Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site
Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18938
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 6677 times
Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
I've noticed a few people suggesting here recently the Vanguard All-World ETF, ticker VWRL, as a default choice for investment. It is probably the broadest equity investment available for UK investors, neutrally investing across the globe in large, medium and smaller issues. 3,000 or so holdings across 50 or so countries.
It's a decent idea. But what I wanted to focus upon here is the fund cost. Not that it is expensive. Like most Vanguard products it is keenly priced at 0.25% a year. But when you compare it to the costs of Vanguard's regional ETFs it seems oddly costly.
For example, only the Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF has an expense ratio that high, and that is only 10%-15% of the fund. Other regions can be had via Vanguard ETFs as follows:
UK 0.06%
US 0.07%
Europe ex-UK 0.12%
Japan 0.19%
Developed Asia ex-Japan 0.22%
So it is clear that a DIY All-World portfolio using Vanguard's regional ETFs can be had at a lower price. The snag is that you'd have to buy the component parts in proportion to the regional market cap to achieve the same goal. The good news is that they should self-adjust after initial purchase. That in turn requires a knowledge of the market cap percentages of different regions, which can be seen from the VWRL factsheet. Rounding a bit we have:
US 53%
Europe ex-UK 16%
Japan 8%
UK 6%
Emerging 6%
Asia ex-Japan 5%
and the rest are either frontier markets or markets that fall between the cracks e.g. Canada and Australia.
Whether it's worth the extra work to build it this way to save a few basis points of expenses is an individual decision. But some may deem it worthwhile, whilst others might want to "tweak" the weightings anyway.
It's a decent idea. But what I wanted to focus upon here is the fund cost. Not that it is expensive. Like most Vanguard products it is keenly priced at 0.25% a year. But when you compare it to the costs of Vanguard's regional ETFs it seems oddly costly.
For example, only the Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF has an expense ratio that high, and that is only 10%-15% of the fund. Other regions can be had via Vanguard ETFs as follows:
UK 0.06%
US 0.07%
Europe ex-UK 0.12%
Japan 0.19%
Developed Asia ex-Japan 0.22%
So it is clear that a DIY All-World portfolio using Vanguard's regional ETFs can be had at a lower price. The snag is that you'd have to buy the component parts in proportion to the regional market cap to achieve the same goal. The good news is that they should self-adjust after initial purchase. That in turn requires a knowledge of the market cap percentages of different regions, which can be seen from the VWRL factsheet. Rounding a bit we have:
US 53%
Europe ex-UK 16%
Japan 8%
UK 6%
Emerging 6%
Asia ex-Japan 5%
and the rest are either frontier markets or markets that fall between the cracks e.g. Canada and Australia.
Whether it's worth the extra work to build it this way to save a few basis points of expenses is an individual decision. But some may deem it worthwhile, whilst others might want to "tweak" the weightings anyway.
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
I have noticed this fact as I simplified my Portfolio.
I have a Portfolio of 3 funds only-all Vanguard -World ex UK,UK and Global Bond
As I get older,thinking of my wife handling the ISAs and SIPPS - your observations were became more obvious
I fancied VWRL plus a Bond Fund or a one fund solution-a Life Strategy Fund(too much UK bias)
They however are more expensive than my current setup
I might still go that route as I get older-now 72- it would make life a lot simpler for my heirs who have no interest in running Money
There currently is a price to pay for simplification!
Hopefully this may change
xxd09
I have a Portfolio of 3 funds only-all Vanguard -World ex UK,UK and Global Bond
As I get older,thinking of my wife handling the ISAs and SIPPS - your observations were became more obvious
I fancied VWRL plus a Bond Fund or a one fund solution-a Life Strategy Fund(too much UK bias)
They however are more expensive than my current setup
I might still go that route as I get older-now 72- it would make life a lot simpler for my heirs who have no interest in running Money
There currently is a price to pay for simplification!
Hopefully this may change
xxd09
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4760
- Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
- Has thanked: 178 times
- Been thanked: 1377 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
A compromise is to use just VEVE and (about 10%) VFEM. That saves some of the cost.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5884
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
- Has thanked: 5825 times
- Been thanked: 2127 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
Well said.
I think that Hariseldon58 has previously identified the same thing, and structured his use of Vanguard funds to take advantage of this 'feature' for the reason you set out.
Borrowing slightly I do the same thing, but for simplicity I include VWRL in my four-fund mix (VWRL, VERX, VUKE, VAPX). I take the view that the fewer moving parts, the easier I can keep an eye on what does matter to me. The slight additional cost is worth it to me.
regards, dspp
I think that Hariseldon58 has previously identified the same thing, and structured his use of Vanguard funds to take advantage of this 'feature' for the reason you set out.
Borrowing slightly I do the same thing, but for simplicity I include VWRL in my four-fund mix (VWRL, VERX, VUKE, VAPX). I take the view that the fewer moving parts, the easier I can keep an eye on what does matter to me. The slight additional cost is worth it to me.
regards, dspp
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 1339 times
- Been thanked: 607 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
As part of my passive strategy I hold VEVE (Developed World), VFEM (Emerging Markets) and VVAL (Global Value Factor).
Cheers, OLTB.
Cheers, OLTB.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
- Has thanked: 1208 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
I can see the merit in gaining low cost exposure to these various markets, via an ETF., but who decides what stocks the ETF includes and excludes? Particularly when it comes to funds that target Value or Higher Yielding stocks, there must be a degree of selection, which surely then brings us back to it being a case of active management.
I can see the point if a fund is tracking the FTSE100 or a specific index, but targetting value or high yield must surely involve some degree of selection.
I can see the point if a fund is tracking the FTSE100 or a specific index, but targetting value or high yield must surely involve some degree of selection.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 663
- Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
richfool wrote:
I can see the point if a fund is tracking the FTSE100 or a specific index, but targetting value or high yield must surely involve some degree of selection.
no because the FOOTSIE company or whoever will create any index they can sell and fund managers pay to use the appropriate index which they then track according to index rules. All that is required is an algorithm to follow which makes the selections according to pre set rules. Sometimes no doubt, as with the all share ,it may be un- economical to buy each company in which case no body is going to make any value judgement on which companies to exclude rather the algorithm will be tweaked to narrow the selection or maybe they just make a random selection from among the permitted companies .
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
- Has thanked: 1208 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
colin wrote:richfool wrote:
I can see the point if a fund is tracking the FTSE100 or a specific index, but targetting value or high yield must surely involve some degree of selection.
no because the FOOTSIE company or whoever will create any index they can sell and fund managers pay to use the appropriate index which they then track according to index rules. All that is required is an algorithm to follow which makes the selections according to pre set rules. Sometimes no doubt, as with the all share ,it may be un- economical to buy each company in which case no body is going to make any value judgement on which companies to exclude rather the algorithm will be tweaked to narrow the selection or maybe they just make a random selection from among the permitted companies .
Thanks for that Colin.
So are you saying that the "selection" is tweaked/varied, presumably at (predetermined) intervals to ensure it is tracking the most appropriate stocks, or is it the index that is tweaked? Though I appreciate that the FTSE 100 index does add and remove stocks according to their size.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5884
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
- Has thanked: 5825 times
- Been thanked: 2127 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
Sometimes it is a purely mechanical algorithm, sometimes it is largely or partly human-driven within defined criteria.
An example of the latter would be VWEHX https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... file/VWEHX which is actually outsourced for selection purposes (to Wellington), presumably as there is not a suitable existing index (or it is cheaper for Vanguard to use Wellington to create an index than to buy it in).
regards, dspp
An example of the latter would be VWEHX https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-fu ... file/VWEHX which is actually outsourced for selection purposes (to Wellington), presumably as there is not a suitable existing index (or it is cheaper for Vanguard to use Wellington to create an index than to buy it in).
regards, dspp
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8289
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 919 times
- Been thanked: 4138 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
richfool wrote:So are you saying that the "selection" is tweaked/varied, presumably at (predetermined) intervals to ensure it is tracking the most appropriate stocks, or is it the index that is tweaked? Though I appreciate that the FTSE 100 index does add and remove stocks according to their size.
If you look at the rules for the various manufactured indices, such as https://www.ftse.com/Analytics/Factshee ... 7d40cd.pdf for the FTSE Dividend+ Index, you will see that it is reviewed twice a year. The details are in the blue panel to the right.
TJH
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 663
- Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
richfool wrote:colin wrote:richfool wrote:
So are you saying that the "selection" is tweaked/varied, presumably at (predetermined) intervals to ensure it is tracking the most appropriate stocks, or is it the index that is tweaked? Though I appreciate that the FTSE 100 index does add and remove stocks according to their size.
The FTSE all share index for example is an aggregation of the FTSE 100 FTSE 250 and FTSE small cap indices, the last one includes several hundred companies far more than the other two combined yet their total market cap is only about 6% of the entire index so it's not worth an index fund which follows the all share buying every company in the small cap index. Whether that selection is made randomly or a set of rules are employed to whittle the number down I have no idea, i suppose it varies from fund to fund, whereas ishares uk dividend + fund, IUKD follows an index with only 50 companies so it can fully replicate the index. If you look at the details published by index fund providers it will tell you somewhere whether the fund employs full replication of the index or not and if not which method is used.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 837
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
- Has thanked: 124 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
Regarding full replication or not, Vanguard has a Global Smaller Co's Index as a fund and it has pretty much full replication with 4,000+ holdings, State Street has an ETF tracking the same index with partial replication. I have watched the State Street ETF for some time and the number of holdings has crept up over the years from around 1,000 to 3,000+, when compared on a like for like basis, total return and the same currency, the performance is pretty much identical which suggests that the partial replication is pretty effective.
If I might comment, the Vanguard Global Value ETF is run by an algorithm, which Vanguard can tweak as they wish, thus it is a very low cost active ETF, whilst the Vanguard Global Hi Yield ETF is a yield based index, as I recollect is based on the top 50% of yield of the Global index and then weighted by market cap.
If I might comment, the Vanguard Global Value ETF is run by an algorithm, which Vanguard can tweak as they wish, thus it is a very low cost active ETF, whilst the Vanguard Global Hi Yield ETF is a yield based index, as I recollect is based on the top 50% of yield of the Global index and then weighted by market cap.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18938
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 6677 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
GeoffF100 wrote:A compromise is to use just VEVE and (about 10%) VFEM. That saves some of the cost.
Yeah, but even so VEVE is about 70% invested in the US and the UK, and those regions can be had for 0.06%/0.07% via VUSA and VUKE. It would irk me paying 0.18% via VEVE for that exposure.
Maybe VWRL should have been structured as a "shell" ETF that invests in the regional sub-funds. That way its cost would be the weighted average of the underlying sub-funds, which would be something like half of the 0.25% that VWRL costs.
In that context it is interesting to look at Vanguard's US-traded equivalent, ticker VT. Identical for all practical purposes to VWRL, it's annual cost is 0.1%.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 705 times
- Been thanked: 1558 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
VWRL is expensive compared to the sum of the parts, and I have never really understood the justification for this and other world funds having the fees they do. Holding individual regional ETFs is fine, but usually means missing out on Canadian shares, worth around 2.7% of the FTSE World index. For completeness I add Canadian shares in via an expensive iShares ETF. Over the last 5 years though that has barely been worth it and would have lost me money if it had not been for the depreciation of the pound. The FTSE 100 has actually performed even worse, but again this is masked by the drop in the pound.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 578
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:57 pm
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 299 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
hiriskpaul wrote:VWRL is expensive compared to the sum of the parts, and I have never really understood the justification for this ...
Me neither. I built up my VWRL equivalent some years ago from HSBC's class C OEICs. These currently cost 0.06% for the UK and US, 0.07% for Europe and a whopping(!) 0.21% and 0.24% for Japan and Pacific ex-Japan respectively.
Admittedly I've left out niche items like Canada, and get my Emerging Markets fix elsewhere, but overall it's a pretty nicely globally diversified portfolio nevertheless. Its weighted cost is a truly skimpy 0.08%, and that even beats Vanguard US's VT. Held on iWeb, so no nasty percentage-based fees either.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5884
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
- Has thanked: 5825 times
- Been thanked: 2127 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
Are the stray VWRL bits outside of mainstream indices overly costly for Vanguard to maintain ?
I'm asking because Vanguard usually have a valid reason for their charge structure, and there does (otherwise) seem to be an issue here.
regards, dspp
I'm asking because Vanguard usually have a valid reason for their charge structure, and there does (otherwise) seem to be an issue here.
regards, dspp
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
- Has thanked: 1208 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
So would VEVE plus a small holding of VAPX give a reasonable combined exposure, at a reduced/minimal cost, to the Developed World, plus Asia Pacific?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1809
- Joined: November 13th, 2016, 3:41 pm
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 652 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
I was happy with 0.21% for VWRL until I saw the post above citing 0.06% for VUSA (actually 0.7% per the Vanguard website just now)!
It has made me re-evaluate my approach. I already have plenty of UK exposure through my HYP. Developed Far East ex-Japan is covered by an existing holding in VAPX. I also have some Asia / International ITs, so really just need the USA component of VUSA rather than VWRL. Not concerned about China, emerging markets or Europe.
It has made me re-evaluate my approach. I already have plenty of UK exposure through my HYP. Developed Far East ex-Japan is covered by an existing holding in VAPX. I also have some Asia / International ITs, so really just need the USA component of VUSA rather than VWRL. Not concerned about China, emerging markets or Europe.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18938
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 6677 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
bluedonkey wrote:I was happy with 0.21% for VWRL until I saw the post above citing 0.06% for VUSA (actually 0.7% per the Vanguard website just now)!
The source I used showed the annual expense for VWRL as 0.25%, not 0.21%. Perhaps you are looking at the OEIC and not the ETF?
https://global.vanguard.com/portal/site ... docId=1011
I think you meant 0.07% for VUSA. VUKE is 0.06%. I might have mixed those two up earlier, not that it makes a lot of difference.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 837
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
- Has thanked: 124 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
Re: Vanguard VWRL - the one stop solution?
There are good behavioural reasons for holding VWRL, it takes away the chance to tinker ! I have maintained holdings which are effectively VWRL "deconstructed" with a little personal bias, bit more VAPX, bit less VJPN, bit more VUKE and some VMID etc.
The saving is around 10 or 12 basis points (around £1,000) on a million pound holding. On the face of it a good saving but I lose Canada and perhaps my subtle weighting differences are a mistake ?
Perhaps we over think it and the cost saving is offset by our tinkering ?
The saving is around 10 or 12 basis points (around £1,000) on a million pound holding. On the face of it a good saving but I lose Canada and perhaps my subtle weighting differences are a mistake ?
Perhaps we over think it and the cost saving is offset by our tinkering ?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests