Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site
Some great photos of London found in attic
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1324 times
- Been thanked: 3695 times
Some great photos of London found in attic
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-43782267
I found these photos really interesting. London in the late 50s early 60s looking so different...and some earlier shots too from the 1930s.
Some really fantastic almost Cartier-Bresson type shots.
I was strangely fascinated by the hardware store showing all the goods displayed outside...it must have taken ages to set up the display ever day like that.
John
I found these photos really interesting. London in the late 50s early 60s looking so different...and some earlier shots too from the 1930s.
Some really fantastic almost Cartier-Bresson type shots.
I was strangely fascinated by the hardware store showing all the goods displayed outside...it must have taken ages to set up the display ever day like that.
John
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
Yes. I particularly liked the one 'Passing in the street, London, 1956'. One of my first thoughts was: "Couldn't take that with a digital camera!"
Forgive me if I am wrong there. I am not a photographer and only have an oldish and very simple digital camera.
Forgive me if I am wrong there. I am not a photographer and only have an oldish and very simple digital camera.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1324 times
- Been thanked: 3695 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
XFool wrote:Yes. I particularly liked the one 'Passing in the street, London, 1956'. One of my first thoughts was: "Couldn't take that with a digital camera!"
Forgive me if I am wrong there. I am not a photographer and only have an oldish and very simple digital camera.
It is a very striking photo but I'm not sure why you think it could not be taken with a digital camera. What do you see as the problem?
John
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6385
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1882 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 4:20 pm
- Has thanked: 1899 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
AleisterCrowley wrote:I'm wondering how the car in Howland St got crushed!
Yes, and it doesn't look like it would have ended well for any occupants...
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6385
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1882 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
Something fell of the Post Office Tower (and went back in time 6 years or more....)
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
redsturgeon wrote:XFool wrote:Yes. I particularly liked the one 'Passing in the street, London, 1956'. One of my first thoughts was: "Couldn't take that with a digital camera!"
Forgive me if I am wrong there. I am not a photographer and only have an oldish and very simple digital camera.
It is a very striking photo but I'm not sure why you think it could not be taken with a digital camera. What do you see as the problem?
So called 'shutter delay' - the really dreadful thing about digital cameras. How do you take a photo at an instant with a simple digital camera?
Maybe the technology has moved on, also as I said I am not a photographer and don't have a 'proper' camera, but with mine I could never take a live photograph of a moment.
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 181
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 8:06 am
- Has thanked: 109 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
I had an older version Nikon Coolpix some 15 years ago and found the same thing - from switching the camera on to waiting for the lens to settle down (moving in and out) took what seemed like an age and the moment was gone.
However, I now have the latest Coolpix and it can be switched on and ready to shoot in under a second.
However, I now have the latest Coolpix and it can be switched on and ready to shoot in under a second.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
BBLSP1 wrote:I had an older version Nikon Coolpix some 15 years ago and found the same thing - from switching the camera on to waiting for the lens to settle down (moving in and out) took what seemed like an age and the moment was gone.
However, I now have the latest Coolpix and it can be switched on and ready to shoot in under a second.
We are talking at cross purposes here.
I am talking of a simple, consumer type, 'ordinary' digital camera of 10 - 15 years ago (6 Mpixel resolution). The problem then (now?) with ALL those cameras was 'shutter delay'. Press the 'shutter' button, image was eventually captured several tens to hundred or so milliseconds later.
Still life - AOK. Real, living, moving life - forget about it!
(To my non photographic but technical mind, major component of the problem came from the standardisation on the use of a 'zoom' rather than fixed focus lenses in ordinary consumer cameras and how this was dealt with in the camera firmware. In which case, by my guess, the later period equivalent non 'digital' film cameras could have suffered from a similar problem.)
Obviously, camera start up with an electronic camera is a serious additional problem as you explain. My point is, even if the camera is on and pointing, you still have (had?) an inherent problem.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7988
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 3658 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
XFool wrote:(To my non photographic but technical mind, major component of the problem came from the standardisation on the use of a 'zoom' rather than fixed focus lenses in ordinary consumer cameras and how this was dealt with in the camera firmware. In which case, by my guess, the later period equivalent non 'digital' film cameras could have suffered from a similar problem.)
I think you're mixing up "fixed focus" and "fixed focal length". Cameras that don't need to focus are either simple or niche in my experience.
And fixed focal length cameras still need to be focused, so zoom is a red herring.
In short, old digital cameras had the problem you refer to, decent current ones tend not to.
Scott.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
swill453 wrote:XFool wrote:(To my non photographic but technical mind, major component of the problem came from the standardisation on the use of a 'zoom' rather than fixed focus lenses in ordinary consumer cameras and how this was dealt with in the camera firmware. In which case, by my guess, the later period equivalent non 'digital' film cameras could have suffered from a similar problem.)
I think you're mixing up "fixed focus" and "fixed focal length".
I don't think I am, though that depends on exactly how these cameras operate.
swill453 wrote:And fixed focal length cameras still need to be focused, so zoom is a red herring.
I don't believe it is (was?). (In my judgement it was a major contributor to the 'shutter delay' I experienced.)
swill453 wrote:In short, old digital cameras had the problem you refer to, decent current ones tend not to.
That's good to know - hoping it applies to cheap ordinary consumer cameras, as used by non photographers.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1324 times
- Been thanked: 3695 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
XFool wrote:redsturgeon wrote:XFool wrote:Yes. I particularly liked the one 'Passing in the street, London, 1956'. One of my first thoughts was: "Couldn't take that with a digital camera!"
Forgive me if I am wrong there. I am not a photographer and only have an oldish and very simple digital camera.
It is a very striking photo but I'm not sure why you think it could not be taken with a digital camera. What do you see as the problem?
So called 'shutter delay' - the really dreadful thing about digital cameras. How do you take a photo at an instant with a simple digital camera?
Maybe the technology has moved on, also as I said I am not a photographer and don't have a 'proper' camera, but with mine I could never take a live photograph of a moment.
Aha, now I understand.
It's a long time since I shot with a cheap camera but I do remember what you are referring to.
I only shoot with a DSLR these days and the shutter has no delay, so capturing the "decisive moment" is not a problem (well at least not a camera problem).
John
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6139
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1589 times
- Been thanked: 1801 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
AleisterCrowley wrote:I'm wondering how the car in Howland St got crushed!
I wondered that as well. It was fine, earlier in 1958, before it was flown over. Probably dropped from an aircraft or similar:
https://repository.library.northeastern ... neu:133860
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2156
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 288 times
- Been thanked: 282 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
"The woman collecting for PDSA..." from 1955, interesting record sleeves in the window. Top one is Johnny Mathis's EP, which is actually from 1957...
https://eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=565411
Below it looks like "Latin Picnic", I think...
https://eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=565411
Below it looks like "Latin Picnic", I think...
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2156
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 288 times
- Been thanked: 282 times
Re: Some great photos of London found in attic
Of all the photography hobbyists, none have any interest in forensic work.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests