Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Anonymous,bruncher,niord,gvonge,Shelford, for Donating to support the site
OIEC or IT?
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 159
- Joined: November 13th, 2016, 5:07 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
OIEC or IT?
On balance I have tended to believe that investment trusts are better than OIECs for various reasons e.g. limit pricing, independent board, gearing, etc. What do others think?
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 5338 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
ivahunch wrote:On balance I have tended to believe that investment trusts are better than OIECs for various reasons e.g. limit pricing, independent board, gearing, etc. What do others think?
It's difficult to be definitive - but mostly I've read that ITs will perform better over a long period. However, my own results suggest only that you shouldn't write off OEICs as they can perform very well.
Like most average conclusions, any given OEIC might perform better than any particular IT one chooses!
Arb.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 16629
- Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
- Has thanked: 4343 times
- Been thanked: 7536 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
ivahunch wrote:On balance I have tended to believe that investment trusts are better than OIECs for various reasons e.g. limit pricing, independent board, gearing, etc. What do others think?
This subject has been fully discussed over the years and of course there are differing views but my feeling is that ITs are the better choice for all the reasons that Arb and you have mentioned plus a few more. In a market sell off, OEIC's have to sell assets to meet redemptions whereas the portfolio of ITs are unaffected. That is an important distinction if the portfolio is holding hard to sell or illiquid assets such as property or private (non quoted) investments. These can mean that trading can be frozen with an OEIC in some circumstances and investors are unable to get their money out. Both of these points have been illustrated in recent years.
But I think it is above all the transparency of the IT structure that I prefer to the OEIC. As to performance, I simply do not know overall. As Arb tells us, some will point to one as being better than the other in different circumstances.
Dod
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2511
- Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
- Has thanked: 2037 times
- Been thanked: 1227 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
There is no universal truth to answer that question. I have good results from holding both funds and investment trusts. By far my best ever investment has been Fundsmith, an OEIC. One thing I particularly like about ITs though is that they are traded in real time where funds aren't. All other things being equal, when choosing a collective investment, that is the deciding factor that would steer me towards an IT over a fund.
I actually think it's pretty unhelpful to make a universal statement that one type of collective investment is always superior to another. It's just not true.
I actually think it's pretty unhelpful to make a universal statement that one type of collective investment is always superior to another. It's just not true.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: December 7th, 2016, 9:09 pm
- Has thanked: 369 times
- Been thanked: 1079 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
While I prefer IT's I'd hesitate to describe them as "better".
Better in what way? If we take general purpose funds/IT's there is some evidence that the ability to borrow "can" over the long term increase returns. However that is subject to survivor bias.
Property funds have been subject to closure as property is relatively liquid, while you can always sell a IT. However is the ability to sell at a bad time a good or bad thing?
Then there is the complexity of discount and premium inherent in IT's. I've known people who avoid them because they just can't accept the concept that they may have to sell at less than par.
I should possibly admit that my costs would go up if I chose OIEC's as my broker caps their fees for other investments.
Better in what way? If we take general purpose funds/IT's there is some evidence that the ability to borrow "can" over the long term increase returns. However that is subject to survivor bias.
Property funds have been subject to closure as property is relatively liquid, while you can always sell a IT. However is the ability to sell at a bad time a good or bad thing?
Then there is the complexity of discount and premium inherent in IT's. I've known people who avoid them because they just can't accept the concept that they may have to sell at less than par.
I should possibly admit that my costs would go up if I chose OIEC's as my broker caps their fees for other investments.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8401
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 4226 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
My recollection is that some funds and ITs had the same manager withthe same objectives. I think M&G may have been one such a good few years ago. The IT tended to outperform the then UT for various reasons, including gearing, discount or premium to NAV, and possibly charges.
TJH
TJH
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: November 23rd, 2019, 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
Hi All.
I'm not sure OEIC vs IT is the right question (though I appreciated it was the one in the original post). I would argue ETF vs IT is (I hold both in roughly equal proportion).
Some of the key considerations
For my purposes, I conclude
Regards, Newroad
* "Authorised Participants" (a market maker or sorts) can create/destroy units if and as needed, but I view them more broadly as nearer closed end
I'm not sure OEIC vs IT is the right question (though I appreciated it was the one in the original post). I would argue ETF vs IT is (I hold both in roughly equal proportion).
Some of the key considerations
- Exchange Tradeable: Yes for IT/ETF, no for OEIC (important for me to be able to exchange trade)
Closed or open ended: Closed for IT, "hybrid*" for ETF, open fr OEIC (important if holding illiquid assets)
Gearing: Yes for IT, Yes for some ETF's, not sure about OEIC's (not a big issue for me - cuts both ways)
Additional Costs (other than broker fees): Jurisiction dependent, but generally Zero for ETF's, Stamp Duty for IT's, Percentage for OEIC's (though not as bad as they used to be, I understand)
For my purposes, I conclude
- ETF's for commodity stuff, e.g. indexes etc
Investment Trusts for specialist stuff, e.g. active management, illiquid underlying instruments etc
Regards, Newroad
* "Authorised Participants" (a market maker or sorts) can create/destroy units if and as needed, but I view them more broadly as nearer closed end
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3090 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
Newroad wrote:Gearing: Yes for IT, Yes for some ETF's, not sure about OEIC's (not a big issue for me - cuts both ways)
I thought not for OEICs and I'm not sure about ETFs ... which do you think have borrowed to invest? Additional differences are:
Discount/premium: Yes for ITs and ETFs. No for OEICs.
Must distribute all dividends: No for ITs. Yes for ETFs and OEICs.
Or to put those the other way:
Always trade at NAV: No for ITs and ETFs. Yes for OEICs
Have a reserve: Yes for ITs. No for ETFs and OEICs.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: November 23rd, 2019, 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
Hi Mc2Fool.
Just search up "Leveraged ETF's" - you'll see there's plenty. I personally wouldn't touch them.
I've just checked - it appears OEIC's cannot leverage
https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/education/2023/03/14/investment-trusts-101-the-key-differences-between-trusts-and-oeics/
The above article also has other useful info for the original poster.
Regards, Newroad
Just search up "Leveraged ETF's" - you'll see there's plenty. I personally wouldn't touch them.
- On the discount/premium, I regard that as a wash, but you are correct to point it out
On the ability to retain some dividends, that is a good point - some people may particularly like the smoothing/reliability effect
I've just checked - it appears OEIC's cannot leverage
https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/education/2023/03/14/investment-trusts-101-the-key-differences-between-trusts-and-oeics/
The above article also has other useful info for the original poster.
Regards, Newroad
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 9:37 am
- Has thanked: 485 times
- Been thanked: 1502 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
mc2fool wrote:Newroad wrote:Gearing: Yes for IT, Yes for some ETF's, not sure about OEIC's (not a big issue for me - cuts both ways)
I thought not for OEICs and I'm not sure about ETFs ... which do you think have borrowed to invest? Additional differences are:
I assume Newroad is referring to leveraged index ETFs that are geared by a multiple of the underlying index. L&G do a 2x FTSE100 index ETF for example.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 19263
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 650 times
- Been thanked: 6841 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
mc2fool wrote:Discount/premium: Yes for ITs and ETFs. No for OEICs.
Always trade at NAV: No for ITs and ETFs. Yes for OEICs
ETFs can of course trade at a premium or discount to NAV. But it is unusual for that to significantly happen with major market index ETFs from the big providers like Vanguard and iShares. It is more likely with more narrowly defined ETFs or those that operate in illiquid markets. Or in the occasional and temporary so-called "flash crashes".
So on discounts and premiums I would not lump ETFs in with ITs. They are perhaps somewhere in the middle between ITs and OEICs, and most investors should not need to worry about it if they choose wisely.
ETNs, as opposed to ETFs, should not have premium or discount at all, since the return is contractually guaranteed to be identical with the underlying index. However they are credit instruments and so you are exposed to issuer credit risk, not that I know anyone has lost money on them for that reason.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3090 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
Newroad wrote:Hi Mc2Fool.
Just search up "Leveraged ETF's" - you'll see there's plenty. I personally wouldn't touch them.
Well ok, yes, but not really the same as "gearing" for ITs which is effected by borrowing to buy more of the underlying.
Leveraged ETFs, AIUI, don't hold any of the underlying stocks of the index they're leveraging but rather a pile of derivatives. Hmmm...ok, there may be debt in margins, etc. But still, kinda different to IT gearing...
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: November 23rd, 2019, 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
Hi Mc2Fool.
I would have thought that a 2X Leveraged FTSE 100 ETF (as cited above by Simoan) would perform* similarly, if not exactly the same, as an Investment Trust or similar borrowing 100% of equity and investing the now "200%" in the basket of shares which represents the FTSE 100.
Indeed, if the provider of the ETF is not doing so naked, then one presumes that is what they are doing themselves, directly or indirectly.
However, I am not an expert in such things and as noted, have no personal stake in such ETF's, so I could be wrong.
Regards, Newroad
* there are of course frictional costs, potential margin calls etc - this is intended in the broadest sense
I would have thought that a 2X Leveraged FTSE 100 ETF (as cited above by Simoan) would perform* similarly, if not exactly the same, as an Investment Trust or similar borrowing 100% of equity and investing the now "200%" in the basket of shares which represents the FTSE 100.
Indeed, if the provider of the ETF is not doing so naked, then one presumes that is what they are doing themselves, directly or indirectly.
However, I am not an expert in such things and as noted, have no personal stake in such ETF's, so I could be wrong.
Regards, Newroad
* there are of course frictional costs, potential margin calls etc - this is intended in the broadest sense
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3574
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
- Has thanked: 2386 times
- Been thanked: 1951 times
Re: OIEC or IT?
I have had a look at a few popular Global ITs and OEICs which I have held for a number of years, and also a Global Tracker ETF.
As others have mentioned, it can be more expensive to hold an OEIC in Hargreaves Lansdown than an IT or ETF. So some years ago I switched from an OEIC to an IT - both UK Equity investments managed by Nick Train. And the result?
My personal view is that there is no clear advantage between ITs and OEICs as investment vehicles.
All data has been taken from Hargreaves Lansdown. Please let me know if I have introduced any errors.
As others have mentioned, it can be more expensive to hold an OEIC in Hargreaves Lansdown than an IT or ETF. So some years ago I switched from an OEIC to an IT - both UK Equity investments managed by Nick Train. And the result?
My personal view is that there is no clear advantage between ITs and OEICs as investment vehicles.
All data has been taken from Hargreaves Lansdown. Please let me know if I have introduced any errors.
Return to “Investment Strategies”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 21 guests