Consistent with prior research by S&P Dow Jones Indices,[1] we found that on a net-of-fees return basis, average managers did not outperform the benchmark over mid- to long-term horizons across all equity fund categories and many bond fund categories.
https://www.indexologyblog.com/2019/05/ ... -managers/
Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site
Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 767
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:51 am
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 147 times
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
- Has thanked: 4140 times
- Been thanked: 10023 times
Re: Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
OhNoNotimAgain wrote:
Consistent with prior research by S&P Dow Jones Indices, we found that on a net-of-fees return basis, average managers did not outperform the benchmark over mid- to long-term horizons...
Does that mean some non-average managers did outperform the benchmark?
Itsallaguess
Re: Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
Yup-there is always one or two!
Good luck spotting them-Woodford?
Life is too short to gamble your with your Investments
xxd09
Good luck spotting them-Woodford?
Life is too short to gamble your with your Investments
xxd09
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 668
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:17 am
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 185 times
Re: Risk and rewards of selecting active managers
Itsallaguess wrote:OhNoNotimAgain wrote:
Consistent with prior research by S&P Dow Jones Indices, we found that on a net-of-fees return basis, average managers did not outperform the benchmark over mid- to long-term horizons...
Does that mean some non-average managers did outperform the benchmark?
Itsallaguess
Yes, and some other non-average ones under-performed the market, and still charged their customers.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests