Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

Straight answers to factual questions
Forum rules
Direct questions and answers, this room is not for general discussion please
AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101593

Postby AleisterCrowley » December 4th, 2017, 9:02 pm

I need to buy some smoke alarms for a relative who lives in a medium size apartment
What are the pros and cons of optical/ionisation alarms?

Breelander
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4179
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
Has thanked: 1001 times
Been thanked: 1855 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101619

Postby Breelander » December 4th, 2017, 9:58 pm


AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101622

Postby AleisterCrowley » December 4th, 2017, 10:04 pm

I just found that after some trawling -thanks
At the bottom it says "UK Fire Service Resources recommends Safelincs Safety Products" which I thought was odd. Can public services promote a single manufacturer/supplier (complete with link to their website)?

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18889
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 636 times
Been thanked: 6657 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101623

Postby Lootman » December 4th, 2017, 10:05 pm

I prefer the combined smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and, back when I was a landlord, used them exclusively in my housing units.

Also, and importantly, I used both mains power and battery backup. Some better ones even have a capacitor that provides power if both fail.

It's not something to economise on, in my opinion. The real test was when I was operating a petrol driven angle grinder to cut through a concrete floor to install a drain and the detector went off. No heat, no smoke and it still saw the danger. Impressive.

Of course, I just disconnected it and carried on . . . :D

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101626

Postby AleisterCrowley » December 4th, 2017, 10:14 pm

I'm looking at the combined ones for my mum, but aforementioned relative doesn't have any CO sources around -electric cooker and no central heating (it's very hot where she is...)

PinkDalek
Lemon Half
Posts: 6139
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
Has thanked: 1589 times
Been thanked: 1801 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101639

Postby PinkDalek » December 4th, 2017, 10:36 pm

AleisterCrowley wrote:I just found that after some trawling -thanks
At the bottom it says "UK Fire Service Resources recommends Safelincs Safety Products" which I thought was odd. Can public services promote a single manufacturer/supplier (complete with link to their website)?


That isn’t a fire brigade or fire and rescue service.

From elsewhere on the website:

We are an unofficial website set up by serving and retired members of the UK Fire and Rescue Service

They were incorporated as recently as 3 April 2017:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... ng-history

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101647

Postby AleisterCrowley » December 4th, 2017, 11:03 pm

Aha, that makes more sense - I would hope the advice therein is correct

PinkDalek
Lemon Half
Posts: 6139
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
Has thanked: 1589 times
Been thanked: 1801 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101663

Postby PinkDalek » December 4th, 2017, 11:50 pm


csearle
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4829
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 4855 times
Been thanked: 2118 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101670

Postby csearle » December 5th, 2017, 12:48 am

I used to work on optical smoke detectors at Siemens in Muenchen, they had ceased production of all their ionization ones in favour of optical smoke detectors by the time I started there. Not sure why this was, maybe the undesirable-ness of having radioactive material in their products? Anyway, I suspect that optical ones are of a more modern design. They do need to be washed occasionally though! Yes, you heard it here first, :) We (i.e. Siemens) had a scheduled smoke detector washing cycle for larger customers where the labyrinth in them was washed of dust particles to minimize unwanted light reflections. :)

Cheers,
Chris

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101728

Postby AleisterCrowley » December 5th, 2017, 9:03 am

Thanks Chris
From a brief trawl of various sites it looks like optical detectors are the preferred type currently
As you say, may be down to worries around the Americium-241m in the ionisation detctors

didds
Lemon Half
Posts: 5294
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 3287 times
Been thanked: 1029 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101739

Postby didds » December 5th, 2017, 9:28 am

AleisterCrowley wrote:I just found that after some trawling -thanks
At the bottom it says "UK Fire Service Resources recommends Safelincs Safety Products" which I thought was odd. Can public services promote a single manufacturer/supplier (complete with link to their website)?



I strongly suspect that "www.fireservice.co.uk" is not an official site from the UK fire service which I wold imagine would have a gov.uk domain.

A whois lookup shows the registrant as using a privacy service, and the address is in Slough. Its DNS is delegated to tsohost.co.uk which provdies domain etc services.

Doesn't sound at all official to me.

UPDATE: Sorry - everybody else beat me to it!

didds

fuiseog
Posts: 31
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 4:22 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101860

Postby fuiseog » December 5th, 2017, 6:41 pm

I contacted my local fire service for advice. They said they provided smoke detectors free, and 2 firemen came out, looked over the house deciding we only needed 3, installed them and left.

I've forgotten what type they are, but they have 10 year batteries and when the batteries run out we replace the alarms.

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smoke Alarms - optical vs. ionisation

#101898

Postby AleisterCrowley » December 5th, 2017, 9:47 pm

Sounds like the lithium ones - umming an aahing over these or the ones with replaceable alkaline bats.
My relative lives overseas (about 3500 miles east ) so local fire brigade not an option!!


Return to “Does anyone know?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests