Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site
Beating the World Index
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Beating the World Index
So, here's the thing: I am struggling lately to beat the FTSE all world total return index over year to date and 1 year.
My portfolio:
Total return 1 year 0.6 lower than all world
Total return year to date 0.7 lower than all world
Total return 2 years 5.6 higher than all world.
I am considering moving over to ishares Global Factor ETFs (which on past performance outperform the parent index) as core portfolio holdings with some specialist ETFs as satellites as and when, for a bit of spice.
This would be much simpler to keep an eye on, than the 48 rag bag of investments I currently own: the old grey matter is starting to shrink.
Daft idea or cunnng plan?
My portfolio:
Total return 1 year 0.6 lower than all world
Total return year to date 0.7 lower than all world
Total return 2 years 5.6 higher than all world.
I am considering moving over to ishares Global Factor ETFs (which on past performance outperform the parent index) as core portfolio holdings with some specialist ETFs as satellites as and when, for a bit of spice.
This would be much simpler to keep an eye on, than the 48 rag bag of investments I currently own: the old grey matter is starting to shrink.
Daft idea or cunnng plan?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8289
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 919 times
- Been thanked: 4138 times
Re: Beating the World Index
Apologies if you have posted it already, but what are your present investments?
TJH
TJH
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 7:41 am
- Has thanked: 763 times
- Been thanked: 1179 times
Re: Beating the World Index
And sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but in what currency do you want to do so?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 705 times
- Been thanked: 1558 times
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Beating the World Index
tjh290633 wrote:Apologies if you have posted it already, but what are your present investments?
TJH
Mixed: 70% equities, 20% fixed income, 10% property
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Beating the World Index
TUK020 wrote:And sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but in what currency do you want to do so?
Sterling
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 11:16 am
- Has thanked: 675 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: Beating the World Index
bobsmydog wrote:So, here's the thing: I am struggling lately to beat the FTSE all world total return index over year to date and 1 year.
I imagine the same happens to the very best investors. However, isn't a year too short a period to worry about? The long-term comparison is key. If you achieve, for example, a total return CAGR of 9% compared to an index's 8.5% then that difference will become pronounced over time as compounding works its magic. And it could well be that for some years you do much worse than the index.
Best wishes
Mark.
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Beating the World Index
ADrunkenMarcus wrote:bobsmydog wrote:So, here's the thing: I am struggling lately to beat the FTSE all world total return index over year to date and 1 year.
I imagine the same happens to the very best investors. However, isn't a year too short a period to worry about? The long-term comparison is key. If you achieve, for example, a total return CAGR of 9% compared to an index's 8.5% then that difference will become pronounced over time as compounding works its magic. And it could well be that for some years you do much worse than the index.
Best wishes
Mark.
Yes very true, but quite a lot of work has gone into this lack lustre performance so I am now wondering whether it is worth the effort.
Maybe I can get the same returns in the future by plonking everything into global ETFs (as the older I get the muddled I get).
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8289
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 919 times
- Been thanked: 4138 times
Re: Beating the World Index
bobsmydog wrote:tjh290633 wrote:Apologies if you have posted it already, but what are your present investments?
TJH
Mixed: 70% equities, 20% fixed income, 10% property
And what form do they take? Equities, ITs, funds?
Why do you think that switching to ETFs will improve things?
TJH
Re: Beating the World Index
I'm assuming you comparing your entire portfolio against a global equity index. If your portfolio is like mine then fixed interest investments have done poorly with the threat of increased interest rates.
Perhaps just comparing the equity part of your portfolio against a global equity tracker might be better.
Also, the US has had a far stronger equity market compared to everything else recently, so the higher your US exposure, the better you will have done. I think most global trackers will be 50% US exposure but I bet your portfolio is less than that.
Perhaps just comparing the equity part of your portfolio against a global equity tracker might be better.
Also, the US has had a far stronger equity market compared to everything else recently, so the higher your US exposure, the better you will have done. I think most global trackers will be 50% US exposure but I bet your portfolio is less than that.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 663
- Joined: December 10th, 2016, 7:16 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: Beating the World Index
Seems like to beat the World index these days you only need to buy one of these new Factor Funds ETFs as discussed here https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=11351
why not improve your chances and just buy them all?
why not improve your chances and just buy them all?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2509
- Joined: January 15th, 2017, 9:20 am
- Has thanked: 696 times
- Been thanked: 1008 times
Re: Beating the World Index
Erm, doesn't investing in a basket of factor funds mean you get the index fund, just at higher cost?
If the OP thinks he has an 'edge' to beat the index funds, then finding a factor fund that matches that edge will save a lot of effort, which sounds a good idea it its becoming a chore.
If the OP thinks he has an 'edge' to beat the index funds, then finding a factor fund that matches that edge will save a lot of effort, which sounds a good idea it its becoming a chore.
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Beating the World Index
tjh290633 wrote:bobsmydog wrote:tjh290633 wrote:Apologies if you have posted it already, but what are your present investments?
TJH
Mixed: 70% equities, 20% fixed income, 10% property
And what form do they take? Equities, ITs, funds?
Why do you think that switching to ETFs will improve things?
TJH
Funds, ETFs and REITs
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Beating the World Index
Wmnr wrote:I'm assuming you comparing your entire portfolio against a global equity index. If your portfolio is like mine then fixed interest investments have done poorly with the threat of increased interest rates.
Perhaps just comparing the equity part of your portfolio against a global equity tracker might be better.
Also, the US has had a far stronger equity market compared to everything else recently, so the higher your US exposure, the better you will have done. I think most global trackers will be 50% US exposure but I bet your portfolio is less than that.
Yes I am comparing whole portfolio which has taken a hit from fixed interest.
I suppose what I am wondering is whether a global ETF approach would offer just as good a risk/reward as a mixed portfolio. (Coupled with a bit of moving in and out of cash as and when.)
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 450
- Joined: April 13th, 2017, 11:37 am
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: Beating the World Index
bobsmydog wrote:
Yes I am comparing whole portfolio which has taken a hit from fixed interest.
The fixed interest is presumably there to remove volatility from the portfolio and the acknowledged cost of that is worse average performance.
Wouldn't it make more sense to benchmark the performance of the equity part of the portfolio with the world index, and accept that if you want the insurance of carrying some fixed interest then you've got to pay for it in the form of a drag on whole portfolio returns?
It seems almost as if you're grumbling that your portfolio (which is lower risk which implies an expectation of lower return) is offering lower returns than a 100% equity portfolio?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 705 times
- Been thanked: 1558 times
Re: Beating the World Index
JohnB wrote:Erm, doesn't investing in a basket of factor funds mean you get the index fund, just at higher cost?
No, they don't aggregate that way.
Factor investing assumes historical ways of investing will continue to have an edge over the market. They might, but I suspect that if factor investing becomes too popular it will simply destroy any long term factor premium. A problem with factor investing is that it does cost more than simple whole of market trackers, both in fees and internal transaction charges, so the factor funds have to cover those extra costs before being able to beat the market funds.
Another problem is that although factor investing does appear to have beaten the market in the long term, it does not necessarily do that over the short term. As an example, minimum volatility is supposed to beat the market over the long term, but I have been invested in USMV (ishares US min vol ETF) since 2012, but that has underperformed the S&P since purchase. Even US small caps have underperformed the S&P 500 over the last 5 years (but not over 10).
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 705 times
- Been thanked: 1558 times
Re: Beating the World Index
xeny wrote:bobsmydog wrote:
Yes I am comparing whole portfolio which has taken a hit from fixed interest.
The fixed interest is presumably there to remove volatility from the portfolio and the acknowledged cost of that is worse average performance.
Wouldn't it make more sense to benchmark the performance of the equity part of the portfolio with the world index, and accept that if you want the insurance of carrying some fixed interest then you've got to pay for it in the form of a drag on whole portfolio returns?
It seems almost as if you're grumbling that your portfolio (which is lower risk which implies an expectation of lower return) is offering lower returns than a 100% equity portfolio?
The equity part of the portfolio is not necessarily the same risk as a world equity index, but I agree it would make more sense to benchmark separately.
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 73
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Beating the World Index
Thanks everyone for your thoughts.
You are so right - I was comparing apples with oranges so have since compared my portfolio with Vanguard life strategy 80% and am doing rather well now I guess this is because my equity part is generally on the high risk/return side.
Still tempted to move towards a simpler approach, and so progressing those thoughts:
Interesting to see risk profile of Vanguard 80% equity is level 4 which is the same as Vanguard Global Momentum factor with quite different returns but that thought is for another day, another thread I guess.
You are so right - I was comparing apples with oranges so have since compared my portfolio with Vanguard life strategy 80% and am doing rather well now I guess this is because my equity part is generally on the high risk/return side.
Still tempted to move towards a simpler approach, and so progressing those thoughts:
Interesting to see risk profile of Vanguard 80% equity is level 4 which is the same as Vanguard Global Momentum factor with quite different returns but that thought is for another day, another thread I guess.
Return to “Investment Strategies”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests