Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to gvonge,Shelford,GrahamPlatt,gpadsa,Steffers0, for Donating to support the site
Fusion Power
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Fusion Power
Nuclear fusion plant to be built at West Burton A power station
BBC News
A power station has been chosen to be the site of the UK's, and potentially the world's, first prototype commercial nuclear fusion reactor.
"Fusion is a potential source of almost limitless clean energy but is currently only carried out in experiments.
The government had shortlisted five sites but has picked the West Burton A plant in Nottinghamshire.
The plant should be operational by the early 2040s, a UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) spokesman has said."
BBC News
A power station has been chosen to be the site of the UK's, and potentially the world's, first prototype commercial nuclear fusion reactor.
"Fusion is a potential source of almost limitless clean energy but is currently only carried out in experiments.
The government had shortlisted five sites but has picked the West Burton A plant in Nottinghamshire.
The plant should be operational by the early 2040s, a UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) spokesman has said."
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
- Has thanked: 2016 times
- Been thanked: 1221 times
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
I was a bit surprised by this BBC article. I am unaware of any immediate prospect of power from fusion. ITER has not been completed yet and it was supposed to be the first test of whether a fusion reactor could produce greater power output from fusion than input. It does not appear to discuss the reactor configuration - the picture doesn't look like a Tokamak but may just be artistic licence.
This also seemed to me an error in the BBC article:
"Nuclear fusion reactors need to reach very high temperatures and pressure"
AFAIK fusion reactors do not operate at "very high pressure", one of the very reasons they need to operate at such extremely high temperatures.
More information here:
Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production
https://step.ukaea.uk/
STEP is a UKAEA programme that will demonstrate the ability to generate net electricity from fusion. It will also determine how the plant will be maintained through its operational life and prove the potential for the plant to produce its own fuel.
The first phase of the programme is to produce a concept design by 2024. It will be a spherical tokamak, connected to the National Grid and producing net energy, although it is not expected to be a commercially operating plant at this stage.
This also seemed to me an error in the BBC article:
"Nuclear fusion reactors need to reach very high temperatures and pressure"
AFAIK fusion reactors do not operate at "very high pressure", one of the very reasons they need to operate at such extremely high temperatures.
More information here:
Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production
https://step.ukaea.uk/
STEP is a UKAEA programme that will demonstrate the ability to generate net electricity from fusion. It will also determine how the plant will be maintained through its operational life and prove the potential for the plant to produce its own fuel.
The first phase of the programme is to produce a concept design by 2024. It will be a spherical tokamak, connected to the National Grid and producing net energy, although it is not expected to be a commercially operating plant at this stage.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6477
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1572 times
- Been thanked: 983 times
Re: Fusion Power
If it were not for the extreme credibility of the minister and the government
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-n ... e-63119465
I would dismiss this as an attempt to conjure something imaginary out of thin air to act as a smokescreen for other troubles.
There are no operating fusion reactors in the public domain, although there have been rumours of a a secret black project for over 30 years. Either this is the product of secret research or it is yet another fusion research project with no certainty as to whether it will get built and work if it is.
The plethora of preposterous government announcements is getting beyond amusing even by the standards of Private Eye, getting to the point where one feels the politicians are deliberately distorting reality for their own ends.
Regards,
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-n ... e-63119465
I would dismiss this as an attempt to conjure something imaginary out of thin air to act as a smokescreen for other troubles.
There are no operating fusion reactors in the public domain, although there have been rumours of a a secret black project for over 30 years. Either this is the product of secret research or it is yet another fusion research project with no certainty as to whether it will get built and work if it is.
The plethora of preposterous government announcements is getting beyond amusing even by the standards of Private Eye, getting to the point where one feels the politicians are deliberately distorting reality for their own ends.
Regards,
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7970
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3071 times
Re: Fusion Power
XFool wrote:I was a bit surprised by this BBC article. I am unaware of any immediate prospect of power from fusion.
There isn't any immediate prospect, but this does seem to be optimistic that the hoped-for schedule for ITER will happen on time.
"Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) is a spherical tokamak fusion plant concept proposed by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority and funded by UK government. The project is a proposed DEMO-class successor device to the ITER tokamak proof-of-concept of a fusion plant, the most advanced tokamak fusion reactor to date, which is scheduled to achieve a 'burning plasma' in 2035. STEP aims to produce net electricity from fusion on a timescale of 2040. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Tokamak_for_Energy_Production
"DEMO refers to a proposed class of nuclear fusion experimental reactors that are intended to demonstrate the net production of electric power from nuclear fusion. Most of the ITER partners have plans for their own DEMO-class reactors. With the possible exception of the EU and Japan, there are no plans for international collaboration as there was with ITER.
Plans for DEMO-class reactors are intended to build upon the ITER experimental nuclear fusion reactor."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEMOnstration_Power_Plant
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
- Has thanked: 2016 times
- Been thanked: 1221 times
Re: Fusion Power
Sounds like vapourware to me. If an ounce of steel is cut and concrete is cast, I'd be amazed.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
Things do seem to have been happening that I wasn't very aware of:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mega_Ampere_Spherical_Tokamak
Mega Ampere Spherical Tokamak (MAST) was a nuclear fusion experiment, testing a spherical tokamak nuclear fusion reactor, and commissioned by EURATOM/UKAEA. The original MAST experiment took place at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Oxfordshire, England from December 1999 to September 2013. A successor experiment called MAST Upgrade began operation in 2020.
Though, now that I come to think of it, these have been reported in recent years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mega_Ampere_Spherical_Tokamak
Mega Ampere Spherical Tokamak (MAST) was a nuclear fusion experiment, testing a spherical tokamak nuclear fusion reactor, and commissioned by EURATOM/UKAEA. The original MAST experiment took place at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Oxfordshire, England from December 1999 to September 2013. A successor experiment called MAST Upgrade began operation in 2020.
Though, now that I come to think of it, these have been reported in recent years.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7970
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3071 times
Re: Fusion Power
'No guarantee' £20bn fusion power plant will work
The body behind a £20 billion fusion power station set for the Nottinghamshire countryside says there is "no guarantee" it will work.
:
Ian Chapman, chief executive of the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) said the project could be a "really big part" of the UK's plan to tackle climate change and may have a wider impact on the world.
"This has never been done before," he said.
"We have done it as experiments in the lab and we've shown that we can make fusion happen and we can control it, but we've never done it at the scale where it produces electricity and actually powers your home.
"This will be the first of its kind and I don't know that everything will work.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-63163966
The body behind a £20 billion fusion power station set for the Nottinghamshire countryside says there is "no guarantee" it will work.
:
Ian Chapman, chief executive of the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) said the project could be a "really big part" of the UK's plan to tackle climate change and may have a wider impact on the world.
"This has never been done before," he said.
"We have done it as experiments in the lab and we've shown that we can make fusion happen and we can control it, but we've never done it at the scale where it produces electricity and actually powers your home.
"This will be the first of its kind and I don't know that everything will work.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-63163966
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
- Has thanked: 725 times
- Been thanked: 1443 times
Re: Fusion Power
£20Bn might be enough to build sufficient wind turbines and liquid air energy storage facilities to cover almost all of UK homes power needs. And push come to shove could see the 2030 time date being pulled down to perhaps 2026. And doesn't create a demand for minerals which may become increasingly scarce, other than the rising demand for the likes of electric vehicles.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 3:03 am
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 1829 times
Re: Fusion Power
ITER's current schedule of first plasma in 2025 (originally 2018) and first deuterium-tritium in 2035 now looks under threat due to defects in the thermal shields and vacuum vessel. But it's likely to take them 6 months just to work out how long they're going to delay it for...
https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles ... TER-tokama
https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles ... TER-tokama
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8993
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1332 times
- Been thanked: 3715 times
Re: Fusion Power
Moderator Message:
This topic is about fusion power. I have deleted several off topic posts and will continue to do so
This topic is about fusion power. I have deleted several off topic posts and will continue to do so
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 620 times
- Been thanked: 2725 times
Re: Fusion Power
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/ ... on-energy/
They have achieved fusion where the power generated was greater than the power consumed. A very big first!
They have achieved fusion where the power generated was greater than the power consumed. A very big first!
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
...OK.
Interesting, but this is at the Lawrence Livermore National Ignition Facility, created for research into fusion weapons. It's never been clear to me how their approach could be used as a continuous power generator - it was never designed or intended to, AFAIK.
How long does it take to recharge the energy storage to fire those lasers? Minutes? Hours? It is intrinsically a non continuous one shot at a time setup. Hopefully it may help in research into fusion power but, unless I am wrong, I can't see it as a direct option as a fusion power generator.
Interesting, but this is at the Lawrence Livermore National Ignition Facility, created for research into fusion weapons. It's never been clear to me how their approach could be used as a continuous power generator - it was never designed or intended to, AFAIK.
How long does it take to recharge the energy storage to fire those lasers? Minutes? Hours? It is intrinsically a non continuous one shot at a time setup. Hopefully it may help in research into fusion power but, unless I am wrong, I can't see it as a direct option as a fusion power generator.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
XFool wrote:How long does it take to recharge the energy storage to fire those lasers? Minutes? Hours?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility#Laser
"One of the goals for NIF is to reduce this time to less than four hours, in order to allow 700 firings a year."
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: December 9th, 2016, 6:44 am
- Has thanked: 237 times
- Been thanked: 313 times
Re: Fusion Power
XFool wrote:...OK.
Interesting, but this is at the Lawrence Livermore National Ignition Facility, created for research into fusion weapons. It's never been clear to me how their approach could be used as a continuous power generator - it was never designed or intended to, AFAIK.
How long does it take to recharge the energy storage to fire those lasers? Minutes? Hours? It is intrinsically a non continuous one shot at a time setup. Hopefully it may help in research into fusion power but, unless I am wrong, I can't see it as a direct option as a fusion power generator.
In theory (or dreams) an inertial containment fusion reactor would be like an internal combustion engine. A rapidly repeating series of small explosions average to a reasonably continuous power output. The fantasy art from decades ago had tens of explosions per second heating a water jacket that ran a steam turbine.
As you point out there is a lot of engineering, and perhaps basic physics, between where we are and where we hope to be. (The same could also be said of magnetic confinement.) It's not clear to me if the step from zero explosions to one explosion, or the step from one explosion to millions of explosions is bigger. It depends on whether you chose a log or linear model. Sometimes things proceed from proof of concept to commercial reality very quickly. Other times an initial proof of concept sits there taunting generations of scientists and engineers trying to put it to practical use.
IMHO controlled fusion is a big enough prize that both magnetic and inertial confinement should be pursued, even apart from the possibility that one line of research will generate insight that helps the other.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3686 times
- Been thanked: 1528 times
Re: Fusion Power
scrumpyjack wrote:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/12/12/us-scientists-make-huge-breakthrough-fusion-energy/
They have achieved fusion where the power generated was greater than the power consumed. A very big first!
Yes:
...researchers have managed to release 2.5 MJ of energy after using just 2.1 MJ to heat the fuel with lasers.
But:
...the positive energy gain reported ignores the 500MJ of energy that was put into the lasers themselves.
RC
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
ReformedCharacter wrote:...researchers have managed to release 2.5 MJ of energy after using just 2.1 MJ to heat the fuel with lasers.
But:...the positive energy gain reported ignores the 500MJ of energy that was put into the lasers themselves.
Not sure I understand the arithmetic there...
Obviously that 2.1MJ heating from the lasers had to be put into the lasers in the first place, so where did the 500MJ come into it? Does it mean 500MJ was put into the lasers, resulting in an effective laser output of 2.1MJ? Or only 2.1MJ of the total laser output could be harnessed for heating?
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 924
- Joined: February 5th, 2021, 4:45 pm
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 316 times
Re: Fusion Power
XFool wrote:ReformedCharacter wrote:...researchers have managed to release 2.5 MJ of energy after using just 2.1 MJ to heat the fuel with lasers.
But:...the positive energy gain reported ignores the 500MJ of energy that was put into the lasers themselves.
Not sure I understand the arithmetic there...
Obviously that 2.1MJ heating from the lasers had to be put into the lasers in the first place, so where did the 500MJ come into it? Does it mean 500MJ was put into the lasers, resulting in an effective laser output of 2.1MJ? Or only 2.1MJ of the total laser output could be harnessed for heating?
It means that produce the 2.1 MJ of optical energy used to initiate the fusion, about 500 MJ of electricity was required to power the lasers. The so-called "wall plug efficiency" of lasers can be very low.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3686 times
- Been thanked: 1528 times
Re: Fusion Power
XFool wrote:ReformedCharacter wrote:...researchers have managed to release 2.5 MJ of energy after using just 2.1 MJ to heat the fuel with lasers.
But:...the positive energy gain reported ignores the 500MJ of energy that was put into the lasers themselves.
Not sure I understand the arithmetic there...
Obviously that 2.1MJ heating from the lasers had to be put into the lasers in the first place, so where did the 500MJ come into it? Does it mean 500MJ was put into the lasers, resulting in an effective laser output of 2.1MJ? Or only 2.1MJ of the total laser output could be harnessed for heating?
Sabine Hossenfelder explains why such figures can be misleading, ie. the other energy needed to make the fusion process and associated equipment work is usually not shown as part of the input\output energy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ4W1g-6JiY
RC
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Fusion Power
NotSure wrote:It means that produce the 2.1 MJ of optical energy used to initiate the fusion, about 500 MJ of electricity was required to power the lasers. The so-called "wall plug efficiency" of lasers can be very low.
OK. That's what I feared. If so, then this sounds even further away from being a source of "fusion power" than magnetic confinement!
Where did you get those number from, Lawrence Livermore? They aren't in the Telegraph article.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests