dealtn wrote:Well as someone responsible for attendees in such a public space I'd rather the Government didn't make such decisions on what we "need to do". My preference, if they were to do anything would be to educate us, (that is providers, and attendees), on what the science tells us. The risks associated with that, and the choices we undertake are "ours" to make, and mandatory "needs" would be no different to other existing types of legislation surrounding similar Health and Safety measures.
Apologies for the ambiguity. By "need to do" I was thinking of legislation around building regulations etc. It's all very well saying "leave it to the individual", but if evidence concludes public health is best served by fitting appropriate air circulation and filtration systems in shopping centres, restaurants etc. I don't want that decision to be optional, same as I don't expect fire exits to be "optional".
VRD