Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site

Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

Scientific discovery and discussion
1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4513
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 720 times
Been thanked: 1405 times

Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

#537050

Postby 1nvest » October 13th, 2022, 5:57 pm

1nvest wrote:£20Bn might be enough to build sufficient wind turbines and liquid air energy storage facilities to cover almost all of UK homes power needs. And push come to shove could see the 2030 time date being pulled down to perhaps 2026. And doesn't create a demand for minerals which may become increasingly scarce, other than the rising demand for the likes of electric vehicles.

In addition to the Manchester plant, another multiples larger plant build is underway in Yorkshire and with another 16 seemingly planned across the UK https://highviewpower.com/plants/
Highview Power’s second commercial renewable energy power station in the UK is a 200MW/2.5GWh facility in Yorkshire. This is the first of 18 sites for UK wide deployment strategically located to benefit from the existing transmission infrastructure.

1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4513
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 720 times
Been thanked: 1405 times

Re: Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

#537085

Postby 1nvest » October 13th, 2022, 8:20 pm

1nvest wrote:
1nvest wrote:£20Bn might be enough to build sufficient wind turbines and liquid air energy storage facilities to cover almost all of UK homes power needs. And push come to shove could see the 2030 time date being pulled down to perhaps 2026. And doesn't create a demand for minerals which may become increasingly scarce, other than the rising demand for the likes of electric vehicles.

In addition to the Manchester plant, another multiples larger plant build is underway in Yorkshire and with another 16 seemingly planned across the UK https://highviewpower.com/plants/
Highview Power’s second commercial renewable energy power station in the UK is a 200MW/2.5GWh facility in Yorkshire. This is the first of 18 sites for UK wide deployment strategically located to benefit from the existing transmission infrastructure.

I believe there are more East side UK wind farms than windier and more productive West side, primarily due to National Grid injection/structure reasons. Whilst that grid could be extended to better accommodate feeding the national grid more from the West side, another benefit of liquid air based storage is its portability. From the earlier link ...
ability to capture, store and shift energy wherever it is needed. Our plants can be co-located with wind or solar – or they can operate as a standalone.

Or even on the more remote most northerly islands of the British Isles. If a wind farm is co-located with a liquid air storage site then that captured energy could even be transported via ship rather than having to run electric cabling to the locations. As might a liquid-air site on say Iceland facilitate transportation of geo-therm based energy via ship to the UK rather than through the existing/planned electric cabling between UK and Iceland. Maybe with the ships being electric driven - powered by wind/air :)

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6461
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1569 times
Been thanked: 980 times

Re: Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

#537233

Postby odysseus2000 » October 14th, 2022, 11:22 am

For those interested in liquid air storage this is an interesting introduction (12 mins):

https://youtu.be/yb1Nuk3_t_4

If we consider that of order £200b would make for a good level of energy storage for the UK with 65 million population that is of order 200000/65 approx £3k per person for a system that is likely capable of running for 20 years. This seems a very affordable solution.

If we were to want to move from gas domestic heating to heat pumps there would need to be a big additional spend to insulate all the uk housing stock, but ensuring the lights stay on & we use the abundant free fuel renewables sensibly, spending on tech like fusion that has so far been a failure looks less reasonable.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6461
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1569 times
Been thanked: 980 times

Re: Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

#537244

Postby odysseus2000 » October 14th, 2022, 11:40 am

An alternative to liquid air is liquid co2 which is lower cost due to not needing the refrigeration phase (14 mins):

https://youtu.be/tPHkCbeQNxI

Regards,

BullDog
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2486
Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
Has thanked: 2006 times
Been thanked: 1213 times

Re: Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

#537254

Postby BullDog » October 14th, 2022, 12:05 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:An alternative to liquid air is liquid co2 which is lower cost due to not needing the refrigeration phase (14 mins):

https://youtu.be/tPHkCbeQNxI

Regards,

In a similar vein, compressed air energy storage -

http://storelectric.com/

Looks promising, but first plant is yet to be built.

BullDog
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2486
Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
Has thanked: 2006 times
Been thanked: 1213 times

Re: Energy Storage Thread split of from Fusion Thread

#537255

Postby BullDog » October 14th, 2022, 12:07 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:For those interested in liquid air storage this is an interesting introduction (12 mins):

https://youtu.be/yb1Nuk3_t_4

If we consider that of order £200b would make for a good level of energy storage for the UK with 65 million population that is of order 200000/65 approx £3k per person for a system that is likely capable of running for 20 years. This seems a very affordable solution.

If we were to want to move from gas domestic heating to heat pumps there would need to be a big additional spend to insulate all the uk housing stock, but ensuring the lights stay on & we use the abundant free fuel renewables sensibly, spending on tech like fusion that has so far been a failure looks less reasonable.

Regards,

It's very interesting technology. Nothing novel about it. It's basically the first half of an air separation plant. Decades old technology and very reliable.


Return to “Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests