Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site

R number

Grumpy Old Lemons Like You
BellaHubby
Lemon Pip
Posts: 91
Joined: January 21st, 2017, 11:57 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 62 times

R number

#315525

Postby BellaHubby » June 5th, 2020, 12:51 pm

All this talk of the "R number" is really bugging me.

"Mr Newton, what is this G number you've discovered?"
"Mr Einstein, is the C number constant"
Traffic cop...." Excuse me sir, but your V number was above the limit" (v = velocity)
"Happy Birthday. What is your Y number?"

Why can't they just say Reproduction rate"?

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 3643 times

Re: R number

#315531

Postby swill453 » June 5th, 2020, 12:58 pm

BellaHubby wrote:Why can't they just say Reproduction rate"?

Because that would be wrong, perhaps?

Scott.

jackdaww
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2081
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:53 am
Has thanked: 3203 times
Been thanked: 417 times

Re: R number

#315545

Postby jackdaww » June 5th, 2020, 1:44 pm

it has also been called the person to person RE-INFECTION rate which makes sense to me .

:idea: :idea:

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6381
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1880 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: R number

#315552

Postby AleisterCrowley » June 5th, 2020, 2:03 pm

Re-infection ? As in infected again?

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 3643 times

Re: R number

#315560

Postby swill453 » June 5th, 2020, 2:40 pm

jackdaww wrote:it has also been called the person to person RE-INFECTION rate which makes sense to me .

It's not a "rate".

Scott.

vrdiver
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2574
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 2:22 am
Has thanked: 552 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

Re: R number

#315563

Postby vrdiver » June 5th, 2020, 2:51 pm

BellaHubby wrote:Why can't they just say Reproduction rate"?

"R" or "R0" (R zero) is short for "Reproduction Number", rather than rate.

They could use the full term, but once it's understood, it might be deemed a bit clunky for repetitive usage, because then you'd want to specify what the reproduction number was associated with etc.

My personal view is that the usage of R0 or "the R number" has been adopted so as to make the speaker sound as if they have more expertise, i.e. they are familiar with this scientific slang, so obviously they'd be familiar with the science associated with it...

I actually don't care which terminology they adopt, but I do care about how various politicians seem to be able to "follow the science" whilst saying different things from one day to the next, despite the science not appearing to have changed...

VRD

kiloran
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4092
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:24 am
Has thanked: 3234 times
Been thanked: 2827 times

Re: R number

#315566

Postby kiloran » June 5th, 2020, 3:01 pm

vrdiver wrote:My personal view is that the usage of R0 or "the R number" has been adopted so as to make the speaker sound as if they have more expertise, i.e. they are familiar with this scientific slang, so obviously they'd be familiar with the science associated with it...

VRD

I think you've hit the nail on the head

--kiloran

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6381
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1880 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: R number

#315572

Postby AleisterCrowley » June 5th, 2020, 3:29 pm

vrdiver wrote:
BellaHubby wrote:Why can't they just say Reproduction rate"?

"R" or "R0" (R zero) is short for "Reproduction Number", rather than rate.

...

VRD

Why R0 (R zero) - what does the zero mean?

Slightly O/T but our highest fault priority is P0 (P Zero)
Not sure who came up with that - P0 is more important than , for example P2

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 3643 times

Re: R number

#315576

Postby swill453 » June 5th, 2020, 3:38 pm

AleisterCrowley wrote:Why R0 (R zero) - what does the zero mean?

R0 is the Basic Reproduction Number, a theoretical value for a population where everybody can catch the virus (nobody is immune).

This is as opposed to the Effective Reproduction Number RE (R with a subscript E) which relates to the actual current state of the population.

I'm sure Boris could explain why R0 rather than RE is always quoted :-)

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_reproduction_number

Scott.

bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8064
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2846 times
Been thanked: 3939 times

Re: R number

#315578

Postby bungeejumper » June 5th, 2020, 3:41 pm

As the HIGNFY Twitter feed (https://twitter.com/haveigotnews?) points out, the Prime Minister and his entire government have been battling hard to get the R number down over the last few weeks. That's R for Resignations, of course. ;)

BJ

jackdaww
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2081
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:53 am
Has thanked: 3203 times
Been thanked: 417 times

Re: R number

#315582

Postby jackdaww » June 5th, 2020, 3:53 pm

AleisterCrowley wrote:Re-infection ? As in infected again?


===================

i did say person to person .

but its not a rate , my mistake .

may be its a factor?

or does someone here actually know please ?

:?:

vrdiver
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2574
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 2:22 am
Has thanked: 552 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

Re: R number

#315587

Postby vrdiver » June 5th, 2020, 4:06 pm

jackdaww wrote:
AleisterCrowley wrote:Re-infection ? As in infected again?


===================

i did say person to person .

but its not a rate , my mistake .

may be its a factor?

or does someone here actually know please ?

:?:

I'm not an expert, or even an "educated man in the street" when it comes to this stuff, but if you want a serious answer, here's one from the horse's mouth: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/1/17-1901_article
The basic reproduction number (R0), pronounced “R naught,” is intended to be an indicator of the contagiousness or transmissibility of infectious and parasitic agents.

The rest of the article then explains much more.

VRD

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2059
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1032 times
Been thanked: 824 times

Re: R number

#315618

Postby GrahamPlatt » June 5th, 2020, 5:16 pm

R0 is only used when the whole population is susceptible (well, -1 of course) & thereby reproduction is at its highest level. As herd immunity develops, reproduction falls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_reproduction_number

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3561
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2371 times
Been thanked: 1943 times

Re: R number

#316208

Postby scotia » June 7th, 2020, 9:01 pm

kiloran wrote:
vrdiver wrote:My personal view is that the usage of R0 or "the R number" has been adopted so as to make the speaker sound as if they have more expertise, i.e. they are familiar with this scientific slang, so obviously they'd be familiar with the science associated with it...

VRD

I think you've hit the nail on the head

--kiloran

For those determined to keep ahead of the "sound as if they have more expertise" curve could I suggest they borrow a few impressive terms from nuclear reactor physics - and refer to sub-critical, critical and super-critical states in the virus growth. And to really impress the natives (or the cabinet members) they could refer to the reactivity which is the departure from criticality. :)

Edit - nuclear physicists refer to the "multiplication factor" with symbol "k" - don't ask me why!

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2059
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1032 times
Been thanked: 824 times

Re: R number

#316278

Postby GrahamPlatt » June 8th, 2020, 8:00 am

scotia wrote:Edit - nuclear physicists refer to the "multiplication factor" with symbol "k" - don't ask me why!


Whereas epidemiologists use “K” for the variation in individual contagiousness.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... down-eases

vrdiver
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2574
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 2:22 am
Has thanked: 552 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

Re: R number

#316308

Postby vrdiver » June 8th, 2020, 9:52 am

scotia wrote:nuclear physicists refer to the "multiplication factor" with symbol "k" - don't ask me why!

The "KABOOM!!!!" factor? :lol:

XFool
The full Lemon
Posts: 12636
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 2608 times

Re: R number

#316443

Postby XFool » June 8th, 2020, 4:05 pm

scotia wrote:Edit - nuclear physicists refer to the "multiplication factor" with symbol "k" - don't ask me why!

Well they could hardly use 'm' - 'm' is for mass - so why not 'k'?

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3561
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2371 times
Been thanked: 1943 times

Re: R number

#316462

Postby scotia » June 8th, 2020, 5:08 pm

XFool wrote:
scotia wrote:Edit - nuclear physicists refer to the "multiplication factor" with symbol "k" - don't ask me why!

Well they could hardly use 'm' - 'm' is for mass - so why not 'k'?

I appreciate that some shorthand character has to be chosen - but the wave number k = 2Pi/lambda was already frequently used in physics
So far I think vrdiver's explanation wins the day :)

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8271
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4435 times
Been thanked: 3564 times

Re: R number

#316572

Postby servodude » June 9th, 2020, 2:12 am

scotia wrote:
XFool wrote:
scotia wrote:Edit - nuclear physicists refer to the "multiplication factor" with symbol "k" - don't ask me why!

Well they could hardly use 'm' - 'm' is for mass - so why not 'k'?

I appreciate that some shorthand character has to be chosen - but the wave number k = 2Pi/lambda was already frequently used in physics
So far I think vrdiver's explanation wins the day :)


Doesn't everyone use K for transfer function gain?
- because, well... yeah now I think about it

- sd


Return to “Bitter Lemons”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests