Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site
Apostrophes
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5320
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3300 times
- Been thanked: 1035 times
Apostrophes
Two different scenarios... based on rugby training sessions for backs (ie not forwards)
1) Here is a session on backs moves
2) This is a backs moves session.
Where do the apostrophe's go. I'm happy with here I think they should go ( on the word backs in both sentences) but I have met with some disagreement. So what do you clever people think?
didds
1) Here is a session on backs moves
2) This is a backs moves session.
Where do the apostrophe's go. I'm happy with here I think they should go ( on the word backs in both sentences) but I have met with some disagreement. So what do you clever people think?
didds
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 470
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 1:42 pm
- Has thanked: 223 times
- Been thanked: 210 times
Re: Apostrophes
Backs' moves.
But the sentence sounds awkward. Could you not say ' moves for backs' or something similar?
But the sentence sounds awkward. Could you not say ' moves for backs' or something similar?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5320
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3300 times
- Been thanked: 1035 times
Re: Apostrophes
Gaggsy wrote:Backs' moves.
But the sentence sounds awkward. Could you not say ' moves for backs' or something similar?
If only it were that simple... (in the case I need it for where I am proofing somebody else's words!)
Ive been directed to http://archives.cjr.org/language_corner ... essive.php which would decree that 2) doesn't have an apostrophe.
didds
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 195
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:25 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Apostrophes
They're both badly worded. But backs' is surely correct for the first one as the phrase fairly clearly infers the plural. For the second, I'd be inclined to put back's - you need something to indicate the possessive but it could be discussing the moves that a back should make.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2571
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1109 times
- Been thanked: 1170 times
Re: Apostrophes
I am not into rugby myself. Is "backs" treated as a mass noun or a plural? Does the singular exist?
Does this mean:
"Here is a session on moves performed by backs"
or,
"Here is a session on moves of type 'backs'"?
In the former case, there would be an apostrophe after the "s". It would be of the same form as "Here is a session on fielders' moves".
In the latter case, there would be no apostrophe. It would be of the same form as "Here is a session on fielder moves". One could also surmise that there should be no "s" after "back" either so the correct form should be "Here is a session on back moves". It depends upon how the word "backs" is treated.
All IMHO. I am not an authority on grammar.
Julian F. G. W.
didds wrote:Two different scenarios... based on rugby training sessions for backs (ie not forwards)
1) Here is a session on backs moves
didds
Does this mean:
"Here is a session on moves performed by backs"
or,
"Here is a session on moves of type 'backs'"?
In the former case, there would be an apostrophe after the "s". It would be of the same form as "Here is a session on fielders' moves".
In the latter case, there would be no apostrophe. It would be of the same form as "Here is a session on fielder moves". One could also surmise that there should be no "s" after "back" either so the correct form should be "Here is a session on back moves". It depends upon how the word "backs" is treated.
All IMHO. I am not an authority on grammar.
Julian F. G. W.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
Re: Apostrophes
If you look at https://www.rugbycoachweekly.net/rugby- ... cks-moves/ you'll see a lack of apostrophes.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5320
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3300 times
- Been thanked: 1035 times
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5320
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3300 times
- Been thanked: 1035 times
Re: Apostrophes
Cos i was actually after an answer not a heated debate over the rights of wrongs of the butcher's (<<--- apostrophe
didds
didds
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
Re: Apostrophes
didds wrote:Cos i was actually after an answer not a heated debate over the rights of wrongs of the butcher's (<<--- apostrophe
didds
Do you have the answer(s)?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
- Has thanked: 640 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Apostrophes
didds wrote:Ive been directed to http://archives.cjr.org/language_corner ... essive.php which would decree that 2) doesn't have an apostrophe.
Which is American and therefore automatically suspect for British English usage
I'd be more inclines to look here http://www.eng-lang.co.uk/apostrophe_rules.htm.
My own opinion would be that in each case backs is a plural (yes you can have one back) and you are talking about a possessive, whichever wat the sentence is constructed, so it should be backs' moves in both cases.
Slarti
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5320
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3300 times
- Been thanked: 1035 times
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5320
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3300 times
- Been thanked: 1035 times
Re: Apostrophes
PinkDalek wrote:didds wrote:Cos i was actually after an answer not a heated debate over the rights of wrongs of the butcher's (<<--- apostrophe
didds
Do you have the answer(s)?
No. LOL.
It's friendlier here
didds
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
Re: Apostrophes
Slarti wrote:...
My own opinion would be that in each case backs is a plural (yes you can have one back) and you are talking about a possessive, whichever wat the sentence is constructed, so it should be backs' moves in both cases.
Slarti
I don't agree as "backs" refers to "The backs". Being a term referring to all of the nancies as one (having been one of them, that is a polite reference).
Anyway, I'd prefer:
"This is a session on moves for the backs."
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
Re: Apostrophes
Stonge wrote:What is the point of the question mark?
Which particular question mark or is this a brand new DAK?
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 281
- Joined: April 11th, 2017, 5:27 pm
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: Apostrophes
Proofing someone' elses work does not necessarily exclude changes to bad structures.
Regards,
ep
Regards,
ep
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 9:58 pm
- Has thanked: 1395 times
- Been thanked: 3806 times
Re: Apostrophes
Biggles wrote:But backs' is surely correct for the first one as the phrase fairly clearly infers the plural.
Do you mean "...clearly implies the plural"?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6385
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1882 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests