Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Anonymous,bruncher,niord,gvonge,Shelford, for Donating to support the site
Unitisation question
Forum rules
Tight HYP discussions only please - OT please discuss in strategies
Tight HYP discussions only please - OT please discuss in strategies
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 8:22 am
- Has thanked: 68 times
- Been thanked: 1029 times
Unitisation question
Apologies if this is a question that has been answered before.
I am pulling together my end of year position and want to make sure I am treating unitisation correctly. There has been little activity in my portfolio this year, only the collection of dividends and two corporate actions (one rights issue in which I participated and a consolidation associated with a return of capital). I am not withdrawing income from the portfolio, and in all but one case could not as it is in my SIPP and I am not yet at an age where I can access it. I had a cash balance at the start of the year, so have started with that added the dividends and added capital returned and subtracted funds used to participate in the rights issue. I have then used this adjusted cash balance as one of the component parts of my portfolio and calculated the unitisation using this. No other new funds have been added to the portfolio. I think this means I am unitising on the basis of accumulation units.
The alternative would presumably be to not add in the dividends as if I had taken them as income, but as I am not drawing anything from the portfolio this does not seem right to me.
Guidance would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Terry.
I am pulling together my end of year position and want to make sure I am treating unitisation correctly. There has been little activity in my portfolio this year, only the collection of dividends and two corporate actions (one rights issue in which I participated and a consolidation associated with a return of capital). I am not withdrawing income from the portfolio, and in all but one case could not as it is in my SIPP and I am not yet at an age where I can access it. I had a cash balance at the start of the year, so have started with that added the dividends and added capital returned and subtracted funds used to participate in the rights issue. I have then used this adjusted cash balance as one of the component parts of my portfolio and calculated the unitisation using this. No other new funds have been added to the portfolio. I think this means I am unitising on the basis of accumulation units.
The alternative would presumably be to not add in the dividends as if I had taken them as income, but as I am not drawing anything from the portfolio this does not seem right to me.
Guidance would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Terry.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 1601 times
- Been thanked: 1422 times
Re: Unitisation question
Wizard wrote:I am not withdrawing income from the portfolio, and in all but one case could not as it is in my SIPP and I am not yet at an age where I can access it.
Snap. I think you may find accumulation units easier to manage while reinvesting until retirement, and income units easier to use when drawing income in retirement. In that case you would only need to adjust accumulation units when you contribute new funds into your SIPP, otherwise you would need to adjust income units every time you buy or sell shares, which can quickly become a pfaff. You could of course use and compute both in parallel if you wished to.
The simplest way to start would be to compute no. units based on a notional initial value, say £100/unit, using your end of year prices:
No. Acc Units = (Value Shares + Cash) / 100, adjusted every time you add or withdraw cash
No. Inc Units = (Value Shares) / 100, adjusted every time you buy or sell shares
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8401
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 4226 times
Re: Unitisation question
Wizard wrote:The alternative would presumably be to not add in the dividends as if I had taken them as income, but as I am not drawing anything from the portfolio this does not seem right to me.
My method is to issue additional units for the dividends received.
This is no different from what happens in a company. The income rolls up into the share price until it goes XD. Just because you are not reinvesting it does not mean that it is not there. In your case, you are not withdrawing cash, in which case you would nominally sell units. However, I find it simpler to assume that the income is used to buy more units, whereas if they were accumulation units, you would not. This way, when you do buy more shares with the cash, you do not need to "buy" more units, as the cash has already provided more units.
TJH
-
- Lemon Pip
- Posts: 72
- Joined: February 13th, 2017, 4:51 pm
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: Unitisation question
Ok, Now reading this I am confused as I think I may be doing something wrong.
At the beginning I took the Value in £ and assigned that many units (So each unit is worth £1)
Now each month when I add money I add more units based on £X added / Current Price (Unfortunately at the moment that is around 85p)
As I can't afford to buy more shares every month (As I do not have that much money) I add the cash held to the portfolio value to calculate the current unit price (Value / Number Units)
Then why I buy shares (With a mixture of Dividends and New Money) the cash element goes down and the portfolio amount goes up by an equal (hopefully) amount - So i don't actually account for the dividends as coming into the portfolio until they are reinvested - should I be adding units for these as well?
I then work out the income as pence per unit so I can monitor if it goes up or down (Although as I am building and a couple of decades away from needing the money this is really just to make sure my income is growing)
Does this sound right? I was always put off Unitising but then read that it was actually quite simple and so started to do it - but now worry that I may have done it too simply?
At the beginning I took the Value in £ and assigned that many units (So each unit is worth £1)
Now each month when I add money I add more units based on £X added / Current Price (Unfortunately at the moment that is around 85p)
As I can't afford to buy more shares every month (As I do not have that much money) I add the cash held to the portfolio value to calculate the current unit price (Value / Number Units)
Then why I buy shares (With a mixture of Dividends and New Money) the cash element goes down and the portfolio amount goes up by an equal (hopefully) amount - So i don't actually account for the dividends as coming into the portfolio until they are reinvested - should I be adding units for these as well?
I then work out the income as pence per unit so I can monitor if it goes up or down (Although as I am building and a couple of decades away from needing the money this is really just to make sure my income is growing)
Does this sound right? I was always put off Unitising but then read that it was actually quite simple and so started to do it - but now worry that I may have done it too simply?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: May 2nd, 2018, 12:01 pm
- Has thanked: 731 times
- Been thanked: 1148 times
Re: Unitisation question
Here is how I do it
Accumulation Units
Portfolio Value is the prevailing value of all holdings plus cash plus ex-dividend amounts
Unit Value is the Portfolio Value divided by the number of units
Cash In: Buy units at prevailing Unit Value
Cash Out: Sell units at prevailing Unit Value
Dividends: Do nothing
Dividend Units
Portfolio Value is the prevailing value of all holdings plus cash plus ex-dividend amounts
Unit Value is the Portfolio Value divided by the number of units
Cash In: Buy units at prevailing Unit Value
Cash Out: Sell units at prevailing Unit Value
Dividends: Buy units at prevailing Unit Value
Portfolio Income is the Forecast Dividend Income for all holdings
Forecast Unit Dividend is the Portfolio Income divided by the number of units
Whether you consider Special Dividends the same as Ordinary Dividends is of course up to you. In my case I only consider those Special Dividends which, if I were drawing income, I would be relying on as income. Those which I consider to be a Return of Capital in all but name, I do not consider as income and “non-income” amounts are not included for the purpose of calculating the Portfolio Income, nor for the purchase of new Income Units.
I hope that helps
Ian
Accumulation Units
Portfolio Value is the prevailing value of all holdings plus cash plus ex-dividend amounts
Unit Value is the Portfolio Value divided by the number of units
Cash In: Buy units at prevailing Unit Value
Cash Out: Sell units at prevailing Unit Value
Dividends: Do nothing
Dividend Units
Portfolio Value is the prevailing value of all holdings plus cash plus ex-dividend amounts
Unit Value is the Portfolio Value divided by the number of units
Cash In: Buy units at prevailing Unit Value
Cash Out: Sell units at prevailing Unit Value
Dividends: Buy units at prevailing Unit Value
Portfolio Income is the Forecast Dividend Income for all holdings
Forecast Unit Dividend is the Portfolio Income divided by the number of units
Whether you consider Special Dividends the same as Ordinary Dividends is of course up to you. In my case I only consider those Special Dividends which, if I were drawing income, I would be relying on as income. Those which I consider to be a Return of Capital in all but name, I do not consider as income and “non-income” amounts are not included for the purpose of calculating the Portfolio Income, nor for the purchase of new Income Units.
I hope that helps
Ian
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8401
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 4226 times
Re: Unitisation question
I'm different from Ian, in that all dividends buy more units in my income units. Likewise, so do returns of capital.
Arguably, I should not, but what I am doing is using all cash arising to buy more units. That is the same as if I injected that amount of cash into the portfolio.
TJH
Arguably, I should not, but what I am doing is using all cash arising to buy more units. That is the same as if I injected that amount of cash into the portfolio.
TJH
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 1601 times
- Been thanked: 1422 times
Re: Unitisation question
tjh290633 wrote:My method is to issue additional units for the dividends received.
However, I find it simpler to assume that the income is used to buy more units, whereas if they were accumulation units, you would not. This way, when you do buy more shares with the cash, you do not need to "buy" more units, as the cash has already provided more units.
But if you decide to spend (some of) the income instead, then you will need to remember to "unissue" (some of) those units? Which means you need to keep track of two unit prices - when the dividend was received and when you spent (some of) it?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8401
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 4226 times
Re: Unitisation question
moorfield wrote:tjh290633 wrote:My method is to issue additional units for the dividends received.However, I find it simpler to assume that the income is used to buy more units, whereas if they were accumulation units, you would not. This way, when you do buy more shares with the cash, you do not need to "buy" more units, as the cash has already provided more units.
But if you decide to spend (some of) the income instead, then you will need to remember to "unissue" (some of) those units? Which means you need to keep track of two unit prices - when the dividend was received and when you spent (some of) it?
I normally do it on the last day of the month, and if I have withdrawn more cash than dividends received, then I "sell" units to that value. I always use the unit value at the end of the previous month to avoid circular calculation errors.
TJH
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 5338 times
Re: Unitisation question
We ought to be very careful to specifiy if we are describing our actions for income units or accumulation units - otheriwise there is a chance of misunderstanding.
As regards income units, dividends are ignored. They might be spent, or go to buy more shares, perhaps with additional capital input. If new shares are bought, the unit price is calculated using HYPtuss at the closing price of the day prior to purchase (or sale).
For accumulation units, dividends are added to the total of cash and shares. The unit price is this grand total portfolio value divided by the number of units. If shares are sold, the cash is held inside the portfolio until either taken out (when the number of units must be reduced using the price ruling on the day) or employed to buy another share.
If additional capital is added, create new units to account for it.
Accumulation units are significantly easier to use, since changes are relatively rarer than with income units, at least in my case.
Arb.
As regards income units, dividends are ignored. They might be spent, or go to buy more shares, perhaps with additional capital input. If new shares are bought, the unit price is calculated using HYPtuss at the closing price of the day prior to purchase (or sale).
For accumulation units, dividends are added to the total of cash and shares. The unit price is this grand total portfolio value divided by the number of units. If shares are sold, the cash is held inside the portfolio until either taken out (when the number of units must be reduced using the price ruling on the day) or employed to buy another share.
If additional capital is added, create new units to account for it.
Accumulation units are significantly easier to use, since changes are relatively rarer than with income units, at least in my case.
Arb.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8498
- Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
- Has thanked: 1562 times
- Been thanked: 3460 times
Re: Unitisation question
edit; I'm in accumulation mode so I think that Arb's view and mine concur - with the exception that I also include the XD element as described below - it's probably a small discrepancy.
After the initial unitisation, new money added into the HYP buys new units at the current unit value.
and
Money out of the HYP requires the cancellation of units at the current unit value.
Then it's a question of how does one calculate the unit value on which to buy/withdraw units?
Personally, I calculate the unit value based on everything that is in my HYP. i.e.
HYP Value = the value of the shares held + any cash + dividends earned (i.e. divis that are XD).
These 3 elements are what my HYP is currently worth.
Thus "HYP Value" being the sum of 3 parts is then used to calculate "unit values".
In reality, the cash + dividends elements are usually a small percentage of the overall value - an exception being the addition of a lump sum of money. And, if you are adding a lump sum of money, the probable intention is to buy/top up shares so it wouldn't stay as cash for long (*) .
(*) some posters say they are holding a percentage of cash in anticipation of a good buying opportunity - maybe 10% of their portfolio value...so once again, some exceptions.
After the initial unitisation, new money added into the HYP buys new units at the current unit value.
and
Money out of the HYP requires the cancellation of units at the current unit value.
Then it's a question of how does one calculate the unit value on which to buy/withdraw units?
Personally, I calculate the unit value based on everything that is in my HYP. i.e.
HYP Value = the value of the shares held + any cash + dividends earned (i.e. divis that are XD).
These 3 elements are what my HYP is currently worth.
Thus "HYP Value" being the sum of 3 parts is then used to calculate "unit values".
In reality, the cash + dividends elements are usually a small percentage of the overall value - an exception being the addition of a lump sum of money. And, if you are adding a lump sum of money, the probable intention is to buy/top up shares so it wouldn't stay as cash for long (*) .
(*) some posters say they are holding a percentage of cash in anticipation of a good buying opportunity - maybe 10% of their portfolio value...so once again, some exceptions.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 5338 times
Re: Unitisation question
monabri wrote:
Then it's a question of how does one calculate the unit value on which to buy/withdraw units?
I agree with your method.
If the cash held "inside the box" becomes too large, I would consider surrendering some units to reduce it. But on the whole, for most of us, I guess that cash will eventually be used for share purchases so it can just sit there.
Arb.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 529
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 1:25 am
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 212 times
Re: Unitisation question
I've never been sure if I'm correct in the way that I do it, but I'm consistent in what I do, which I think is probably the most important aspect.
As I live outside the UK, my HYP-centred ISA (and non-HYP Sipp) are frozen, and I'm in building phase for all accounts/portfolios.
Accumulation - I use the value of each whole portfolio - stocks+cash. Due to my situation in the sentence above, for ISA (and Sipp), there's never a change to the number of units, just the unit value.
Income - I use the value of stocks only - cash only 'gets counted' (ie buys or sells units) when it buys or sells stocks, not when it comes into the account in the form of dividends.
I realise that I'm probably not strictly following the standard unitization process for Income, but it's very simple, and works for me.
As I use Money as my main tracking tool, it takes me about 5 mins per year to produce the unitization details for the ISA and Sipp each.
For me the benefit of unitization with regard to HYP (i.e. my ISA), is in comparing the dividend per unit against the raw cash % increase. For example, in 2018, my raw HYP income (including specials) is 16.7% higher compared to 2017, which seems great. But the dividend per unit is actually flat over the 2 years, which is a more accurate reflection of how I am allocating capital (and Carillion, etc).
torata
As I live outside the UK, my HYP-centred ISA (and non-HYP Sipp) are frozen, and I'm in building phase for all accounts/portfolios.
Accumulation - I use the value of each whole portfolio - stocks+cash. Due to my situation in the sentence above, for ISA (and Sipp), there's never a change to the number of units, just the unit value.
Income - I use the value of stocks only - cash only 'gets counted' (ie buys or sells units) when it buys or sells stocks, not when it comes into the account in the form of dividends.
I realise that I'm probably not strictly following the standard unitization process for Income, but it's very simple, and works for me.
As I use Money as my main tracking tool, it takes me about 5 mins per year to produce the unitization details for the ISA and Sipp each.
For me the benefit of unitization with regard to HYP (i.e. my ISA), is in comparing the dividend per unit against the raw cash % increase. For example, in 2018, my raw HYP income (including specials) is 16.7% higher compared to 2017, which seems great. But the dividend per unit is actually flat over the 2 years, which is a more accurate reflection of how I am allocating capital (and Carillion, etc).
torata
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 5338 times
Re: Unitisation question
torata wrote:
Accumulation - I use the value of each whole portfolio - stocks+cash. Due to my situation in the sentence above, for ISA (and Sipp), there's never a change to the number of units, just the unit value.
Income - I use the value of stocks only - cash only 'gets counted' (ie buys or sells units) when it buys or sells stocks, not when it comes into the account in the form of dividends.
I realise that I'm probably not strictly following the standard unitization process for Income, but it's very simple, and works for me.
torata
I believe all that is correct. Either that - or we are both incorrect
And I thought that was the standard way of doing it....
Arb.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8401
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 4226 times
Re: Unitisation question
I don't think that there is a correct way. You just do what suits your system. Unless you accumulate a lot of cash, it is unlikely to be a significant percentage of the portfolio value.
TJH
TJH
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 511
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:57 pm
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 229 times
Re: Unitisation question
Arborbridge wrote:torata wrote:
Accumulation - I use the value of each whole portfolio - stocks+cash. Due to my situation in the sentence above, for ISA (and Sipp), there's never a change to the number of units, just the unit value.
Income - I use the value of stocks only - cash only 'gets counted' (ie buys or sells units) when it buys or sells stocks, not when it comes into the account in the form of dividends.
I realise that I'm probably not strictly following the standard unitization process for Income, but it's very simple, and works for me.
torata
I believe all that is correct. Either that - or we are both incorrect
And I thought that was the standard way of doing it....
Arb.
I haven't worked it through, but I suspect it doesn't matter when you add the dividends for income units - as cash doesn't affect the unit value. I realise that if you add them later the unit value will have changed, but the number of units you buy will change accordingly, so I think the unit value will end up the same.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 5338 times
Re: Unitisation question
Gersemi wrote:
I haven't worked it through, but I suspect it doesn't matter when you add the dividends for income units - as cash doesn't affect the unit value. I realise that if you add them later the unit value will have changed, but the number of units you buy will change accordingly, so I think the unit value will end up the same.
Income units are defined by the fact that income is being withdrawn. The cash has "leaked away" and might be used to buy ice-creams or shares for all I know. Dividends are not added for income units.
Arb.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 511
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:57 pm
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 229 times
Re: Unitisation question
Arborbridge wrote:Gersemi wrote:
I haven't worked it through, but I suspect it doesn't matter when you add the dividends for income units - as cash doesn't affect the unit value. I realise that if you add them later the unit value will have changed, but the number of units you buy will change accordingly, so I think the unit value will end up the same.
Income units are defined by the fact that income is being withdrawn. The cash has "leaked away" and might be used to buy ice-creams or shares for all I know. Dividends are not added for income units.
Arb.
I was referring to the dividends that are reinvested.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 5338 times
Re: Unitisation question
Gersemi wrote:Arborbridge wrote:Gersemi wrote:
I haven't worked it through, but I suspect it doesn't matter when you add the dividends for income units - as cash doesn't affect the unit value. I realise that if you add them later the unit value will have changed, but the number of units you buy will change accordingly, so I think the unit value will end up the same.
Income units are defined by the fact that income is being withdrawn. The cash has "leaked away" and might be used to buy ice-creams or shares for all I know. Dividends are not added for income units.
Arb.
I was referring to the dividends that are reinvested.
So was I. You don't include them until they are invested, only then do you ackowledge they exist, and unitise them as part of a new purchase, should that happen. Maybe we agree on that but expressed it differently?
Arb.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8401
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 4226 times
Re: Unitisation question
I think that the alternative method might be to roll up dividends in the income units until you are ready to reinvest them, then create new units with the reinvested dividends. Effectively your income units go XD.
I cannot see any good reason for not including retained cash in the portfolio value.
TJH
I cannot see any good reason for not including retained cash in the portfolio value.
TJH
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 655
- Joined: August 31st, 2018, 9:08 pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 251 times
Re: Unitisation question
I am only included new money invested in the portfolio as well as capital changes to the holdings.
All dividends and Return of Capital are ignored for Unitisation calcs but I do have a "Dividends/Unit" calculation which I annualise by simply dividing dividends for the period by units held and multiplying by 365.
This may be wrong, it may be crude but it does give me a simple, understandable comparison of the value movements.
All dividends and Return of Capital are ignored for Unitisation calcs but I do have a "Dividends/Unit" calculation which I annualise by simply dividing dividends for the period by units held and multiplying by 365.
This may be wrong, it may be crude but it does give me a simple, understandable comparison of the value movements.
Return to “HYP Practical (See Group Guidelines)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: SuperCally and 39 guests