Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to lansdown,Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08, for Donating to support the site

Musk endeavours

The Big Picture Place
odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659838

Postby odysseus2000 » April 16th, 2024, 1:34 pm

Howard wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:Meanwhile everyone is focused on Tesla & ignoring competitors. Ford has tried to make BEV & is struggling, down about 2.8% after a bit of post market support. GM, Toyota et al are all losing sales to electric cars. It is clear that folk don’t want internal combustion, the market is moving rapidly to BEV.

Regards,


TOKYO, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Japan's Toyota Motor (7203.T), raised its full-year operating profit forecast by nearly 9% on Tuesday, after its third-quarter earnings raced past analysts' estimates thanks to a weaker yen and strong sales of high-margin cars and hybrid vehicles.

Toyota's profits are looking good. They are selling huge numbers of premium cars like Lexus and profitable hybrids. 2024 has been good for them so far and they have been increasing their workforce gradually over the last ten years with a brief drop during Covid.

regards

Howard


Toyota sales 2016 to 2023:

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/char ... ta/revenue

2023 was less than 2022 & 2023 was less than 2020.

What they do this year is unknown, one good quarter does not make guaranteed good following quarters.

Regards,

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2194
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 889 times
Been thanked: 1022 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659841

Postby Howard » April 16th, 2024, 1:45 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:
Howard wrote:
TOKYO, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Japan's Toyota Motor (7203.T), raised its full-year operating profit forecast by nearly 9% on Tuesday, after its third-quarter earnings raced past analysts' estimates thanks to a weaker yen and strong sales of high-margin cars and hybrid vehicles.

Toyota's profits are looking good. They are selling huge numbers of premium cars like Lexus and profitable hybrids. 2024 has been good for them so far and they have been increasing their workforce gradually over the last ten years with a brief drop during Covid.

regards

Howard


Toyota sales 2016 to 2023:

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/char ... ta/revenue

2023 was less than 2022 & 2023 was less than 2020.

What they do this year is unknown, one good quarter does not make guaranteed good following quarters.

Regards,


Your link shows exactly how well Toyota are doing.

Why post something which shows the opposite of the case you are making? It doesn't make sense. :(

Quote from your link - Toyota revenue for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 was $311.702B, a 15.06% increase year-over-year.

The ten year trend indicates that Toyota is doing pretty well from a volume viewpoint and even better from a profitability view.

Like all auto stocks it can be a bumpy ride - just look at Tesla.

regards

Howard

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659848

Postby odysseus2000 » April 16th, 2024, 2:40 pm

Howard wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:
Toyota sales 2016 to 2023:

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/char ... ta/revenue

2023 was less than 2022 & 2023 was less than 2020.

What they do this year is unknown, one good quarter does not make guaranteed good following quarters.

Regards,


Your link shows exactly how well Toyota are doing.

Why post something which shows the opposite of the case you are making? It doesn't make sense. :(

Quote from your link - Toyota revenue for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 was $311.702B, a 15.06% increase year-over-year.

The ten year trend indicates that Toyota is doing pretty well from a volume viewpoint and even better from a profitability view.

Like all auto stocks it can be a bumpy ride - just look at Tesla.

regards

Howard


I was quoting yearly revenue, not cherry picking a good quarter to give a more favorable picture.

Currently interest rates are up, if they stay up or the currency markets move unfavourable things can change a lot.

Regards,

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2194
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 889 times
Been thanked: 1022 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659852

Postby Howard » April 16th, 2024, 3:21 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:
Howard wrote:
Your link shows exactly how well Toyota are doing.

Why post something which shows the opposite of the case you are making? It doesn't make sense. :(

Quote from your link - Toyota revenue for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 was $311.702B, a 15.06% increase year-over-year.

The ten year trend indicates that Toyota is doing pretty well from a volume viewpoint and even better from a profitability view.

Like all auto stocks it can be a bumpy ride - just look at Tesla.

regards

Howard


I was quoting yearly revenue, not cherry picking a good quarter to give a more favorable picture.

Currently interest rates are up, if they stay up or the currency markets move unfavourable things can change a lot.

