Page 2 of 2

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 1st, 2019, 7:42 pm
by kiloran
PinkDalek wrote:Even so, bungeejumper made reference, I believe, to the day after New Year's Day. Is there more to tell or do many Grocer's celebrate New Year's Eve to such an extent that they are still suffering on 2 January? Unless his Grocer is based in Scotland, which would most likely explain the situation.


Noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!

--kiloran

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 1st, 2019, 8:56 pm
by PinkDalek
kiloran wrote:
PinkDalek wrote:Is there more to tell or do many Grocer's celebrate New Year's Eve to such an extent that they are still suffering on 2 January?


Noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!

--kiloran


I'm glad to note someone was paying attention. I'll leave it to you to decide whether or not the mistake was deliberate. :mrgreen:

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 1st, 2019, 9:23 pm
by XFool
PinkDalek wrote:
AleisterCrowley wrote:The BBC seem to favour 'Isas', which looks awful

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48759591

Agreed but it is in their searchable style guide as Isa http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/academy/acad ... _2018.docx (as against ISAs https://www.gov.uk/individual-savings-accounts).

So why do they not call themselves 'The Bbc'?

- I could mention Nicholas Parsons and 'Just a Minute' here. But I won't. :lol:

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 1st, 2019, 9:25 pm
by XFool
EssDeeAitch wrote:Reading a good article on the Investors Chronicle on housing the journalist stated ".......estimates that only a quarter of 27 year-olds now own their own property, compared with 43% in the early 2000's"

Really? A quarter compared to 43%? Why not 25% and 43%? I do understand that it is not difficult (or even a challenge) to mentally compute the scale of the difference by oh why mix up imperial and metric units?

When did vulgar fractions become "Imperial units", or percentages "Metric units"? ;)

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 1st, 2019, 9:58 pm
by AleisterCrowley
XFool wrote:
PinkDalek wrote:
AleisterCrowley wrote:The BBC seem to favour 'Isas', which looks awful

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48759591

Agreed but it is in their searchable style guide as Isa http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/academy/acad ... _2018.docx (as against ISAs https://www.gov.uk/individual-savings-accounts).

So why do they not call themselves 'The Bbc'?

...


Someone pointed that out in the BBC (erm Bbc ) comments section.

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 2nd, 2019, 5:01 am
by EssDeeAitch
XFool wrote:
EssDeeAitch wrote:Reading a good article on the Investors Chronicle on housing the journalist stated ".......estimates that only a quarter of 27 year-olds now own their own property, compared with 43% in the early 2000's"

Really? A quarter compared to 43%? Why not 25% and 43%? I do understand that it is not difficult (or even a challenge) to mentally compute the scale of the difference by oh why mix up imperial and metric units?

When did vulgar fractions become "Imperial units", or percentages "Metric units"? ;)


I certainly posted this in the correct forum :D

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 2nd, 2019, 8:52 am
by scotia
In my early working years I quickly learned that the ancient skilled turner in the workshop would become abusive if I attempted to mention mm. I had to quickly learn that one mm translated to forty thou (or near enough).

Re: One fourth, a quarter or 25% - but not all three

Posted: July 2nd, 2019, 10:34 am
by kiloran
XFool wrote:When did vulgar fractions become "Imperial units", or percentages "Metric units"? ;)

And when did perfectly respectable fractions become vulgar?

--kiloran