Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site
Backdating a Deal
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10689
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1458 times
- Been thanked: 2965 times
Backdating a Deal
Is this scenario a fraud?
Companies A and B are negotiating a deal.
The deal is signed on April 4th. But the negotiator from Company A wants the deal to show in his figures for January-March, and asks B to agree to backdate the deal to March 31st.
B has no internal pressures one way or the other. Should B agree? If not, why not?
Does A's motivation make any difference to the answer? For example, if it fed into A's personal bonus vs looking better in the company's accounts?
Companies A and B are negotiating a deal.
The deal is signed on April 4th. But the negotiator from Company A wants the deal to show in his figures for January-March, and asks B to agree to backdate the deal to March 31st.
B has no internal pressures one way or the other. Should B agree? If not, why not?
Does A's motivation make any difference to the answer? For example, if it fed into A's personal bonus vs looking better in the company's accounts?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3858
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
It starts really with a question as to what the possible range of dates could be that any particular deal is agreed. If there are a range of dates then I would not think that it would necessarily be a problem picking one of them.
For example if company B provides services to company A and they agree that the services will be provided, but that they will work on the details of the agreement then there has been an agreement since at least the point at which the services started being provided. Then there are questions as to when negotiations started and what has varied over what period.
However, there are also times it can be fraudulent. Hence it is something to take specific advice on if it is not clear from all of the facts.
For example if company B provides services to company A and they agree that the services will be provided, but that they will work on the details of the agreement then there has been an agreement since at least the point at which the services started being provided. Then there are questions as to when negotiations started and what has varied over what period.
However, there are also times it can be fraudulent. Hence it is something to take specific advice on if it is not clear from all of the facts.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:26 pm
- Has thanked: 225 times
- Been thanked: 686 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
Is the service vatable? If so - it is just possible that changing the date of the deal will have implications on payment period for VAT charged (and possibly recovered).
T7
T7
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3590 times
- Been thanked: 1509 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
The manipulation of contract dates is one of the issues in the HP v Autonomy case:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/05/08/hps-star-witness-mike-lynch-fraud-trial-describes-uncomfortable/ (Premium
RC
Mr Egan said that he once asked for a purchase order to be sent to his personal email address so that he could backdate the deal to the previous quarter for Autonomy’s accounts.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/05/08/hps-star-witness-mike-lynch-fraud-trial-describes-uncomfortable/ (Premium
RC
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3858
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
There are, however, differences between a situation where both parties agree for a particular operative date which is prior to the final detailed agreement and something where one of the parties (or an employee of one of the parties) unilaterally changes the operative date.
Rummaging around I found this article which I thought was quite good.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail ... 3c35a88341
Rummaging around I found this article which I thought was quite good.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail ... 3c35a88341
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10689
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1458 times
- Been thanked: 2965 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
ReformedCharacter wrote:The manipulation of contract dates is one of the issues in the HP v Autonomy case:
RC
That is precisely what I was fishing for insights into. I thought that a nonspecific question might, with luck, lead to more interesting discussion.
The Register is reporting on it in detail ( https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/05/1 ... ng_allegs/ for the specific question), and it makes for quite a soap opera.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10689
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1458 times
- Been thanked: 2965 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
johnhemming wrote:Rummaging around I found this article which I thought was quite good.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail ... 3c35a88341
Well, that's a surprisingly clear and unambiguous clarification of the specific question (yes, what's being alleged was improper).
Thanks for the link.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3858
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
The issue of hitting quarter or annual targets has been around for decades. It obviously also relates to the basic question as to when revenue is recognised. Personally I have always preferred a cautious approach to the recognition of revenue because I prefer good surprises to bad ones.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Backdating a Deal
In the US backdating the date of a contract so it is reported in a different financial period is called wire fraud and carries a custodial sentence. I know because a CEO of the company I worked for was jailed for doing just that. I assume something similar applies here, as the effect of the reporting would be to fraudulently misrepresent the financial performance of the company as different than it had been.
Right, I'll stop replying to ancient posts now.
RW
Right, I'll stop replying to ancient posts now.
RW
Return to “Legal Issues (Practical)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests