » February 16th, 2021, 7:48 am

AsleepInYorkshire wrote:I wasn't in Woodford, thank goodness. However, my "justice gene" runs deep and I find the behaviour of some irks. Mr Woodford could scale down his own personal wealth, buy a preowned van and lawnmower and offer to cut the lawns of those who have lost money due to his actions.
You tarting for another quotation? ;) C.

AsleepInYorkshire
Lemon Half
Posts: 7383
Joined: February 7th, 2017, 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 10514 times
Been thanked: 4659 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387138

Postby AsleepInYorkshire » February 16th, 2021, 7:50 am

csearle wrote:
AsleepInYorkshire wrote:I wasn't in Woodford, thank goodness. However, my "justice gene" runs deep and I find the behaviour of some irks. Mr Woodford could scale down his own personal wealth, buy a preowned van and lawnmower and offer to cut the lawns of those who have lost money due to his actions.
You tarting for another quotation? ;) C.

I'm always tarting :lol:

AiY

csearle
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4829
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 4855 times
Been thanked: 2118 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387139

Postby csearle » February 16th, 2021, 8:08 am

Matchless wrote:His mistake was timing - he started on his own at the wrong time, and because of this he was forced to make the investments he did, and events went against him, but how many investment / platform managers can we mugs really trust to get it right for us, I would suggest a lot have no more interest in our money than he had.
This of course was(/is?) the central tenet of The Motley Fool, our Herkunft, which sought to empower the private investor to take control of his/her own finances, not least because of the potential conflict of interest with organisations investing on our behalf.

Chris

nmdhqbc
Lemon Slice
Posts: 634
Joined: March 22nd, 2017, 10:17 am
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387347

Postby nmdhqbc » February 17th, 2021, 7:38 am

Not sure if this should be a separate thread but does anyone know much about these litigation cases? Whether they are advisable to join? The charges seem high at "35% of your damages, plus VAT" but what other way is there to get back as much of the losses as possible?

https://woodfordclaim.com

richfool
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3520
Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
Has thanked: 1204 times
Been thanked: 1288 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387448

Postby richfool » February 17th, 2021, 12:31 pm

The return of Woodford isn't going away quietly and rightly so. Gina Miller has now added her opinion!
Gina Miller, a fund manager and co-founder of the True and Fair Campaign who shot to fame for her Brexit Supreme Court case, said Woodford's plans made a "mockery" of UK regulation and were an "insult" to investors who backed his last venture.

"Too often the perpetrators of financial wrongdoing seem to slip off the hook, many to start up new lucrative operations while it is ordinary savers who suffer the brunt of this wrongdoing," Miller and her husband Alan wrote in a letter sent to the Treasury Select Committee on Wednesday.

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/neil- ... 11804.html

Matchless
Posts: 48
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:08 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387451

Postby Matchless » February 17th, 2021, 12:45 pm

The Millers seem to seek fame, any way they can get it for whatever reason - I will choose to ignore anything they say about anything.

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7535 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387465

Postby Dod101 » February 17th, 2021, 1:28 pm

Matchless wrote:The Millers seem to seek fame, any way they can get it for whatever reason - I will choose to ignore anything they say about anything.


I cannot say I find her a very pleasant character. I do not know anything about the other half but in fact, from the report I read this morning they are absolutely right in this case and it seems to be pertain to their line of business, so I say good luck to them.

Dod

PinkDalek
Lemon Half
Posts: 6139
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
Has thanked: 1589 times
Been thanked: 1801 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387496

Postby PinkDalek » February 17th, 2021, 4:00 pm

The FCA's statement, originally published 16 February 2021, is here:

Statement by Mark Steward, FCA Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, on Woodford Investment Management Ltd and WCM Partners Ltd
https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/statement-mark-steward-fca-director-enforcement-market-oversight-woodford-investment-management

Pipsmum
Lemon Slice
Posts: 325
Joined: April 12th, 2017, 11:18 pm
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387541

Postby Pipsmum » February 17th, 2021, 6:38 pm

He's been scolded here but it doesn't help all those with burned funds and smouldering resentments.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/20 ... regulator/

Matchless
Posts: 48
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:08 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387560

Postby Matchless » February 17th, 2021, 7:55 pm

Some of us got very badly burned by the Scottish banks and many other investment mistakes we/they made, and perhaps some of those involved have gone on to try to make a go of other stuff without the mob screaming for vengeance - no one forces us to invest in anything.

Leif
Lemon Pip
Posts: 62
Joined: February 6th, 2021, 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387588

Postby Leif » February 17th, 2021, 10:24 pm

Dod101 wrote:
Matchless wrote:The Millers seem to seek fame, any way they can get it for whatever reason - I will choose to ignore anything they say about anything.


I cannot say I find her a very pleasant character. I do not know anything about the other half but in fact, from the report I read this morning they are absolutely right in this case and it seems to be pertain to their line of business, so I say good luck to them.

Dod


She is a rather self indulgent individual. I found it difficult to listen to her narcissistic emoting during the Brexit saga.

As regards Woodford, it seems to me that an awful lot of people praised him when all was hunky dory, only to turn on him when it went south. The finance industry is full of villains. You only have to look at some company pension funds that are woeful, albeit efficient fee generators. Lots of equity funds close down each year, having failed to achieve the lofty claims in marketing bumf. A cynic might think the managers knew they would be dogs, and cared only about trousering a nice wodge, before moving on to the next heavily marketed adventure.

The question to be asked is did he do anything illegal, or knowingly break industry regulations governing fund management.

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7535 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387613

Postby Dod101 » February 18th, 2021, 6:34 am

Thanks Leif

I tend to be unmoved by the likes of Woodford and have never bought in to any of his funds so am not involved. He certainly stretched the meaning of 'unlisted' when trying to reduce his exposure to unlisted investments but he would not as you say, be the first to do that sort of thing.

I am no great investor and I long ago came to the conclusion that I can lose money just as well as the next man and do not need to pay an adviser to do that for me. It will be interesting to see if the FCA can pin anything on him. True to form, probably not in the end.

Dod

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7535 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387671

Postby Dod101 » February 18th, 2021, 10:53 am

The Times this morning reports that the Jersey regulator is 'disappointed' that Woodford had announced he was starting a new business in Jersey without having first sought its authorisation. He did not even acknowledge that his plans were subject to regulatory approval.

Terry Smith has quite predictably waded in as well, questioning the apology Woodford has made to his erstwhile investors.



Dod

toofast2live
Lemon Slice
Posts: 494
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Woodford to return.

#387697

Postby toofast2live » February 18th, 2021, 12:04 pm

C’mon guys. Mistakes happen. Look at Andy “boy wonder” Hornby who “headed” up HBOS in 2008. Allegedly didn’t understand his ar*se from his elbow as far as banking was concerned. Now an expert chairman of a restaurant group!

These big guys lack humility, talent and skill. But boy, self confidence and hubris floats a damn big boat!


Return to “Investment Trusts and Unit Trusts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests