Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Lyxor

Index tracking funds and ETFs
GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4745
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1372 times

Lyxor

#135350

Postby GeoffF100 » April 28th, 2018, 3:45 pm

Here is a good article on Lyxor ETFs on Monevator:

http://monevator.com/lyxor-core-etfs-ve ... -wrinkles/

hiriskpaul
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3883
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
Has thanked: 694 times
Been thanked: 1519 times

Re: Lyxor

#135558

Postby hiriskpaul » April 29th, 2018, 5:49 pm

Very interesting, especially the bit about the 30% withholding tax on US shares paid by the US ETF. Cannot understand why Lyxor domicile the ETF in Luxembourg. As one of the comments points out, the uncompetitive tax treaty with the US rules out the ETF for consideration when compared to Irish domiciled ETFs from Vanguard, iShares, HSBC, etc.

Good to see competition bringing down the fees.

GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4745
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1372 times

Re: Lyxor

#135691

Postby GeoffF100 » April 30th, 2018, 10:25 am

hiriskpaul wrote:Very interesting, especially the bit about the 30% withholding tax on US shares paid by the US ETF. Cannot understand why Lyxor domicile the ETF in Luxembourg. As one of the comments points out, the uncompetitive tax treaty with the US rules out the ETF for consideration when compared to Irish domiciled ETFs from Vanguard, iShares, HSBC, etc.

It would be strange if Luxembourgers could side step the extra withholding tax that they would pay on direct US investment by buying an Irish domiciled ETF. Perhaps their tax treaty with the US prevents them from doing this, hence the need for a Luxembourg domiciled fund. The strange composition of the "UK" tracker is harder to understand.

colin
Lemon Slice
Posts: 663
Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Re: Lyxor

#135973

Postby colin » May 1st, 2018, 11:00 am

Interesting link, I do find Monevator the most easily read of all the financial sites , being entertained and amused while learning about this stuff does , like a spoon full of sugar, help the medicine go down.

hiriskpaul
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3883
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
Has thanked: 694 times
Been thanked: 1519 times

Re: Lyxor

#136012

Postby hiriskpaul » May 1st, 2018, 1:15 pm

As the management fees come down, the fees charged by index providers become more significant. The only reason I can think of for Lyxor to follow the obscure Morningstar UK index is that Morningstar charge less than FTSE Russell.

OhNoNotimAgain
Lemon Slice
Posts: 767
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:51 am
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 147 times

Re: Lyxor

#136037

Postby OhNoNotimAgain » May 1st, 2018, 2:21 pm

As usual the cost of the spread is ignored when talking about ETFs.

GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4745
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1372 times

Re: Lyxor

#136154

Postby GeoffF100 » May 2nd, 2018, 7:46 am

The spread is not a significant cost for many people. OEICs and ETFs have their pros and cons, but that is not the subject of this thread.

colin
Lemon Slice
Posts: 663
Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Re: Lyxor

#136233

Postby colin » May 2nd, 2018, 10:55 am

OEICs and ETFs have their pros and cons, but that is not the subject of this thread.

The subject of this thread is an article comparing the pros and cons of lyxor ETFs to the ETfs of other providers,in my opinion differences in bid offer spreads are absolutely relevant.

OhNoNotimAgain
Lemon Slice
Posts: 767
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:51 am
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 147 times

Re: Lyxor

#136250

Postby OhNoNotimAgain » May 2nd, 2018, 11:25 am

colin wrote:
OEICs and ETFs have their pros and cons, but that is not the subject of this thread.

The subject of this thread is an article comparing the pros and cons of lyxor ETFs to the ETfs of other providers,in my opinion differences in bid offer spreads are absolutely relevant.


The thread is about costs of ETFs and it doesn't suit the providers of them to talk about spreads. Journalists don't understand it either so they don't pick it up but spread is a crucial part of the costs in the same way that a dilution levy can be for an OEIC.

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8267
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4130 times

Re: Lyxor

#136271

Postby tjh290633 » May 2nd, 2018, 12:02 pm

Looking at IUKD just now, it is 911.9 buy, 910.2 sell, a spread of 1.7p. I make that about 0.2%. From the fact sheet, the TER is 0.4%. The yield is 5.23% according to HL.co.uk.

TJH

hiriskpaul
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3883
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
Has thanked: 694 times
Been thanked: 1519 times

Re: Lyxor

#136307

Postby hiriskpaul » May 2nd, 2018, 1:05 pm

According to Hargreaves Lansdown the spread on MEUD (Lyxor EuroStoxx 600 ETF) is 0.17%. That compares with 0.01% for the similar broad European ETF from Vanguard (VEUR). So certainly something to be aware of, especially if expected holding time is likely to be short.

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7883
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3042 times

Re: Lyxor

#136315

Postby mc2fool » May 2nd, 2018, 1:32 pm

hiriskpaul wrote:According to Hargreaves Lansdown the spread on MEUD (Lyxor EuroStoxx 600 ETF) is 0.17%. That compares with 0.01% for the similar broad European ETF from Vanguard (VEUR). So certainly something to be aware of, especially if expected holding time is likely to be short.

??? At time of writing:

MEUD Sell: 13,246.00p Buy: 13,262.00p http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-searc ... rope-c-eur
VEUR Sell: £27.10 Buy: £27.13 http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-searc ... ped-europe

I make those spreads 0.12% and 0.11% respectively.

hiriskpaul
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3883
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
Has thanked: 694 times
Been thanked: 1519 times

Re: Lyxor

#136316

Postby hiriskpaul » May 2nd, 2018, 1:41 pm

mc2fool wrote:
hiriskpaul wrote:According to Hargreaves Lansdown the spread on MEUD (Lyxor EuroStoxx 600 ETF) is 0.17%. That compares with 0.01% for the similar broad European ETF from Vanguard (VEUR). So certainly something to be aware of, especially if expected holding time is likely to be short.

??? At time of writing:

MEUD Sell: 13,246.00p Buy: 13,262.00p http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-searc ... rope-c-eur
VEUR Sell: £27.10 Buy: £27.13 http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-searc ... ped-europe

I make those spreads 0.12% and 0.11% respectively.

Whoops, quite right, I added an extra zero! iShares IMEU has a lower spread of about 0.05%. Much higher management charge though at 0.35%.

hiriskpaul
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3883
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
Has thanked: 694 times
Been thanked: 1519 times

Re: Lyxor

#136321

Postby hiriskpaul » May 2nd, 2018, 1:53 pm

By the way, Some of HSBC's tracker OEICs are very competitively priced now and we'll worth a look. For example the C class European index fund, which excludes UK, has a management charge of only 0.07% and no bid/ask spread (supposedly). You would of course need to be wary of any percentage platform charges with OEICS.

OhNoNotimAgain
Lemon Slice
Posts: 767
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:51 am
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 147 times

Re: Lyxor

#136344

Postby OhNoNotimAgain » May 2nd, 2018, 2:51 pm

I doubt the data is available but a time series of spreads during periods of market stress would be illuminataing.

Certainly, some intermediaries are not keen on ETFs because liquidity can evaporate just when it is needed.

colin
Lemon Slice
Posts: 663
Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Re: Lyxor

#136399

Postby colin » May 2nd, 2018, 5:31 pm

The thread is about costs of ETFs

No it's not . The subject of the thread is the article linked to in the first post.

GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4745
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1372 times

Re: Lyxor

#136412

Postby GeoffF100 » May 2nd, 2018, 6:23 pm

OhNoNotimAgain wrote:I doubt the data is available but a time series of spreads during periods of market stress would be illuminataing.

Certainly, some intermediaries are not keen on ETFs because liquidity can evaporate just when it is needed.

I do not believe that it is sensible to trade ETFs at times of market stress, particularly if they have assets that are not very liquid. I also do not believe that selling because the market has taken a tumble is sensible either. I always do lots of price checking before trading ETFs, having had my fingers burned once on SLXX. I do not particularly like ETFs, but there is not always a reasonable alternative.

In my experience, spreads for Vanguard ETFs are usually about 0.1%, which is about the same as for blue chip shares. I looked at the spreads for the Lyxor gilt funds, and they were not significantly different. The spread will not be a significant cost for most long term holders, but it is not negligible on large sums.

GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4745
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1372 times

Re: Lyxor

#136460

Postby GeoffF100 » May 2nd, 2018, 9:58 pm

hiriskpaul wrote:iShares IMEU has a lower spread of about 0.05%. Much higher management charge though at 0.35%.

Now showing 0.07%. The spreads fluctuate all the time, and you usually get a price within the spread. I doubt whether there is much if any consistent difference between the spreads of the more liquid ETFs.

colin
Lemon Slice
Posts: 663
Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Re: Lyxor

#136519

Postby colin » May 3rd, 2018, 10:05 am

I do not believe that it is sensible to trade ETFs at times of market stress, particularly if they have assets that are not very liquid.

Wide bid offer spreads during market crises favor buyers at the expense of sellers, I like others who used TMF site were able to buy corporate bonds through Barclays ishares etf SLXX during the most dramatic period of the financial crisis, a diversified portfolio of investment grade bonds for a short time yielded 9%!! No market maker would trade the underlying bonds but they could still be bought through the ETF.

GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4745
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1372 times

Re: Lyxor

#136733

Postby GeoffF100 » May 4th, 2018, 7:39 am

colin wrote:
I do not believe that it is sensible to trade ETFs at times of market stress, particularly if they have assets that are not very liquid.

Wide bid offer spreads during market crises favor buyers at the expense of sellers, I like others who used TMF site were able to buy corporate bonds through Barclays ishares etf SLXX during the most dramatic period of the financial crisis, a diversified portfolio of investment grade bonds for a short time yielded 9%!! No market maker would trade the underlying bonds but they could still be bought through the ETF.

Wide spreads with the mid price unchanged disadvantage both buyers and sellers. Market makers can increase spreads because of market volatility. The Lyxor 0-5 year gilt ETF GIL5 appears to have lower spread than most ETFs, which I expect is a result of its low volatility:

http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-searc ... actuaries2

ETFs can trade at large discounts or premiums to NAV:

http://www.etf.com/sections/features-an ... nopaging=1

A large discount to NAV can outweigh the effect of a wide spread. Aside from the spread and discount/premium, there is also the issue of price spikes:

https://www.barrons.com/articles/sudden ... 1419360316

You can find the NAV the previous day for ETFs, e.g.:

https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/inve ... _fund_link

It is important to check this against the price quoted to buy or sell.

Buyer and seller beware!


Return to “Passive Investing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests