TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:Without following that link I'm guessing...
1. That seems a bizarre approach to me. Why guess at what something might mean as opposed to reading the source itself so as to see/understand what it means? If time's short better to ignore iIMO. But don't guess, it's too error prone.
TheMotorcycleBoy wrote:...this is what tik is trying to tell us.
2. The linked article was by Lacy Hunt and Van Hoisington so it tells us what they think, not what I think which doesn't much matter. Their views are more interesting than mine due to their exceptional long term track record and the non consensus opinion being expressed. So, linking isn't endorsement but just a means of flagging up something that might be of interest to others. If it's not of much interest then that's fine just ignore it - it's a big internet out there after all.
This is all a bit meta discussion, so apologies.