Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh, for Donating to support the site
Deadpool 2
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2156
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:21 am
- Has thanked: 288 times
- Been thanked: 282 times
Re: Deadpool 2
For a while I was confused, was thinking of The Dead Pool (dirty harry)..."Only with humans"
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1078 times
- Been thanked: 1091 times
Re: Deadpool 2
4/10 for me.
This sequel is what all sequels used to be like, capitalising on the surprise success of a film by doing the same sort of thing all over again, but not as well, without the originality of the first, and with everyone involved being a bit lack-lustre.
However, I have the feeling the scriptwriters think they've created the cleverest and funniest film ever. I'm sure they had a great time showing off to each other how clever they were to know about lots of other films they could reference and be snide about. But here's the thing - a clever idea isn't the same as a joke. Simply saying "in films with time-travel (e.g. Terminator) people should just go back earlier to make their job easier" isn't funny by itself, but it could be the basis for creating something funny. The film is full of stuff like this. Also lots of self-indulgent extended scenes, where the idea really isn't funny, but because the star is also a co-writer, nobody told them to cut it.
The film is pretty relentless throughout in its attempts to be funny/clever, so inevitably at least some of it will work - I particularly liked the idea of someone whose superpower was "being lucky" which then actually got developed into a running joke with some funny visual gags. There's also a famous star doing a very brief cameo.
As far as audio quality goes, I had no problem with catching the quick-fire dialogue.
This sequel is what all sequels used to be like, capitalising on the surprise success of a film by doing the same sort of thing all over again, but not as well, without the originality of the first, and with everyone involved being a bit lack-lustre.
However, I have the feeling the scriptwriters think they've created the cleverest and funniest film ever. I'm sure they had a great time showing off to each other how clever they were to know about lots of other films they could reference and be snide about. But here's the thing - a clever idea isn't the same as a joke. Simply saying "in films with time-travel (e.g. Terminator) people should just go back earlier to make their job easier" isn't funny by itself, but it could be the basis for creating something funny. The film is full of stuff like this. Also lots of self-indulgent extended scenes, where the idea really isn't funny, but because the star is also a co-writer, nobody told them to cut it.
The film is pretty relentless throughout in its attempts to be funny/clever, so inevitably at least some of it will work - I particularly liked the idea of someone whose superpower was "being lucky" which then actually got developed into a running joke with some funny visual gags. There's also a famous star doing a very brief cameo.
As far as audio quality goes, I had no problem with catching the quick-fire dialogue.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 954
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:35 pm
- Has thanked: 616 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Deadpool 2
Bit of a shock for me to see a current movie so here I am reporting in...
I liked it. Silly, violent, sweary, gory. What's not to like*?
Lots of preposterous things in it, but that definitely goes with the territory, so you just go with it.
* Ok, I will say this, all the "breaking the fourth wall" stuff is okay, and part of the schtick, but for some reason the references to being in a movie grated a little. A bit too....Probably just me.
My local vue is £5, £4 on Mondays, but I had some free tickets, definitely worth the price of admission. Ho ho. No, I liked it really, 7/10.
I liked it. Silly, violent, sweary, gory. What's not to like*?
Lots of preposterous things in it, but that definitely goes with the territory, so you just go with it.
* Ok, I will say this, all the "breaking the fourth wall" stuff is okay, and part of the schtick, but for some reason the references to being in a movie grated a little. A bit too....Probably just me.
My local vue is £5, £4 on Mondays, but I had some free tickets, definitely worth the price of admission. Ho ho. No, I liked it really, 7/10.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 406
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:52 pm
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: Deadpool 2
zico wrote:
I particularly liked the idea of someone whose superpower was "being lucky" which then actually got developed into a running joke with some funny visual gags.
Although this concept has been done by Stan Lee, and I believe there's a series currently running on Sky somewhere.... maybe with fewer gags (I dunno, haven't seen it)
BH
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
- Has thanked: 640 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Deadpool 2
bionichamster wrote:Although this concept has been done by Stan Lee, and I believe there's a series currently running on Sky somewhere.... maybe with fewer gags (I dunno, haven't seen it)
Stan Lee's Lucky Man on Sky 1.
I gave up on it as I found it quite dark and depressing. Plus I've never warmed to James Nesbitt as an actor.
Slarti
Return to “Music, Theatre, TV and Film”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests