Page 1 of 1
Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
Posted: May 30th, 2019, 1:01 pm
by OhNoNotimAgain
Consistent with prior research by S&P Dow Jones Indices,[1] we found that on a net-of-fees return basis, average managers did not outperform the benchmark over mid- to long-term horizons across all equity fund categories and many bond fund categories.
https://www.indexologyblog.com/2019/05/ ... -managers/
Re: Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
Posted: June 1st, 2019, 11:49 am
by Itsallaguess
OhNoNotimAgain wrote:
Consistent with prior research by S&P Dow Jones Indices, we found that on a net-of-fees return basis, average managers did not outperform the benchmark over mid- to long-term horizons...
Does that mean some
non-average managers
did outperform the benchmark?
Itsallaguess
Re: Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
Posted: June 1st, 2019, 11:05 pm
by xxd09
Yup-there is always one or two!
Good luck spotting them-Woodford?
Life is too short to gamble your with your Investments
xxd09
Re: Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
Posted: June 14th, 2019, 11:28 am
by StepOne
Itsallaguess wrote:OhNoNotimAgain wrote:
Consistent with prior research by S&P Dow Jones Indices, we found that on a net-of-fees return basis, average managers did not outperform the benchmark over mid- to long-term horizons...
Does that mean some
non-average managers
did outperform the benchmark?
Itsallaguess
Yes, and some other non-average ones under-performed the market, and still charged their customers.