Regards,


So, yes thank you Ody for supplying the link which showed that Toyota has been performing well over 10 years and did really well last year - revenue up 15.06% for the full year. Followed by a brilliant first quarter in 2024. What's not to like? ;)

regards

Howard

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659861

Postby odysseus2000 » April 16th, 2024, 4:00 pm

Howard wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:
I was quoting yearly revenue, not cherry picking a good quarter to give a more favorable picture.

Currently interest rates are up, if they stay up or the currency markets move unfavourable things can change a lot.

Regards,


So, yes thank you Ody for supplying the link which showed that Toyota has been performing well over 10 years and did really well last year - revenue up 15.06% for the full year. Followed by a brilliant first quarter in 2024. What's not to like? ;)

regards

Howard


From Toyota’s perspective, that the model Y is the best selling car in the world, not a Toyota!

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659864

Postby odysseus2000 » April 16th, 2024, 4:14 pm

Morgan out with note arguing Tesla has a demand problem:

https://x.com/deitaone/status/178019203 ... DCpgdbFBxg

No reply from Tesla that I have seen, also some saying Tesla is cutting 20% in some divisions:

https://x.com/stockmktnewz/status/17799 ... DCpgdbFBxg

Tesla has 140k employees, so if cut is 10% of work force, that is 14k jobs gone.

Average us salalary is over $59k, round to $60k, so $14,000x 60,000 = $840 m saved after redundancy costs have been paid out.

Tesla revenue is 97b (2023), pre tax profits was $10b for 2023, so almost a 10% increase in pre tax profits from these job cuts.

Each person fired has a terrible time, but the business benefits, such are the cruel ways of business!

Regards,

bluedonkey
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1810
Joined: November 13th, 2016, 3:41 pm
Has thanked: 1417 times
Been thanked: 653 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659880

Postby bluedonkey » April 16th, 2024, 6:29 pm

88V8 wrote:
ReformedCharacter wrote:Yes but, for example, the once mighty British car and motorcycle industries dug their own graves by producing poor quality, inferior products.

Yes, but, iirc the unions also had a lot to do with it.

Seems that Musk is not enamoured of Unions which is a point in his favour.

Musk said: “I disagree with the idea of unions … I just don’t like anything which creates a lords and peasants sort of thing.”

V8

He prefers a lords and vassals sort of thing perhaps?

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659894

Postby odysseus2000 » April 16th, 2024, 9:39 pm

bluedonkey wrote:
88V8 wrote:Yes, but, iirc the unions also had a lot to do with it.

Seems that Musk is not enamoured of Unions which is a point in his favour.

Musk said: “I disagree with the idea of unions … I just don’t like anything which creates a lords and peasants sort of thing.”

V8

He prefers a lords and vassals sort of thing perhaps?


Tesla factories are operated like many Japanese ones where the engineers work next to the assembly line & are available for instant discussion if problems arise, also a shared canteen etc. All employees receive Tesla stock as part of their compensation.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659965

Postby odysseus2000 » April 17th, 2024, 11:42 am


odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#659986

Postby odysseus2000 » April 17th, 2024, 2:27 pm

Tesla to put Elon Musk pay package to a vote & also plans to move filings from Delaware to Texas:

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/17/elon-mu ... grant.html

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660000

Postby odysseus2000 » April 17th, 2024, 4:50 pm

Argument that Tesla will have to raise cash:

https://x.com/edwarddigi/status/1780494 ... DCpgdbFBxg

Personally doubt it, but interesting idea that Nvidia are draining billions out of Tesla for its tensor chips & assumes dojo does not contribute to stem the outflows.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660084

Postby odysseus2000 » April 18th, 2024, 9:32 am

Web site for questions at next weeks report:

https://app.saytechnologies.com/tesla-2024-q1

Information for upcoming vote at the Stock holder meeting 13th June:

https://www.supportteslavalue.com/

More details on the boards view re shareholder meeting on the 13th:

https://www.supportteslavalue.com/wp-co ... 7-2024.pdf

All links thanks to this YouTube by Electrified:

https://youtu.be/xpWL9S6VIpo?si=NQ3Yo3hoYRTPenN_

Interesting times with major issues that could radically change the entire company depending upon what the vote is in June.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660208

Postby odysseus2000 » April 18th, 2024, 9:27 pm

Interesting how battery storage has become the greatest source of supply on the California grid, delivering power to the 5th largest economy on the planet:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/178097580 ... DCpgdbFBxg

It is difficult for me to believe that any economy can be competitive if there is not substantial energy storage on the grid. Where California is now leading, others will either follow or devise some thing better to remain competitive.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660336

Postby odysseus2000 » April 19th, 2024, 3:06 pm

Collectively US drivers drive 3.2 billion miles per year:

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+man ... e&ie=UTF-8

There are 6 million car accidents per year:

https://www.ddlawtampa.com/resources/ca ... ach%20year.

Probability of an accident is 6 million/(3.2 billion) = 6e6/3.2e9 approx .002 per Mile driven, or 0.998 probability of not having an accident.

If Tesla are to be an order of magnitude better, that is they need to reach 0.9998 probability of not having an accident.

If this can be achieved instead of 38,000 car related deaths per year there would be 3,800 in the US. These are big numbers especially if you transition from one of the 38,000 who is killed to one of the 34,200 who is not killed.

How close are Tesla to this 0.9998 probability? I have no idea, but Tesla do which may be why they are so gung-ho about FSD, or cynics might argue it is all a smoke screen to cover up poor sales.

Regards,

doolally
Lemon Slice
Posts: 649
Joined: February 8th, 2021, 10:55 am
Has thanked: 108 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660345

Postby doolally » April 19th, 2024, 3:45 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:Collectively US drivers drive 3.2 billion miles per year:

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+man ... e&ie=UTF-8

There are 6 million car accidents per year:

https://www.ddlawtampa.com/resources/ca ... ach%20year.

Probability of an accident is 6 million/(3.2 billion) = 6e6/3.2e9 approx .002 per Mile driven, or 0.998 probability of not having an accident.

If Tesla are to be an order of magnitude better, that is they need to reach 0.9998 probability of not having an accident.

If this can be achieved instead of 38,000 car related deaths per year there would be 3,800 in the US. These are big numbers especially if you transition from one of the 38,000 who is killed to one of the 34,200 who is not killed.

How close are Tesla to this 0.9998 probability? I have no idea, but Tesla do which may be why they are so gung-ho about FSD, or cynics might argue it is all a smoke screen to cover up poor sales.

Regards,

If Tesla were to achieve that level of performance, it would only be meaningful if:
a...all cars were Teslas (or licensed to use Tesla's FSD)
b...all cars had FSD switched on

In reality, cars currently on the road are likely to be on the road for the next 20 years or so. And many drivers want to drive like idiots so will switch FSD off. I don't see even 100% perfect FSD having any real effect on road deaths/accidents for many decades.
doolally

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660366

Postby odysseus2000 » April 19th, 2024, 4:44 pm

doolally wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:Collectively US drivers drive 3.2 billion miles per year:

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+man ... e&ie=UTF-8

There are 6 million car accidents per year:

https://www.ddlawtampa.com/resources/ca ... ach%20year.

Probability of an accident is 6 million/(3.2 billion) = 6e6/3.2e9 approx .002 per Mile driven, or 0.998 probability of not having an accident.

If Tesla are to be an order of magnitude better, that is they need to reach 0.9998 probability of not having an accident.

If this can be achieved instead of 38,000 car related deaths per year there would be 3,800 in the US. These are big numbers especially if you transition from one of the 38,000 who is killed to one of the 34,200 who is not killed.

How close are Tesla to this 0.9998 probability? I have no idea, but Tesla do which may be why they are so gung-ho about FSD, or cynics might argue it is all a smoke screen to cover up poor sales.

Regards,

If Tesla were to achieve that level of performance, it would only be meaningful if:
a...all cars were Teslas (or licensed to use Tesla's FSD)
b...all cars had FSD switched on

In reality, cars currently on the road are likely to be on the road for the next 20 years or so. And many drivers want to drive like idiots so will switch FSD off. I don't see even 100% perfect FSD having any real effect on road deaths/accidents for many decades.
doolally


It depends on insurance companies & legislators.

If FSD both in Tesla cars & in licensed cars do achieve low accidents, the premiums for non FSD cars will likely rise substantially. The last thing an insurance company wants to do is to pay out money it has collected by premiums & if it has to it can argue that it needs more margin on theses so that it can lower policies for FSD drivers.

Additionally if the regulators decide that there are too many accidents from manual drive cars they can easily mandate who is allowed to drive where & when, making manual drive cars things most folk will feel are too restrictive.

Of course if FSD is not 10x humans all these arguments go away, but if it is there is plenty of case law to support safety in cars. When seat belts came in it was argued that they were too dangerous to use, but now everyone uses them, similarly air bags made cars too expensive, yet most cars have air bags & other safety features & the death rate on uk roads has gone from 20 per day, to 10 per day.

Regards,

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2194
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 889 times
Been thanked: 1022 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660529

Postby Howard » April 20th, 2024, 12:33 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:
If FSD both in Tesla cars & in licensed cars do achieve low accidents, the premiums for non FSD cars will likely rise substantially. The last thing an insurance company wants to do is to pay out money it has collected by premiums & if it has to it can argue that it needs more margin on theses so that it can lower policies for FSD drivers.

Additionally if the regulators decide that there are too many accidents from manual drive cars they can easily mandate who is allowed to drive where & when, making manual drive cars things most folk will feel are too restrictive.

Of course if FSD is not 10x humans all these arguments go away, but if it is there is plenty of case law to support safety in cars. When seat belts came in it was argued that they were too dangerous to use, but now everyone uses them, similarly air bags made cars too expensive, yet most cars have air bags & other safety features & the death rate on uk roads has gone from 20 per day, to 10 per day.

Regards,


There is a level of naivety in this argument - a lack of understanding of how insurers measure risk. Teslas are very expensive to insure both in Europe, the UK and the USA and possibly in China? They are much more expensive to repair than similar ICE cars and hybrids.

FSD is currently pretty useless at slow speeds - as evidenced by Teslas inability to self park in real life situations. FSD may offer some protection against higher speed accidents but will be useless if the car is rammed by other cars in, say a motorway accident, a city centre collision or even a slow speed parking bump.

A major part of the cost of insuring cars is the cost of repairs and this is a major problem for Tesla because of the complexity of their cars. The risk of expensive damage is significantly affected by the lifestyle of the driver - for example is the car regularly parked in city centres late at night outside a nightclub or restaurant?

The above are some of the reasons that Tesla are losing so much money providing insurance for their cars in the USA.

One interesting problem Tesla (and to be fair other manufacturers have) is that drivers can turn off the "nanny state" limitations imposed by the car. Governments will have problems forcing drivers to keep FSD switched on in all situations.

FSD may develop further, but insurance costs may be a minor factor. FSD has to prove itself to regulators. This will be a tough job.

regards

Howard

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660550

Postby odysseus2000 » April 20th, 2024, 1:54 pm

Howard wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:
If FSD both in Tesla cars & in licensed cars do achieve low accidents, the premiums for non FSD cars will likely rise substantially. The last thing an insurance company wants to do is to pay out money it has collected by premiums & if it has to it can argue that it needs more margin on theses so that it can lower policies for FSD drivers.

Additionally if the regulators decide that there are too many accidents from manual drive cars they can easily mandate who is allowed to drive where & when, making manual drive cars things most folk will feel are too restrictive.

Of course if FSD is not 10x humans all these arguments go away, but if it is there is plenty of case law to support safety in cars. When seat belts came in it was argued that they were too dangerous to use, but now everyone uses them, similarly air bags made cars too expensive, yet most cars have air bags & other safety features & the death rate on uk roads has gone from 20 per day, to 10 per day.

Regards,



There is a level of naivety in this argument - a lack of understanding of how insurers measure risk. Teslas are very expensive to insure both in Europe, the UK and the USA and possibly in China? They are much more expensive to repair than similar ICE cars and hybrids.

FSD is currently pretty useless at slow speeds - as evidenced by Teslas inability to self park in real life situations. FSD may offer some protection against higher speed accidents but will be useless if the car is rammed by other cars in, say a motorway accident, a city centre collision or even a slow speed parking bump.

A major part of the cost of insuring cars is the cost of repairs and this is a major problem for Tesla because of the complexity of their cars. The risk of expensive damage is significantly affected by the lifestyle of the driver - for example is the car regularly parked in city centres late at night outside a nightclub or restaurant?

The above are some of the reasons that Tesla are losing so much money providing insurance for their cars in the USA.

One interesting problem Tesla (and to be fair other manufacturers have) is that drivers can turn off the "nanny state" limitations imposed by the car. Governments will have problems forcing drivers to keep FSD switched on in all situations.

FSD may develop further, but insurance costs may be a minor factor. FSD has to prove itself to regulators. This will be a tough job.

regards

Howard


At the moment it is a purely academic discussion. We don’t know if FSD will be good enough to reduce accidents or not.

If FSD works & insurers have to pay out less on average for an FSD car they will embrace them & price accordingly.

If regulators get data that FSD cars are 10 or more times safer than non FSD cars there will be intense pressure to encourage rapid take up. As noted earlier a car that is 10x safer saves a lot of lives & a lot of money, both for insurance & health care & no regulator dare ignore such things.

If FSD can not be made to work then nothing changes.

For investors an investment or a short of Tesla is now a complex decision.

We can not know if the vote on the 13th of June will reinstate Elon Musk’s pay package & if not whether he will leave & sell his shares.

We do not know how safe the FSD cars are compared to human driven, but Tesla do.

We do not know what will happen with the proposed new smaller car.

We do not know what will be unveiled on the 8th of the 8th?

We do not know what margins Tesla is achieving.

We do not know how much money Tesla has spent on Nvidia chips & whether this has put their cash reserves into reverse.

We do not know what cyber truck or semi sales are or margins.

We do not know the future direction of interest rates.

We do not know if governments will begin to introduce carbon taxes.

We do not know if electric car sales will continue to increase. Sure it seems highly likely, but it is not 100% certain as the agents of big oil & legacy auto continue to pump out ever denser clouds of fud. Equally we do not know if ice car sales will continue to decline & how the second hand market will develop for both ice & bev.

It is never easy to make investment decisions as certainties have a way of not happening. E.g. the certainty that Nvidia sales & share price will rise relentlessly took a big hit on Friday.

Regards,

88V8
Lemon Half
Posts: 5852
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:22 am
Has thanked: 4207 times
Been thanked: 2607 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660575

Postby 88V8 » April 20th, 2024, 4:14 pm

Howard wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:If FSD both in Tesla cars & in licensed cars do achieve low accidents, the premiums for non FSD cars will likely rise substantially.

A major part of the cost of insuring cars is the cost of repairs and this is a major problem for Tesla because of the complexity of their cars.

The insurance on one of my ICE cars has gone up a third this month 'due to the increased cost of repairs'.
I wonder if I am subsidising the increased cost of repairing Tesla and other EVs.... no doubt there are stats somewhere.

A cursory search gives this

inter alia
..." many BEVs are often deemed irreparable, leading to premature write-offs because of high battery cost and the lack of value the UK ecosystem can recover from them.”
Currently, the cost of a replacement HV battery is causing a significant increase in the risk of ‘total loss’ or write-offs.


... BEV incident claims are currently 25.5% more expensive than their ICE equivalents and can take 14% longer to repair, suggests Thatcham.

So not only the increased cost of repair, but the hire cars, as previously discussed.

V8

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6451
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 978 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#660610

Postby odysseus2000 » April 20th, 2024, 7:38 pm

Interesting Munro speech on Tesla engineering (27 mins):

https://youtu.be/imZLnvCrf60?si=n3HRCoJ5lPmPF9Oi

Regards,


Return to “Macro and Global Topics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests