Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Wasron,Steffers0,Anonymous,CryptoPlankton,GrahamPlatt, for Donating to support the site

Lendy: ring fenced is not ring fenced (liquidators fees)

Any other investment discussions eg. peer to peer lending
yorkshirelad1
2 Lemon pips
Posts: 142
Joined: October 5th, 2018, 1:40 pm
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Lendy: ring fenced is not ring fenced (liquidators fees)

#268709

Postby yorkshirelad1 » December 3rd, 2019, 9:15 am

People who invested in businesses via a failed peer-to-peer platform have discovered their money was not ring-fenced as promised, raising new questions for the City regulator. Lendy investors, who are owed more than £150 million, expressed shock and anger after administrators told them to brace for a much bigger hit than expected because a significant proportion of money they believe they are owed has been earmarked to pay off insolvency practitioners and creditors. – The Times


https://www.sharecast.com/news/press-round-up-short-premium/tuesday-newspaper-round-up-tsb-trump-virgin-atlantic-lendy--7144112.html

Wonder if the FSCS will step in and pay the insolvency fees (as in the case of e.g. Beaufort)

Lessons to be learnt (at the risk of stating the obvious)
  1. ring fenced no longer means ring fenced (e.g in the case of broker nominees)
  2. in case of insolvency, you may loose some of your money to liquidators fees

dspp
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4104
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 3253 times
Been thanked: 989 times

Re: Lendy: ring fenced is not ring fenced (liquidators fees)

#268773

Postby dspp » December 3rd, 2019, 12:17 pm

yorkshirelad1 wrote:
People who invested in businesses via a failed peer-to-peer platform have discovered their money was not ring-fenced as promised, raising new questions for the City regulator. Lendy investors, who are owed more than £150 million, expressed shock and anger after administrators told them to brace for a much bigger hit than expected because a significant proportion of money they believe they are owed has been earmarked to pay off insolvency practitioners and creditors. – The Times


https://www.sharecast.com/news/press-round-up-short-premium/tuesday-newspaper-round-up-tsb-trump-virgin-atlantic-lendy--7144112.html

Wonder if the FSCS will step in and pay the insolvency fees (as in the case of e.g. Beaufort)

Lessons to be learnt (at the risk of stating the obvious)
  1. ring fenced no longer means ring fenced (e.g in the case of broker nominees)
  2. in case of insolvency, you may loose some of your money to liquidators fees


Moderator Message:
moved here, this is not a brokerage topic, dspp

stevensfo
Lemon Slice
Posts: 742
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 8:43 am
Has thanked: 341 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: Lendy: ring fenced is not ring fenced (liquidators fees)

#268862

Postby stevensfo » December 3rd, 2019, 5:02 pm

have discovered their money was not ring-fenced as promised, raising new questions for the City regulator.


What friggin' new questions?? I joined TMF about 1999, and as far as I remember, the term 'ring-fenced' has been discussed ad nauseam and the expression never really proven or believed since then, so approx 20 years! It doesn't mean a bloody thing. Try finding a definition in your Broker's T&Cs.

If I steal everything in a house and keep it 'ring-fenced' in my offshore account, would that make anyone feel better?

Apart from that, I don't think any P2P providers have ever had the FSCS guarantee.

Steve


Return to “Other Investing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests