Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site

Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

Grumpy Old Lemons Like You
kiloran
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4112
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:24 am
Has thanked: 3262 times
Been thanked: 2857 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#564937

Postby kiloran » January 30th, 2023, 9:43 am

servodude wrote:Personally the bit that really grates on my ears in this area is when aitch starts with a HAY.. :roll:
- normally by folk what drop 'em otherwise ;)

It's nothing new. I blame Tony Hancock... that's Hancock with a haitch

--kiloran

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8429
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4494 times
Been thanked: 3626 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#564946

Postby servodude » January 30th, 2023, 10:09 am

Tedx wrote:I think we have to be careful when discussing regional accents v deliberate speech affectations.

A regional accent, such as Weegie, might set your teeth on edge....but it's the way Weegies have communicated for millions of years.

But this, for example......https://youtu.be/0ouk_XEU-mw

Is not.


You'll be getting the same sense I do when one adopts the "lo.. the English they are too many" accent from Braveheart
- the "slow enough you have a chance but still sounds vaguely weegie enough to lend a bit of tartan colour" accent that nae ***t ever uses unless it's to make the poncey tourist really sure they are making fun of him

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8429
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4494 times
Been thanked: 3626 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#564949

Postby servodude » January 30th, 2023, 10:11 am

Mike4 wrote:
pje16 wrote:
Mike4 wrote:There is an equivalent I'm noticing in typing. People who mean to type “definitely” actually type “defiantly”
which some now seem to think is correct and means the same.

I saw one the other day
“little own”
own what I thought, and then I twigged,

"Let alone" :lol:


Good one, well spotted!

My fave, I think, is the "damp squid".


And to think we put these folk on "pedal stools"!

Tedx
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2075
Joined: December 14th, 2022, 10:59 am
Has thanked: 1849 times
Been thanked: 1489 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565008

Postby Tedx » January 30th, 2023, 2:16 pm

servodude wrote:
Mike4 wrote:
pje16 wrote:
Mike4 wrote:There is an equivalent I'm noticing in typing. People who mean to type “definitely” actually type “defiantly”
which some now seem to think is correct and means the same.

I saw one the other day
“little own”
own what I thought, and then I twigged,

"Let alone" :lol:


Good one, well spotted!

My fave, I think, is the "damp squid".


And to think we put these folk on "pedal stools"!


I Pacifically told you not to mention that

bluedonkey
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1812
Joined: November 13th, 2016, 3:41 pm
Has thanked: 1418 times
Been thanked: 655 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565029

Postby bluedonkey » January 30th, 2023, 3:32 pm

I think the "anotel" for "an hotel" is part of received pronunciation, or U rather than non-U.

pje16
Lemon Half
Posts: 6050
Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
Has thanked: 1843 times
Been thanked: 2067 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565032

Postby pje16 » January 30th, 2023, 3:40 pm

Tedx wrote:I Pacifically told you not to mention that

Shirley you're not serious ;)

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8313
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 920 times
Been thanked: 4154 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565038

Postby tjh290633 » January 30th, 2023, 3:53 pm

bluedonkey wrote:I think the "anotel" for "an hotel" is part of received pronunciation, or U rather than non-U.

It's what Nancy Mitford would have said.

TJH

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7536 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565041

Postby Dod101 » January 30th, 2023, 4:03 pm

bluedonkey wrote:Not pronouncing the h in hotel. Sounds like anotel.


My father in law was an old style headmaster and knew what he was on about but always used 'an 'otel'. It actually rolls off the tongue better anyway. I use 'a hote'l but it is always a bit jarring. I can only imagine that that is the way he was taught from school days because he was anything but affectatious.

Dod

ReformedCharacter
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3144
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
Has thanked: 3659 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565048

Postby ReformedCharacter » January 30th, 2023, 4:34 pm

Dod101 wrote:
bluedonkey wrote:Not pronouncing the h in hotel. Sounds like anotel.


My father in law was an old style headmaster and knew what he was on about but always used 'an 'otel'. It actually rolls off the tongue better anyway. I use 'a hote'l but it is always a bit jarring. I can only imagine that that is the way he was taught from school days because he was anything but affectatious.

Dod

That's the way I was taught to say it, I see Wikipedia has this:

In English, The pronunciation of ⟨h⟩ as /h/ can be analyzed as a voiceless vowel. That is, when the phoneme /h/ precedes a vowel, /h/ may be realized as a voiceless version of the subsequent vowel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H

RC

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7992
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 993 times
Been thanked: 3662 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565051

Postby swill453 » January 30th, 2023, 4:58 pm

To be honest, whoever made the rule made a horlicks of it...

Scott.

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10447
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3649 times
Been thanked: 5283 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565057

Postby Arborbridge » January 30th, 2023, 5:47 pm

As a minor pendant myself (sic) I'm enjoying this thread. I hadn't realised that some of the things seen lately were common experiences, were a "thing" - such as the recent "defiantly" or the much older "arks".

'otel is not an affectation but just an acknowledgement of a time when the ruling classes centuries ago would have spoken French. More than 500 years, but we still remember it with some resentment!

Spellings did not settle until quite late on - after Shakespeare - and that has given lots of room for error.

I must go and re-read about the great vowel shift - I never did fully understand it :(

Arb

bluedonkey
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1812
Joined: November 13th, 2016, 3:41 pm
Has thanked: 1418 times
Been thanked: 655 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565058

Postby bluedonkey » January 30th, 2023, 5:53 pm

I have to finally add restaurant pronounced a la francaise rather than with a hard t at the end. My awareness of this probably reveals some lower middle class insecurities, no doubt.

UncleEbenezer
The full Lemon
Posts: 10841
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 1476 times
Been thanked: 3021 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565114

Postby UncleEbenezer » January 30th, 2023, 11:36 pm

Dod101 wrote:
bluedonkey wrote:Not pronouncing the h in hotel. Sounds like anotel.


My father in law was an old style headmaster and knew what he was on about but always used 'an 'otel'. It actually rolls off the tongue better anyway. I use 'a hote'l but it is always a bit jarring. I can only imagine that that is the way he was taught from school days because he was anything but affectatious.

Dod

Perhaps you should combine that with a glo'al stop for the t? Sounding the word "o 'ell".

bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8166
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2901 times
Been thanked: 3999 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565188

Postby bungeejumper » January 31st, 2023, 11:59 am

I hereby nominate the American author of this list for an honourary pendants reward. I might almost have mistaken him for a Brit, if only he hadn't failed to include "different than" in his prohibited list. :(

But, irregardless of this and for all intensive purposes, the general affect of his recommendations is to insure that these regretfully elicit offenses against the language ought to become lesser everyday. Well, at least in principal.

https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/75-incor ... -dumb.html

I am literally speechless.

BJ

pje16
Lemon Half
Posts: 6050
Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
Has thanked: 1843 times
Been thanked: 2067 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565191

Postby pje16 » January 31st, 2023, 12:04 pm

bungeejumper wrote:I hereby nominate the American author of this list for an honourary pendants reward. I might almost have mistaken him for a Brit, if only he hadn't failed to include "different than" in his prohibited list. :(

But, irregardless of this and for all intensive purposes, the general affect of his recommendations is to insure that these regretfully elicit offenses against the language ought to become lesser everyday. Well, at least in principal.

https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/75-incor ... -dumb.html

I am literally speechless.

BJ

A lot of good ones on that link
BUT
Award and reward (really.... I mean really :roll: )

bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8166
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2901 times
Been thanked: 3999 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565195

Postby bungeejumper » January 31st, 2023, 12:19 pm

I think it was David Coleman who reported, during some snooker match I think, that the crowd were "literally electrified, and glued to their seats".

BJ

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6101
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565268

Postby dealtn » January 31st, 2023, 3:56 pm

Tedx wrote:
I hate that ...


some use your instead of you're

Watis
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1427
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 356 times
Been thanked: 500 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565275

Postby Watis » January 31st, 2023, 4:46 pm

dealtn wrote:
Tedx wrote:
I hate that ...


some use your instead of you're


Yes - their really annoying!

Watis

pje16
Lemon Half
Posts: 6050
Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
Has thanked: 1843 times
Been thanked: 2067 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565278

Postby pje16 » January 31st, 2023, 4:53 pm

Watis wrote:Yes - their really annoying!

Watis

Surely you meant there :lol: :lol: :lol:

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10447
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3649 times
Been thanked: 5283 times

Re: Unnecessary Speech Affectations.

#565287

Postby Arborbridge » January 31st, 2023, 6:08 pm

bluedonkey wrote:I have to finally add restaurant pronounced a la francaise rather than with a hard t at the end. My awareness of this probably reveals some lower middle class insecurities, no doubt.


To my ear it just sounds horrid with a hard "t" at the end. Funny how we complain about people losing the consonants at the ends of words, but it isn't meant to be sounded, we complain also.

Arb.


Return to “Bitter Lemons”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests