Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site

Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

The home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 3644 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341340

Postby swill453 » September 19th, 2020, 10:55 am

Nimrod103 wrote:I am still not clear. The Daily Mail regularly shows graphs of number of tests. The numbers clearly are of tests actually performed. For 17th Sept, they show 236,219 tests. That is not capacity, that must be actual tests:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... kdown.html
Scroll down to the green graph labelled
'Coronavirus tests each day in UK'

The number for "people tested" is always far less, usually less than half of, the number of "tests performed". Some people are tested twice, some tests fail etc.

Perhaps the media should interrogate or highlight this more than they do.

Scott.

Clitheroekid
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2859
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 1385 times
Been thanked: 3775 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341352

Postby Clitheroekid » September 19th, 2020, 11:29 am

Having become extremely fed up with the idiocy that this country has become I decided I needed to seek refuge for a few days in a more sane place.

After carefully considering all the options I opted for Slovenia. It’s one of the few European countries that I’ve never visited, and I’d heard good reports from friends who had been there.

I duly made arrangements last week, and we were due to leave next Saturday.

Unfortunately, quarantine bingo then kicked in and as of yesterday Slovenia has been added to the no-go list.

The justification for this is that the infection rate is supposedly 29 per 100,000.

The infection rate in Bolton is approximately 10 times that figure. Can anyone therefore explain to me why if I visit Slovenia I have to self isolate for 14 days on my return, whereas I am entirely free to go to Bolton, spend all day in the pub with potentially infected people, and then return home without any restrictions at all?

It’s ironic that it’s precisely this sort of Alice in Wonderland logic that made me want to leave in the first place.

And now back to studying the list of exempt countries again - I believe Cyprus is quite pleasant in the autumn ...

Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4652
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 902 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341354

Postby Bouleversee » September 19th, 2020, 11:44 am

Yesterday, I finally had my long delayed lung function tests, having been assured on enquiry that full anti-infection measures would be in place. I had to leave home earlier than originally planned after discovering that their parking meters only took cash and I didn't have any. I was surprised on checking in to see the receptionist wearing a cloth mask underneath her nose and even more surprised when she emerged from her booth to take my temperature with a gun at a distance of only around a yard. I don't really see the point of these temperature checks anyway since they only indicate symptoms, rather than infection. The person conducting the tests (which were not as extensive as on the previous occasion) was wearing a close fitting plastic mask but not my idea of full PPE though he had to come close. I obviously had to remove my mask to do the tests. Something tells me that if either side had been infected, the virus might not have had too much difficulty in clocking up another victim or two.

It will be interesting to see what happens when I have my rescheduled appt. with the consultant next month. I had better check whether they have omitted telling me it will be over the phone, as happened to someone I know. Of course, we may be in total lockdown by then the way things are going.

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3561
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2371 times
Been thanked: 1943 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341355

Postby scotia » September 19th, 2020, 11:47 am

Government Testing Statistics:- https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/testing
The Seven Day UK Average on the 6th September for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 tests was 179,152. The testing capacity was 221,867. These statistics should match (in time) with Fiona Bruce's figure of 81,000. And the discrepancy, as swill453 wrote, is that the 81,000 should refer to "newly tested people" in England - source the Department of Health and Care Statistical Bulletin. This would seem to indicate that around half of the tests are repeats. I suppose there are a considerable number of persons in the care and medical areas who will need to be regularly checked.

At 17th September, the UK pillar 1 and 2 tests processed = 236,219. the Testing capacity = 252,911.

Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4652
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 902 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341357

Postby Bouleversee » September 19th, 2020, 11:54 am

Clitheroekid wrote:Having become extremely fed up with the idiocy that this country has become I decided I needed to seek refuge for a few days in a more sane place.

After carefully considering all the options I opted for Slovenia. It’s one of the few European countries that I’ve never visited, and I’d heard good reports from friends who had been there.

I duly made arrangements last week, and we were due to leave next Saturday.

Unfortunately, quarantine bingo then kicked in and as of yesterday Slovenia has been added to the no-go list.

The justification for this is that the infection rate is supposedly 29 per 100,000.

The infection rate in Bolton is approximately 10 times that figure. Can anyone therefore explain to me why if I visit Slovenia I have to self isolate for 14 days on my return, whereas I am entirely free to go to Bolton, spend all day in the pub with potentially infected people, and then return home without any restrictions at all?

It’s ironic that it’s precisely this sort of Alice in Wonderland logic that made me want to leave in the first place.

And now back to studying the list of exempt countries again - I believe Cyprus is quite pleasant in the autumn ...


Can anyone explain why other countries would want to let British people in? Actually, some don't, according to my son, who is self employed in the travel trade.

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 3644 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341365

Postby swill453 » September 19th, 2020, 12:10 pm

Clitheroekid wrote:The infection rate in Bolton is approximately 10 times that figure. Can anyone therefore explain to me why if I visit Slovenia I have to self isolate for 14 days on my return, whereas I am entirely free to go to Bolton, spend all day in the pub with potentially infected people, and then return home without any restrictions at all?

One might speculate that the testing figures show that more outbreaks of Covid in the UK have been shown to be caused by people returning from holidays in infected countries than have been caused by people socialising in pubs.

Scott.

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6072
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 2324 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341371

Postby dealtn » September 19th, 2020, 12:49 pm

Bouleversee wrote: Something tells me that if either side had been infected, the virus might not have had too much difficulty in clocking up another victim or two.



Exposure isn't the same as infection. Plenty of couples share a bed for several hours 7 days a week without partners being infected. I doubt your exposure was even close to that kind of "affection". I agree though that no-one should be made to feel uncomfortable with anything they are asked to do, or be exposed to though - although that is a different thing.

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6072
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 2324 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341372

Postby dealtn » September 19th, 2020, 12:52 pm

Bouleversee wrote:
Can anyone explain why other countries would want to let British people in? Actually, some don't, according to my son, who is self employed in the travel trade.


Because we bring money. Lack of money and the effect of that on the economy is more harmful to most citizens.

Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4652
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 902 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341375

Postby Bouleversee » September 19th, 2020, 1:36 pm

dealtn wrote:
Bouleversee wrote: Something tells me that if either side had been infected, the virus might not have had too much difficulty in clocking up another victim or two.



Exposure isn't the same as infection. Plenty of couples share a bed for several hours 7 days a week without partners being infected. I doubt your exposure was even close to that kind of "affection". I agree though that no-one should be made to feel uncomfortable with anything they are asked to do, or be exposed to though - although that is a different thing.


How do you know the partners are not affected? They may just be asymptomatic but nevertheless infectious to others. Unless they had a test for infection or an antibody test at the right time, you can't know. I do know the difference between exposure and infection. In any event, it just doesn't look good in a hospital setting, especially in a department dealing with highly vulnerable patients with respiratory diseases, and sets a bad example to the rest of the community. Much of the spread of the virus is due to ignorance and complacency.

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8916
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1309 times
Been thanked: 3668 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341386

Postby redsturgeon » September 19th, 2020, 3:13 pm

Clitheroekid wrote:
And now back to studying the list of exempt countries again - I believe Cyprus is quite pleasant in the autumn ...


Mrs RS is in Madeira at the moment, enjoying it, great walking in the mountains.
Daughter is on a small Greek island, no cases (yet).

John

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6072
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 2324 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341406

Postby dealtn » September 19th, 2020, 6:14 pm

Bouleversee wrote:
dealtn wrote:
Bouleversee wrote: Something tells me that if either side had been infected, the virus might not have had too much difficulty in clocking up another victim or two.



Exposure isn't the same as infection. Plenty of couples share a bed for several hours 7 days a week without partners being infected. I doubt your exposure was even close to that kind of "affection". I agree though that no-one should be made to feel uncomfortable with anything they are asked to do, or be exposed to though - although that is a different thing.


How do you know the partners are not affected? They may just be asymptomatic but nevertheless infectious to others. Unless they had a test for infection or an antibody test at the right time, you can't know. I do know the difference between exposure and infection. In any event, it just doesn't look good in a hospital setting, especially in a department dealing with highly vulnerable patients with respiratory diseases, and sets a bad example to the rest of the community. Much of the spread of the virus is due to ignorance and complacency.


Well I agree with the second part (as can be seen from my initial response).

My wife is a nurse. We have a number of nurses as friends. Of those 3 have so far tested positive, and have been tested on occasions before the positive tests, returning negative a number of times, and negative too since "recovery". So there would have been plenty of time before, when they were "infectious" yet asymptomatic when they were sharing a house with family and bed with partner. No one else in the 3 households tested positive at the time, or subsequently, or showed symptoms. (2 of the tested nurses did - 1 only very mildly).

This doesn't appear dissimilar to other episodes. There have been a number of people testing positive to antibody tests that had no idea they ever had it, and shared households with families and beds with partners throughout, but are the only one in that house to test positive. Yet some "super-spreader" events appear to give an impression it is easy to transmit.

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8916
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1309 times
Been thanked: 3668 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341435

Postby redsturgeon » September 20th, 2020, 2:02 am

Moderator Message:
The previous post by nimnarb has been deleted. It contains a large section of copied text with no link for attribution contrary to site rules.

nimnarb
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1263
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 4:10 pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 735 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341438

Postby nimnarb » September 20th, 2020, 3:01 am

Oops, sorry about that I totally forgot the link. Apologies.

Moderator Message:
You can repost one short paragraph with a link to the rest if you want to.

gryffron
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3608
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:00 am
Has thanked: 552 times
Been thanked: 1587 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341481

Postby gryffron » September 20th, 2020, 11:14 am

scotia wrote:The Seven Day UK Average on the 6th September for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 tests was 179,152. The testing capacity was 221,867. These statistics should match (in time) with Fiona Bruce's figure of 81,000. And the discrepancy, as swill453 wrote, is that the 81,000 should refer to "newly tested people"

So hang on. Why is the "newly tested people" figure relevant at all? Why do the media think that repeat tests should not "count"? Is this the same media who constantly bleat about testing of medical staff, care home staff, teachers, etc...? This is just a blatant "How to lie with statistics".

Gryff

simoan
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2092
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 9:37 am
Has thanked: 465 times
Been thanked: 1458 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341486

Postby simoan » September 20th, 2020, 11:45 am

gryffron wrote:
scotia wrote:The Seven Day UK Average on the 6th September for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 tests was 179,152. The testing capacity was 221,867. These statistics should match (in time) with Fiona Bruce's figure of 81,000. And the discrepancy, as swill453 wrote, is that the 81,000 should refer to "newly tested people"

So hang on. Why is the "newly tested people" figure relevant at all? Why do the media think that repeat tests should not "count"? Is this the same media who constantly bleat about testing of medical staff, care home staff, teachers, etc...? This is just a blatant "How to lie with statistics".

Gryff

I think you have to assume that everyone is using statistics to suit their own agenda. I stopped looking at numbers before the end of April because it was obvious they were being used by the government and the media to suit their own purposes. It has also been obvious for a long time that the numbers presented are a poor estimation of what's happening in the real world, which is ultimately all that matters. All you can conclude is that people are making it up as they go along because they were totally unprepared for what has happened in the last 6 months and they are now comparing things that are not comparable.

I assume everyone interested in the numbers listens to "More or Less" with Tim Harford on R4? If not, you should do. There's not much to laugh about currently but it's the best comedy show anywhere and every Wednesday morning it gives me a good chuckle. As an example, last week they revealed that when the Health Secretary announced that the average distance anyone travels to get a test is 10 Miles, the average he was talking about was the median, not the mean! One can only assume from this that the mean was much higher. And of course, it was also only the average of the people that actually travelled to a test centre, so didn't include people that couldn't, or didn't fancy driving 100 miles to get a test. I'd like to say "you couldn't make it up", but obviously you can.

All the best, Si

gryffron
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3608
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:00 am
Has thanked: 552 times
Been thanked: 1587 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341487

Postby gryffron » September 20th, 2020, 11:50 am

There's a Penguin book called "How to Lie with Statistics". Written 60+ years ago but still relevant. A must read for anyone who listens to politicians or the media. Covers all the tricks about use of different "averages", choosing reference points, scaling graphs, rate of change...

Gryff

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3561
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2371 times
Been thanked: 1943 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341491

Postby scotia » September 20th, 2020, 12:09 pm

gryffron wrote:
scotia wrote:The Seven Day UK Average on the 6th September for Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 tests was 179,152. The testing capacity was 221,867. These statistics should match (in time) with Fiona Bruce's figure of 81,000. And the discrepancy, as swill453 wrote, is that the 81,000 should refer to "newly tested people"

So hang on. Why is the "newly tested people" figure relevant at all? Why do the media think that repeat tests should not "count"? Is this the same media who constantly bleat about testing of medical staff, care home staff, teachers, etc...? This is just a blatant "How to lie with statistics".
Gryff

Agreed.

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8916
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1309 times
Been thanked: 3668 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341492

Postby redsturgeon » September 20th, 2020, 12:10 pm

For me the crucial statistic is turnaround time. Any covid test is pretty useless if you have to wait two weeks for it.

John

sg31
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1543
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 925 times
Been thanked: 708 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341501

Postby sg31 » September 20th, 2020, 12:54 pm

dealtn wrote:
This doesn't appear dissimilar to other episodes. There have been a number of people testing positive to antibody tests that had no idea they ever had it, and shared households with families and beds with partners throughout, but are the only one in that house to test positive. Yet some "super-spreader" events appear to give an impression it is easy to transmit.


How accurate are the antibody tests? I know some if not most can produce false positives by picking up earlier corona virus infections that weren't/aren't Sars- CoV- 2.

I ask because I'm not up to date on current antibody tests in use in this country.

johnhemming
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3858
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#341504

Postby johnhemming » September 20th, 2020, 1:24 pm

redsturgeon wrote:For me the crucial statistic is turnaround time. Any covid test is pretty useless if you have to wait two weeks for it.

A local pub that had a positive covid test did not find out until 13 days after the person infected visited the pub.


Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests