Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site

Rebranding the London Overground

Passion, instruction, buying, care, maintenance and more, any form of vehicle discussion is welcome here
JohnB
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2509
Joined: January 15th, 2017, 9:20 am
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1008 times

Rebranding the London Overground

#647063

Postby JohnB » February 15th, 2024, 9:30 am

With the rebranding of the bits of the Overground, whats your order of names, best to worst.

1 Mildmay - inoffensive, but so, so obscure
2 Weaver - at least as a London expert I've heard of the Huguenots and the East End rag trade, or is in the Merseyside metro
3 Windrush - but its a river in Oxfordshire
4 Sufragette - No idea where in the UK they lived
5 Liberty - could be anywhere, forgotten already
6 Lioness - based on a temporary sporting success

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68296483

orangepekoe
Posts: 33
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:36 pm
Has thanked: 1998 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647067

Postby orangepekoe » February 15th, 2024, 9:47 am

I'm still calling the one that goes to Kew Gardens 'the North London Line'. Looks like it's now the Mildmay line but i doubt I'll remember that.

the0ni0nking
Lemon Slice
Posts: 375
Joined: November 9th, 2016, 1:59 pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647069

Postby the0ni0nking » February 15th, 2024, 9:53 am

I could have rebadged them for a lot cheaper than £6.3m

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7896
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647078

Postby mc2fool » February 15th, 2024, 10:29 am

Beh, well half of them are just end-to-end straight lines, so the most obvious and clear naming for those would be the Gospel Oak - Barking, Euston - Watford and Romford - Upminster lines.

The one coming out of Liverpool Street could be shown as two lines, as it splits after the first station, and one of those is also a straight line, Liverpool Street - Chingford. That'd leave two lines with forks, Liverpool Street to Cheshunt/Enfield Town and Stratford to Richmond/Clapham Junction, and the multi-fork line that goes through Canada Water....

I get having different colours, but it will mean having to be extra clear to tourists when pointing out that they want the District line, that's the green one, the single green one, not the double green one....

didds
Lemon Half
Posts: 5311
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 3296 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647130

Postby didds » February 15th, 2024, 2:36 pm

mc2fool wrote:Beh, well half of them are just end-to-end straight lines, so the most obvious and clear naming for those would be the Gospel Oak - Barking, Euston - Watford and Romford - Upminster lines..


Or for ease of use, in turn

Gosking - or Baroak
Euwat - or Watston
Romster - or Upford

I rather like the second one in particular!

DrFfybes
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3792
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 1198 times
Been thanked: 1987 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647138

Postby DrFfybes » February 15th, 2024, 3:02 pm

the0ni0nking wrote:I could have rebadged them for a lot cheaper than £6.3m


Yes, but had you done it would it have improved staffing numbers and train cleanliness and reliability?

staffordian
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2300
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 4:20 pm
Has thanked: 1900 times
Been thanked: 870 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647151

Postby staffordian » February 15th, 2024, 4:30 pm

mc2fool wrote:Beh, well half of them are just end-to-end straight lines, so the most obvious and clear naming for those would be the Gospel Oak - Barking, Euston - Watford and Romford - Upminster lines.

There's precedent.

Wasn't the suburban service from St Pancras to Bedford know as the BedPan line? :)

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18952
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 636 times
Been thanked: 6684 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647158

Postby Lootman » February 15th, 2024, 4:58 pm

orangepekoe wrote:I'm still calling the one that goes to Kew Gardens 'the North London Line'. Looks like it's now the Mildmay line but i doubt I'll remember that.

Indeed, it is actually very useful if you live in, er, North London. :D

The quirky Gospel Oak (Suffragette) line is closest to my house though, at least since the Ally Pally line was closed decades ago.

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7896
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647220

Postby mc2fool » February 15th, 2024, 9:00 pm

Lootman wrote:
orangepekoe wrote:I'm still calling the one that goes to Kew Gardens 'the North London Line'. Looks like it's now the Mildmay line but i doubt I'll remember that.

Indeed, it is actually very useful if you live in, er, North London. :D

The North London line that goes to South and Southwest London.... ;)

I reckon there's a fair case for naming the Highbury & Islington west-then-south to Clapham Junction and Clapham Junction east-then-north to Highbury & Islington sections as the Outer Circle Line.....

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18952
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 636 times
Been thanked: 6684 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647225

Postby Lootman » February 15th, 2024, 9:14 pm

mc2fool wrote:
Lootman wrote:Indeed, it is actually very useful if you live in, er, North London. :D

The North London line that goes to South and Southwest London.... ;)

I reckon there's a fair case for naming the Highbury & Islington west-then-south to Clapham Junction and Clapham Junction east-then-north to Highbury & Islington sections as the Outer Circle Line.....

I give a special exemption to places in South London that are just south of the river, granting them honourary North London status. Examples are Richmond, Kew, Putney, Nine Elms, South Bank, London Bridge and Greenwich. In fact I lived off Putney High Street for a year or so. And one of my sons bought a flat in Bermondsey, although he is now in Dalston.

The rest of South London is a vast hinterland of which I know nothing. :D

I like your outer circle idea. But will it mostly be used by homeless folks trying to keep warm and dry, like the inner circle line?

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7896
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647236

Postby mc2fool » February 15th, 2024, 9:42 pm

Lootman wrote:
mc2fool wrote:The North London line that goes to South and Southwest London.... ;)

I reckon there's a fair case for naming the Highbury & Islington west-then-south to Clapham Junction and Clapham Junction east-then-north to Highbury & Islington sections as the Outer Circle Line.....

I give a special exemption to places in South London that are just south of the river, granting them honourary North London status. Examples are Richmond, Kew, Putney, Nine Elms, South Bank, London Bridge and Greenwich. In fact I lived off Putney High Street for a year or so. And one of my sons bought a flat in Bermondsey, although he is now in Dalston.

Beh, there's nothing North London about any of those but some of South London is north of the river.

Heck, even the King lives in South London ... Buckingham Palace, London SW1A 1AA ;)

Hallucigenia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2685
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 3:03 am
Has thanked: 170 times
Been thanked: 1777 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647248

Postby Hallucigenia » February 15th, 2024, 10:52 pm

didds wrote:
mc2fool wrote:Beh, well half of them are just end-to-end straight lines, so the most obvious and clear naming for those would be the Gospel Oak - Barking, Euston - Watford and Romford - Upminster lines..

Or for ease of use, in turn

Gosking - or Baroak


Urgggh! The Gospel Oak - Barking line already has a perfectly good nickname which I'm disappointed they didn't formalise - Goblin.

9873210
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1020
Joined: December 9th, 2016, 6:44 am
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 308 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647264

Postby 9873210 » February 16th, 2024, 3:37 am

Names are not descriptions. Names should be short, pronounceable, memorable, and distinguishable from names for other transport facilities.
All of these are at least as good as Victoria, Elizabeth or Jubilee, which could be objected to on exactly the same grounds.

In particular honouring people who where good at choosing their parents as opposed to people who worked to accomplish something is distasteful.

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7896
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647279

Postby mc2fool » February 16th, 2024, 8:39 am

9873210 wrote:Names are not descriptions. Names should be short, pronounceable, memorable, and distinguishable from names for other transport facilities.
All of these are at least as good as Victoria, Elizabeth or Jubilee, which could be objected to on exactly the same grounds.

Most of the tube line names are descriptions, certainly in origin at least. Bakerloo (Baker Street and Waterloo Railway), Circle, Central, Hammersmith & City, Northern and Waterloo & City are all descriptive. The Piccadilly line (Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway) runs through Piccadilly Circus and the Metropolitan and District also indicate where they go, albeit more generally.

And the Victoria line was named after the main line station which was its original terminus.

"The name "Victoria line" dates from 1955; other suggestions were "Walvic line" (Walthamstow–Victoria), "Viking line" (Victoria–King's Cross), "Mayfair line" and "West End line". During the planning stages, it was known as Route C and named the Victoria line (after the station) by David McKenna, Chairman of British Transport Advertising, whose suggestion was seconded by Sir John Elliot. The board decided that the Victoria line sounded "just right"." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_line

9873210 wrote:In particular honouring people who where good at choosing their parents as opposed to people who worked to accomplish something is distasteful.

What you mean like the Elizabeth line, or the Jubilee line, which honoured an event in the life of someone good at choosing their parents? :D

Hallucigenia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2685
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 3:03 am
Has thanked: 170 times
Been thanked: 1777 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647300

Postby Hallucigenia » February 16th, 2024, 10:49 am

mc2fool wrote:The name "Victoria line" dates from 1955; other suggestions were "Walvic line" (Walthamstow–Victoria), "Viking line" (Victoria–King's Cross)


Viking is elegant, I like that, even if the "i" isn't right.

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18952
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 636 times
Been thanked: 6684 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647343

Postby Lootman » February 16th, 2024, 12:44 pm

Hallucigenia wrote:
didds wrote:Or for ease of use, in turn

Gosking - or Baroak

Urgggh! The Gospel Oak - Barking line already has a perfectly good nickname which I'm disappointed they didn't formalise - Goblin.

Goblin has the misfortune of not making a politically correct point or otherwise embracing a woke ideology, and so of course was a non-starter.

Moreover "Goblin" could be considered to be insulting to those less blessed with stature or looks amongst our population.

didds
Lemon Half
Posts: 5311
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 3296 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647369

Postby didds » February 16th, 2024, 2:58 pm

whereas "woke" is pure and simply in its modern day usage a puerile and insulting pejorative.

Howyoudoin
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1254
Joined: June 4th, 2018, 7:58 pm
Has thanked: 604 times
Been thanked: 686 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647370

Postby Howyoudoin » February 16th, 2024, 3:06 pm

I hate the Mayor with a passion but this seems like one of his better ideas.

People didn't like CrossRail being renamed the Elizabeth Line at first but now it just seems normal, as I suspect it will with the new Overground line names before long.

HYD

didds
Lemon Half
Posts: 5311
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 3296 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647373

Postby didds » February 16th, 2024, 3:13 pm

It wasn't until a couple of weeks ago I learned that Crossrail is now named the Elizabeth line. I just thought the latter was a new line and Crossrail had died a death sometime in the 90s and got swept under a carpet.

didds
Lemon Half
Posts: 5311
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 3296 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: Rebranding the London Overground

#647374

Postby didds » February 16th, 2024, 3:14 pm

didds wrote:It wasn't until a couple of weeks ago I learned that Crossrail is now named the Elizabeth line. I just thought the latter was a new line and Crossrail had died a death sometime in the 90s and got swept under a carpet.


I expect when "HS2" is finally finished as a branch line between Slough and Peterborough it will be renamed something like "Wibble Line" to hide the embarrassment ..


Return to “Cars, Driving, Motorbikes or any Transport”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests