Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Anonymous,bruncher,niord,gvonge,Shelford, for Donating to support the site

Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

The home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
9873210
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1026
Joined: December 9th, 2016, 6:44 am
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471049

Postby 9873210 » January 7th, 2022, 1:51 am

There are currently 10 vaccines approved by WHO.

Sputnik is not one of them. The Russians either can't or won't live up to international norms.

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6491
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1572 times
Been thanked: 983 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471096

Postby odysseus2000 » January 7th, 2022, 11:27 am

9873210 wrote:There are currently 10 vaccines approved by WHO.

Sputnik is not one of them. The Russians either can't or won't live up to international norms.


Interesting to read some of the reasons for the non-approval:

https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/11/1 ... -pub-85783

According to this the death rate in Russia from Covid is one of the highest:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 7321002810

Estimating excess deaths rates based on the trend-adjusted average, Russia had the highest excess mortality of any of the 37 countries considered. Using the simple average, Russia had the third highest. Most of the excess deaths were recorded in the 4th quarter of 2020...

Super interesting albeit terribly sad for the Russian people. Thank you for the comments that encouraged me to look at this.

Regards,

Hallucigenia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2749
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 3:03 am
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 1830 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471102

Postby Hallucigenia » January 7th, 2022, 12:07 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:pushing some pre-determined ideas irrespective of what the science is...

the majority of folk live at home much longer than they would like because of the cost of rent or mortgages. If this is correct the lack of large O in older generations seems to me to be a huge blessing.


It seems you are pushing your pre-determined ideas irrespective of what the facts are - at a UK level, only about a quarter of 20-34 year-olds are living with their parents, and I'd suggest that the people who were catching omicron at the hedge-fund Christmas party I linked above, can probably afford to rent a flat.

And if you look at the stats, it has spread from the 20-somethings to the older generation since Christmas.

odysseus2000 wrote:I don't understand a lot of medical practices. I have been told for years that antibiotics have to be targeted against the microbes causing the trouble, but when my Father was in hospital I asked if they had taken swabs and used selective antibiotics. No, we just use a broad spectrum, like domestos.


There's always tradeoffs - in some situations you can either be fairly confident that you only have a threat from 1 particular bug, or you have the time to send away samples to a lab to find out what they are in order to customise the treatment. In other situations you may face multiple threats, or the patient needs immediate treatment and there isn't time to get a lab to process some samples, so you just hit it with whatever you've got. Or is the real world too complicated for a physicist?

odysseus2000 wrote: So I suppose the lack of consideration of what variation of Covid a patient has and the best medicine is just how they operate at patient level.


You have to remember that omicron is the first variant to show significant immune differences that might affect antibody treatments - and we hadn't heard of it 6 weeks ago. It's only since Christmas that the idea of tweaking treatments based on variant has really emerged - this stuff is changing fast. And whilst we don't have a huge repertoire of treatments for Covid, most of them are independent of what variant it is.

odysseus2000 wrote:the CMO and CSO have decided that everyone should be triple vaccinated, no matter what the science says


The science on boosters seems pretty consistent, eg the latest UKHSA report has hospitalisations being halved at 25 weeks after 2 jabs, whereas the vaccine effectiveness of a booster against hospitalisation is 88%.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... df#page=11

odysseus2000 wrote:a lot of the arguments rely around modelling by the Imperial Group under Niel Ferguson whose record on accurate predictions is lamentable.


Citation needed. Actually Imperial's modelling hasn't been too far off - the media have seized on some of their extreme cases, but the UK has followed something that's looked roughly like their "plausible worst-case with restrictions" case.

odysseus2000 wrote:It seems likely that if there had not been a rebellion by the backbenchers on the last commons vote that the UK would have been locked down.


I'm not sure about that, but I would note that with 18k in hospital we're now putting more pressure on hospitals than during the full lockdown in November 2020, at a worse time of year for them. Something like a modified version of Tier 3 for the second half of December would have made a significant difference, with a looser allowance for Christmas Day subject to testing.

odysseus2000 wrote: In more recent times all UK honey bees were plagued with varroa mites and it was said we were stuck with them forever, there would be no more ferrel bees and without treatment every UK hive would die. Most bee keepers including myself treated, but a few didn't. Now varroa seems to have gone and there are ferrel bees above one of my bay windows.


Varroa is far from gone, in fact there was new legislation to cover it only last year, the Bee Diseases and Pests Control Order 2021.

odysseus2000 wrote:it seems to me that the booster and the other vaccines after it do not currently have much scientific justification and carry


You keep making assertions like that with no basis. As I say, I suggest you start with the UKHSA reports.

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6491
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1572 times
Been thanked: 983 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471299

Postby odysseus2000 » January 7th, 2022, 10:17 pm

Hallucigenia

It seems you are pushing your pre-determined ideas irrespective of what the facts are - at a UK level, only about a quarter of 20-34 year-olds are living with their parents, and I'd suggest that the people who were catching omicron at the hedge-fund Christmas party I linked above, can probably afford to rent a flat.


And if you look at the stats, it has spread from the 20-somethings to the older generation since Christmas.

From the same reference:
Over the last two decades there has been a 46.3% increase in the number of young people aged 20 to 34 years (non-dependent children) living with their parents…
As i noted the number of non-dependent adults (20-34) has increased by 42% to as you noted 1/4. 1/4 is enough if O is as contagious as advertised to have a lot of older people infected, but either it isn’t happening or the illness is so mild that it is not thought worth bothering about. Sure it might increase but if you are going to argue that most young people don’t live with their parents and then say that the numbers are now increasing there is some flaw in that analysis.

Hallucigenia
There’s always tradeoffs - in some situations you can either be fairly confident that you only have a threat from 1 particular bug, or you have the time to send away samples to a lab to find out what they are in order to customise the treatment. In other situations you may face multiple threats, or the patient needs immediate treatment and there isn't time to get a lab to process some samples, so you just hit it with whatever you've got. Or is the real world too complicated for a physicist?


In the example I cited the clinicians took samples and then either didn’t get the tests done or ignored the results and went for the domestos kill all anti biotic mixture. It seems the real world and all its marvellous technology is too complicated for clinicians.

Hallucigenia
You have to remember that omicron is the first variant to show significant immune differences that might affect antibody treatments - and we hadn't heard of it 6 weeks ago. It's only since Christmas that the idea of tweaking treatments based on variant has really emerged - this stuff is changing fast. And whilst we don't have a huge repertoire of treatments for Covid, most of them are independent of what variant it is.


I don’t follow this at all. If O is much weaker than previous then why would clinicians not use different approaches and as far as I understand it the anti-virals are variant dependent, but if I am wrong, please correct.

[Hallucigenia]The science on boosters seems pretty consistent, eg the latest UKHSA report has hospitalisations being halved at 25 weeks after 2 jabs, whereas the vaccine effectiveness of a booster against hospitalisation is 88%.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... df#page=11


This is another weird one. At one moment you are arguing that we hadn’t heard of O 6 weeks ago and you are now linking to data that shows lack of vaccine effectiveness after 25 weeks. This means that these lack of effectiveness graphs have to be simulations or at best extrapolations, but can’t be real data unless I am missing something.


Hallucigenia
Citation needed. Actually Imperial's modelling hasn't been too far off - the media have seized on some of their extreme cases, but the UK has followed something that's looked roughly like their "plausible worst-case with restrictions" case.


There are many articles, see for example:

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/ ... -this-guy/

Hallucigenia

I'm not sure about that, but I would note that with 18k in hospital we're now putting more pressure on hospitals than during the full lockdown in November 2020, at a worse time of year for them. Something like a modified version of Tier 3 for the second half of December would have made a significant difference, with a looser allowance for Christmas Day subject to testing.


This is pure speculation, no one knows but had the lockdowns as many in the medical authorities and Sage wanted, there would have been a severe hit to the economy.

Hallucigenia

Varroa is far from gone, in fact there was new legislation to cover it only last year, the Bee Diseases and Pests Control Order 2021.


Typing as a bee keeper with a dozen hives I can tell you that we are seeing no natural varroa drop nor any drop after treatment. This compares to a few years ago when there was a large natural mite drop and massive numbers after treatments. For the moment varroa has gone away. Why is far from clear, but there are suggestions that the honey bee learned how to cleanse itself of varroa.

Hallucigenia
You keep making assertions like that with no basis. As I say, I suggest you start with the UKHSA reports.


It is upto the CMO, CSO to present the data that you refer to but they are not doing so and are instead using fear as a method to convince people to take the vaccine and boosters, statement likes 80% of people in ICU have had no vaccine and then not trying to break that down into D and O or take into account the South African data etc etc. This kind of health information by the folk at the top of the system is unbecoming of a banana republic, let alone a g7 nation. One is seeing similar across many European nations, particularly France and the situation in Australia with the effective arrest of a leading tennis player is like something out of Monte Python. Sure they have got away with the fear message for a while now, but it is no longer compelling and in the process they are undermining the science. The situation is very fluid and uncertain and for the CMO et al to keep banging on with the same tactics that were used when ignorance was high in the early stages of this viral war is absurd.

Regards,,

MrFoolish
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2438
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 7:27 pm
Has thanked: 582 times
Been thanked: 1176 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471351

Postby MrFoolish » January 8th, 2022, 11:32 am

A question for one and all.

Once we are on the downslope of infections, and we know the pressure is off the health service, will you continue to worry about covid or is it time to return to normal life?

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 8024
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 999 times
Been thanked: 3675 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471354

Postby swill453 » January 8th, 2022, 11:45 am

MrFoolish wrote:A question for one and all.

Once we are on the downslope of infections, and we know the pressure is off the health service, will you continue to worry about covid or is it time to return to normal life?

Can you expand on the question? Or clarify it at least.

It's directed at "one and all", so presumably including yourself. By using the phrase "continue to worry" you are assuming the audience (everyone including yourself, remember) is worrying right now.

So I think it's only fair if you answer first. Will you continue to worry?

Scott.

MrFoolish
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2438
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 7:27 pm
Has thanked: 582 times
Been thanked: 1176 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471356

Postby MrFoolish » January 8th, 2022, 11:56 am

swill453 wrote:
MrFoolish wrote:A question for one and all.

Once we are on the downslope of infections, and we know the pressure is off the health service, will you continue to worry about covid or is it time to return to normal life?

Can you expand on the question? Or clarify it at least.

It's directed at "one and all", so presumably including yourself. By using the phrase "continue to worry" you are assuming the audience (everyone including yourself, remember) is worrying right now.

So I think it's only fair if you answer first. Will you continue to worry?

Scott.


I don't mind answering. By "worry" I mean "be concerned about", to the extent you will act in a manner you didn't prior to covid, e.g. mask wearing and avoiding social interactions.

For myself, my current thinking is I will return to normal (within the rules) once the numbers are on the way down. Assuming there's not an unexpected turn of events, obviously. I'm fully vaccinated and from my understanding we can't avoid omicron indefinitely. Indeed, infection from omicron might have certain immunity benefits.

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6491
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1572 times
Been thanked: 983 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471367

Postby odysseus2000 » January 8th, 2022, 12:29 pm

Hallucigenia
A question for one and all.

Once we are on the downslope of infections, and we know the pressure is off the health service, will you continue to worry about covid or is it time to return to normal life?


Perhaps I am the only person in the class of not having my life much troubled by Covid.

Most of the stuff I do is local, one person based with most supplies coming in via ebay and some sales going in reverse. Being a small scale farm as part of my activities meant I could continue to work through the first lock down, the most amazing thing I remember is how clean the air was. When a neighbour started his tractor I could for the first time smell how the diesel fumes engulfed the area, previously I never noticed. The various folk who come to help kept their distance but that is normal as they know what their jobs are and usually don't need me and honey sales went along as normal. Turn over for local shows fell away when the local shows were cancelled, but everything survived on the reduced turnover. Meanwhile the markets stayed open and were generally very kind to me.

Since I work most of the time missing out on social events didn't bother me and in some cases was a blessing as there are some folk who can be real bores in my circle of connections and otherwise I spend most time at these events trying to change the conversation to more interesting topics.

I was due to attend an international science school in 2020 but it was cancelled which was a disappointment, but otherwise the viral war has made very little difference to me. A few visits from over seas didn't happen too, but that more bothered the potential visitor than me.

In terms of illness, in March of 2020 my breathing was so bad that 13 steps left me feeling like I ran a sprint. I managed to continue to do stable service throughout but some days I didn't manage to do anything much else. I tested for covid several times and was always negative. Various clinicians have said I probably had another bug which I could presumably have caught any time.

The nhs had delays of weeks before even a telephone conversation and I got better having bought the thickest sleeping bag I could find and sleeping warm. When I was much better various tests showed I was low on iron and b12 and I have addressed these using diet and my Apple watch now shows that my cardio fitness level is above average and slowly improving as I take more walks. So in some wild sense the illness was a blessing for me as it showed I was not eating a good diet or exercising enough but it sure did not feel like that at the time. Still for such discoveries and changes I am truly thankful.

Regards,

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7316
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1697 times
Been thanked: 3894 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471369

Postby Mike4 » January 8th, 2022, 12:31 pm

My own thinking is that if I'm to get Omicron for certain, I'd rather get it in the Spring or Summer than in mid-Winter.

Mainly because respiratory diseases of any type seem to have more impact in winter, but also should I end up being hospitalised, I'd rather be in a hospital that is not so rammed full as they are now and competing with hundreds of other patients for the attention of only 75% of the staff.

TUK020
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2046
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 7:41 am
Has thanked: 765 times
Been thanked: 1179 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471404

Postby TUK020 » January 8th, 2022, 3:19 pm

Mike4 wrote:My own thinking is that if I'm to get Omicron for certain, I'd rather get it in the Spring or Summer than in mid-Winter.

Mainly because respiratory diseases of any type seem to have more impact in winter, but also should I end up being hospitalised, I'd rather be in a hospital that is not so rammed full as they are now and competing with hundreds of other patients for the attention of only 75% of the staff.

Take Vit D supplements

staffordian
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2309
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 4:20 pm
Has thanked: 1909 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471407

Postby staffordian » January 8th, 2022, 3:31 pm

TUK020 wrote:
Mike4 wrote:My own thinking is that if I'm to get Omicron for certain, I'd rather get it in the Spring or Summer than in mid-Winter.

Mainly because respiratory diseases of any type seem to have more impact in winter, but also should I end up being hospitalised, I'd rather be in a hospital that is not so rammed full as they are now and competing with hundreds of other patients for the attention of only 75% of the staff.

Take Vit D supplements

I do this, 50 microgrammes per day, but doubt it will prevent me getting it, I just hope it's another weapon in the [expletive deleted], together with vaccinations, sensible (but not over the top) and suchlike to possibly reduce it's severity should I get it

Some experts seem to believe that it's now a case of when rather than if, and if that is so, then I agree with Mike4, later rather than sooner, please :)

RockRabbit
Lemon Slice
Posts: 456
Joined: December 31st, 2019, 9:10 am
Has thanked: 1356 times
Been thanked: 407 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471417

Postby RockRabbit » January 8th, 2022, 5:25 pm

TUK020 wrote:
Mike4 wrote:My own thinking is that if I'm to get Omicron for certain, I'd rather get it in the Spring or Summer than in mid-Winter.

Mainly because respiratory diseases of any type seem to have more impact in winter, but also should I end up being hospitalised, I'd rather be in a hospital that is not so rammed full as they are now and competing with hundreds of other patients for the attention of only 75% of the staff.

Take Vit D supplements

I've had Covid previously, am triple vaxed and have taken Vitamin D for years.

I caught Omicron (which was mild for me) within two weeks of it reaching the UK, with minimal exposure to other people. I know several people in similar situations.

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8386
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 927 times
Been thanked: 4224 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471427

Postby tjh290633 » January 8th, 2022, 6:01 pm

MrFoolish wrote:A question for one and all.

Once we are on the downslope of infections, and we know the pressure is off the health service, will you continue to worry about covid or is it time to return to normal life?

I don't worry about it and am following as near to a normal life as is possible.

TJH

BullDog
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2504
Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
Has thanked: 2026 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471434

Postby BullDog » January 8th, 2022, 6:33 pm

staffordian wrote:
TUK020 wrote:
Mike4 wrote:My own thinking is that if I'm to get Omicron for certain, I'd rather get it in the Spring or Summer than in mid-Winter.

Mainly because respiratory diseases of any type seem to have more impact in winter, but also should I end up being hospitalised, I'd rather be in a hospital that is not so rammed full as they are now and competing with hundreds of other patients for the attention of only 75% of the staff.

Take Vit D supplements

I do this, 50 microgrammes per day, but doubt it will prevent me getting it, I just hope it's another weapon in the [expletive deleted], together with vaccinations, sensible (but not over the top) and suchlike to possibly reduce it's severity should I get it

Some experts seem to believe that it's now a case of when rather than if, and if that is so, then I agree with Mike4, later rather than sooner, please :)

I suspect that quite a few of us triple jabbed (and vitamin D just in case) may be experiencing Omicron without any really notable symptoms. During the upturn in Omicron infections, I had a sore throat and sinus discomfort but tested negative on lateral flow tests. I am not 100% convinced I didn't have mild a covid infection.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7316
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1697 times
Been thanked: 3894 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471453

Postby Mike4 » January 8th, 2022, 8:14 pm

TUK020 wrote:
Mike4 wrote:My own thinking is that if I'm to get Omicron for certain, I'd rather get it in the Spring or Summer than in mid-Winter.

Mainly because respiratory diseases of any type seem to have more impact in winter, but also should I end up being hospitalised, I'd rather be in a hospital that is not so rammed full as they are now and competing with hundreds of other patients for the attention of only 75% of the staff.

Take Vit D supplements


I take 5,000 iu of D3 per day. also Vitamin K2, and zinc.

Had my Vitamin D in blood level lab-checked about a year ago and on the 5,000 iu per day, it was towards the upper end of what is considered correct. Goodness knows how low it must have been before I discovered how important it is.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7316
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1697 times
Been thanked: 3894 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471454

Postby Mike4 » January 8th, 2022, 8:20 pm

BullDog wrote:I suspect that quite a few of us triple jabbed (and vitamin D just in case) may be experiencing Omicron without any really notable symptoms. During the upturn in Omicron infections, I had a sore throat and sinus discomfort but tested negative on lateral flow tests. I am not 100% convinced I didn't have mild a covid infection.


Exactly the same here. I was more ill than I thought possible on Xmas day and boxing day with what seemed like an extremely bad cold and lungs full to the brim with mucous. I could barely speak. All LFTs came out negative as did a PCR at the Newbury guvvermint test site. It started, peaked then vanished all inside about 12 days when for me, a cold usually drags on for at least a month, often more.

I too think this might have been Omicron but the test results say otherwise.

Sorcery
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1269
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:38 pm
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 399 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471480

Postby Sorcery » January 8th, 2022, 10:55 pm

Mike4 wrote:
BullDog wrote:I suspect that quite a few of us triple jabbed (and vitamin D just in case) may be experiencing Omicron without any really notable symptoms. During the upturn in Omicron infections, I had a sore throat and sinus discomfort but tested negative on lateral flow tests. I am not 100% convinced I didn't have mild a covid infection.


Exactly the same here. I was more ill than I thought possible on Xmas day and boxing day with what seemed like an extremely bad cold and lungs full to the brim with mucous. I could barely speak. All LFTs came out negative as did a PCR at the Newbury guvvermint test site. It started, peaked then vanished all inside about 12 days when for me, a cold usually drags on for at least a month, often more.

I too think this might have been Omicron but the test results say otherwise.


The other thing to do is smoke obviously, if it does'n't help with respiratory diseases what can? There are no receptors left in my lungs for the virus variant to latch on to. :-)
I am quite serious about the above, we evolved a great deal from the point we started breathing in and sleeping round camp fires.

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8517
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4525 times
Been thanked: 3656 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471484

Postby servodude » January 8th, 2022, 11:00 pm

Why is there no facepalm emoji ? :(

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8517
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4525 times
Been thanked: 3656 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471489

Postby servodude » January 9th, 2022, 1:08 am

Mike4 wrote:
BullDog wrote:I suspect that quite a few of us triple jabbed (and vitamin D just in case) may be experiencing Omicron without any really notable symptoms. During the upturn in Omicron infections, I had a sore throat and sinus discomfort but tested negative on lateral flow tests. I am not 100% convinced I didn't have mild a covid infection.


Exactly the same here. I was more ill than I thought possible on Xmas day and boxing day


Happened to a few of us over the holiday break
- but we put it down to what's been named "a Prince Andrew"
- or enjoying a 16 year old too much (1)

-sd

1: (obviously in our case it was Lagavulan - I'd forgotten how much it can hurt)

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7316
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1697 times
Been thanked: 3894 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#471496

Postby Mike4 » January 9th, 2022, 8:05 am

servodude wrote:
Mike4 wrote:
BullDog wrote:I suspect that quite a few of us triple jabbed (and vitamin D just in case) may be experiencing Omicron without any really notable symptoms. During the upturn in Omicron infections, I had a sore throat and sinus discomfort but tested negative on lateral flow tests. I am not 100% convinced I didn't have mild a covid infection.


Exactly the same here. I was more ill than I thought possible on Xmas day and boxing day


Happened to a few of us over the holiday break
- but we put it down to what's been named "a Prince Andrew"
- or enjoying a 16 year old too much (1)

-sd

1: (obviously in our case it was Lagavulan - I'd forgotten how much it can hurt)



Lol.

In retrospect, a better illustration of just how ill I was over Xmas is I consumed no single malt whatsoever, nor any alcohol at all for four days, so I must have been bad!

On reflection this is odd because with a bad cold I usually run to self-medication with passable Cognac in the evening and at night, but not this time. So another indication it perhaps wasn't a 'normal' cold I had.


Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests